Hard SF discussion
Member Chat
>
Bad Science Fiction
date
newest »

The "sound in space" in Contact is actually the sound in Earth's radio emissions, so I don't think it qualifies as bad....
Lol, well, so much for making point five past lightspeed.
Though I tend not to think of it as "bad," but rather "not possible yet."
Though I tend not to think of it as "bad," but rather "not possible yet."

BTW, what was so strange about 2001's depiction of the effects of exposure to vacuum? I thought they did pretty good. Here's some support I found.
Oh, and the chart definitely got the ninth column's title wrong: "faster-than light weapons"?

Original source. Yeah, it’s about movies, but still..."
Sorry but those 2 ticks for 2001 should go! Ok so in vacuum you should exhale not take a breath but it is possible to survive minimal exposure to vacuum. And moving slow in zero G, well yea you wouldnt be able to run about as you can on earth because in space, as in water, theres nothing to push against.



Me thinks somebody had an agenda when they came up with that one. Heck the last two are more historical movies than SF!

did anyone ever watch Defying Gravity? i tried, but it was too painful. i seem to remember in that they gave the pat explanation of the astronauts clothes being made from a magnetic fabric that pulled them toward the floor and simulated gravity. aside from the fact that it would also pull them toward the walls and consoles of the spacecraft, it also seems to affect Laura Harris' ponytail
Original source. Yeah, it’s about movies, but still...