What Goodreads is all about. discussion
Books in General
>
Twilight vs. Hary Potter DEBATE
message 1:
by
Anna
(new)
Nov 22, 2009 07:38AM

reply
|
flag
Ive read nether soo i dont know
Okay, so I sit down and look at this topic, right?
Then I wonder: which is better?
Then I think: HP, duh!
Then I think: but I did like Twilight...
so now I'm in the middle!!
Then I wonder: which is better?
Then I think: HP, duh!
Then I think: but I did like Twilight...
so now I'm in the middle!!
i like harry potter because, dont judge me, its just better written. stephanie myer is a good author but the kind of author that holds certain ppls attention. i liked twilight but i wasnt madly in love with it. jk rowlings on the other hand leaves you on your seat from page 1. she has that gift. she keeps the reader reading until the last page. i was always so mad when i finished her book because i usually didnt have the next one. between hp and twilight, im always going for harry potter.
i am a ahrry potter fan and nobody can change that. twilight was poorly written i think but its my opinion
plz read them b4 u say anything bad about hp until u have read it plz, i hate ppl who judge books when they havent even read them
sorcerers stone, chamber of secrets, prisoner of askaban, goblet of fire, order of the pheonix, half-blood prince, deathly hallows
I have read all of the Harry Potter books and all of the Twilight books. I enjoyed all of every book, to different degrees. That being said, I believe that overall, the Harry Potter series is better than the Twilight series, although, there are four twilight books and seven Harry Potter books, so it gives you longer to get to know the Harry Potter characters, longer to get attached to them.
The reason that I like Harry Potter better than Twilight is because I believe that the secondary characters and plot lines are better developed in Harry Potter than Twilight. They both have excellent Primary characters and plotlines, but it is the secondary stuff that really helps decide which is a better book.
The reason that I like Harry Potter better than Twilight is because I believe that the secondary characters and plot lines are better developed in Harry Potter than Twilight. They both have excellent Primary characters and plotlines, but it is the secondary stuff that really helps decide which is a better book.

THANK YOU!!!

I agree with Jeremy, that was a very good analysis.
I do agree that JKR handles the romance in her books very well, she puts the relationships in there without it having to be the main plot in the book.


I think harry potter is the best even though I like both

I don't like Twilight at all to be honest. If vampires were actually real, they are the walking dead. They live for blood. It doesn't matter how pretty she was, she's a walking blood bank that you can't resist. A vampire isn't going to fall in love with you, they are going to eat you.

"Your scent is like a drug to me."
I think pretty lame.

"I don't need a cloak to become invisible."
That is one BA old man. Did you see the HBP movie? He was like 'Woo I have a super sparkler and you don't!'
What do you guys say is better HP or Twilight becauuse i want to read the books but i dont know what to reads 1st.


There are definetly people out there somewhere that believe Twilight is better than Harry Potter, it just doesn't seem like they are in this group. Honestly, I think that people actually are taking the time to think about it and make an actual debate out of it and that's why Harry Potter is winning. Also, there are Twilight fans out there that haven't read Harry Potter or the other way around. Both book series have blind followers who won't even consider the idea that there are other books out there that could be better than their book, and it speaks highly of our group that none of us have fallen into that mindset here.
......ok ive read 3 of them and new moon was actually........ well, how do i put this nicely, bad. i think eclipse was bwetter