The Awesomest Hunger Games Group discussion
I HATED THE SECOND BOOK
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Harry
(new)
Oct 17, 2010 07:47AM

reply
|
flag

Harry wrote: "I wish catching fire was more interesting. only the end was exciting"
Usually, the second books in sequels can be a bit of a downer. But it was still completely exciting and intense and thrilling.
Usually, the second books in sequels can be a bit of a downer. But it was still completely exciting and intense and thrilling.

Really? I thought the arena was good at first, but it got kind of bland once the cornicopia spun and wiress died

I agree that the HG was the best, but CF was awesome as well!
I loved how that even though they were all thrown into the arena again, SC spun an amazing new plot and the details and thrillingness of it all really made it awesome
Catching Fire was good. I just liked HG better.
i liked the romance. katniss and peeta forever!

the second was ok. sequels are usually arent as fantastic as the first. still i loved the series. oh by the way, im harrys cousin, also harry. sorry if hes a jerk sometimes. he doesnt get when to stop sometimes. if you dont believe im his cousin, i can tell you he lives on the corner of a street on a mountian and the area around him has several mountians, the main ones signal mtnand lookout mtn