Harry Potter vs Twilight discussion
Twilight vs Harry Potter
>
Dumbledore VS Edward Cullen! ^^
message 1:
by
Laurena
(new)
May 17, 2010 05:53AM
Dumbledore would win. Hands down.
reply
|
flag
No, not gonna happen. Dumbledore would own! Harry Vs Edward... Edward. Dumbledore vs Edward... ALBUS!
*clears throat* "Movious fastier!" he moves faster, Dumbledore can make spells up on the spot. Im sure, he's talented.
I don't think Dumbledore would even need to move fast to win. He could just stand there do a spell, without even saying anything, and win. Plus...can't Dumbledore go invisible or something without the use of Harry's cloak? If not, I'm sure he's not above stealing it again.Edward can only hear the general direction of the thoughts. He would hear Dumbledore coming, but wouldn't be able to attack him.
ya, plus depending on what point in time this is, dumbledore would have the resersection stone, or be dead... so its either immortal or dead.
Yeah. But Edward is dead too. So it would be pretty fair. Dumbledore could totally fight from beyond the grave. He's just that amazing.
But Dumbledore can read minds too.So while Edward thought he was reading Dumbledore's mind, he could really be reading his own mind. That would throw him off his game and then Dumbledore would win.
Yeah Dumbledore can go invisible and he can apparate also, so as soon as Edward drew too near he could just apparate farter away.
Dumbledore isn't my favourite, but I can't say he wouldn't dominate over Edward. Edward is just dumb compared to him. He sparkles!I say that, and I defend Jasper and Emmett. I'm contradictory.
Sorta. It makes sense to me obviously, since I was doing that too. But to other people who don't realize how obsessed you are with Harry Potter, it can be confusing.
(Guess what Andy!! I made my "pong game" have a ball that is kirby spinnin in circles, the one i showed you yesterady!!!)
OK, Harry would so win against Edward.1. Harry has a broomstick (flying)
2. Harry has the sword of Gryffindor (could a vampire stand against goblin-tempered metal? I think not)
3. Harry has a wand
You can make any argument you like but Harry will WIN!
1, The broomstick would not help- he would be flying, so when he shot at edward, edward would have time to dodge, because harry is far enough away. So then harry flies closer to give edward less time to dodge, and edward, jumps and sucks harry's blood.2, yes, edward could, if harry cut a piece of edward off Edward could lick it and glue it back on (says so in the bree tanner thing) plus the goblin made metal isn't strong enough (plus the sword isn't harry's, it belongs to the school).
3, again, If far enough away, Edward could dodge, if closer edward could pounce.
I just countered all of your arguments.
1, this is Dumbledore vs Edward2, if edward was far enough away than he could dodge, so the broomstick wouldn't help.
3, the sword of gryffindore isn't strong enough
4, same as 2.
Same difference, there isn't a Harry vs Edward anyways, and people have been doing harry vs edward here anywaysHarry could dodge just as easily with Apparating
how would you know? it's goblin-tempered
Harry would win because in the HP world, vampires are much more easily defeated, just ask Lupin.
even Voldemort couldn't beat Albusand since Eddy can't beat him then i guess he would lose against Dumbldore as well.
Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore is amazing.
Dumbeldore would beat Edward. Harry would not. Simple as that. Just because you say that vampires in the HP world are easily defeated doesn't mean that Edward would be, because he's from the Twilight world. Secondly, goblin-tempered metal or not, the sword would only hinder Edward. Just metal will not kill him. That is how to kill a werewolf...and only quicksilver then. And, Harry isn't that great at apparating. And with Edward's uncanny ability to hear thoughts, Edward would know where Harry was going, what he was planning on doing, and be able to counter it within a second, because Meyer's vampires think on many different levels, and can carry on multiple trains of thought all at once, and at very high speeds. Therefore Harry loses to Edward.
Of course the sword wouldn't kill him- but it would hurt him. To fully kill a vampire in Edward's world, you need to burn it. Harry could use Fiendfyre, or cursed fire. Even Hermione's bluebell flames might do it. An Impediment Jinx could easily slow Edward in his tracks. If Harry is far enough away, Edward couldn't hear his thoughts. Then he could Apparate in without Edward knowing.Why are we assuming they are both in their own worlds? In Harry's world, a vampire is killed much more easily. In Edward's world, Harry couldn't exist. Therefore, they wouldn't be facing off in the first place.
Even if they were together, they'd be on the same side. They might even be friends.
If Harry is far enough away for Edward to not hear his thoughts, he'd have to be a mile away or more. And I agree that they would probably be friends. They probably would have teamed up to defeat their respective bad guys.



