A History of Royals discussion
Royalty In Film
>
The King's Speech (2010)
date
newest »

I haven't seen it, but either Colin Firth or Geoffrey Rush, or both are possible for Oscar Nominations for it, according to sources, lol. Actually, with Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush both in it, it should be good.

To be honest, I had never heard of the movie until two weeks ago.
I find this pre World World II era fascinating and look forward to seeing it. Apparently Helena Bonham Carter does a great job playing Queen Elizabeth (the present queen's mother)
FYI - per today's Today in History thread, today is the date of Edward's abdication and George's ascension to the throne.
This movie is really getting a lot of press currently, and I am really looking forward to seeing it.
This movie is really getting a lot of press currently, and I am really looking forward to seeing it.

Really really well done and great acting by everyone.
Gives an intimate peek into the background of King George VI.
I was thinking how strange that we all grew up while Queen Elizabeth (the Queen Mother)still lived, but so little is known about the short reign of her husband.
The movie does an excellent job portraying the struggle endured by the Duke of York/George VI to speak in public.
My only pet peeve is how they made it look as if George VI never made a speech from the moment he became King (1937) until the outbreak of WWII (1939).




The movie does not reference the book at all, so I was thinking that they are concurrent, but not related? I'm pretty sure that the Logue book is the one that Liz was referencing.



I've just finished reading Sarah Bradford's biography of George VI, and she says that Logue was in the crowd when Prince Albert (as was) had an agonizing time giving a speech at the closing of the British Empire Exhibition at Wembley Stadium, in 1925. Logue reportedly said of the Prince then, "He's too old for me to manage a complete cure. But I could very nearly do it." The Prince began his therapy in 1926, and Logue's treatment "produced an almost instant improvement, which was particularly noticeable only two months after he first consulted the therapist." Bradford says that by the time of the abdication the Prince had mostly conquered his stutter, as far as public speaking was concerned.
When George VI became king and had to do live radio broadcasts, a microphone expert named Robert Wood, along with Logue, helped him to "minimize the effects of his stammer" when using a microphone. So perhaps these sessions are the basis of the movie?



I can't get over how blown away I was by all of the acting performances.
I had an interesting conversation with my friends after the movie though. I remember growing up in the US that whenever I heard about Edward's abdication in school or elsewhere it was presented as something quite romantic. The man giving up the throne for his love.
My friend Liz's father is British and she grew up hearing the stories of how selfish he was to abandon the country when he did. I have to say that after seeing the movie and doing some reading, I definitely have a much less romantic view of the man.

I can't get over how blown away I was by all of the acting performances.
I had an interesting conversation with my..."
Well said. I completely agree with you, the acting was phenomenal. It really piqued my interest about the British monarchy and especially King George VI.
Colleen wrote: "I just saw a preview of this movie on the TV and I can't wait to see it!"
I'm with you, Colleen. I can't wait to see it. British Monarchy, Geoffrey Rusch, and Colin Firth. How can you go wrong?
I'm with you, Colleen. I can't wait to see it. British Monarchy, Geoffrey Rusch, and Colin Firth. How can you go wrong?

I'm with you, Colleen. I can't wait to see it. British Monarchy, Geoffrey Rusch, and Colin Firth. How c..."
Especially, Colin Firth. Oh he is handsome!


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1504320/