English Mysteries Club discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Archive Pre-August 2012 Revival
>
February 2011: Dorothy Sayers - Whose Body
message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Jan 16, 2011 02:25PM
Please use this discussion topic to discuss the first Book of the Month for the English Mysteries Club! Happy Reading!
reply
|
flag
Please confirm if you're going to participate in this first Book of the Month for the club. I'm picking up the book from my library this week and aim to finish no later than end of February. Who else is in??? :-)
Cheers!
Cheers!

Hi David - That's great! The more...the merrier!
Cheers!
~S~
Cheers!
~S~
Hi Jennifer - Glad to have you in the BotM plan! Should be good! :-)
Cheers!
~S~
Cheers!
~S~
Excellent! Looks like we're off an running then! Thanks everyone!

That's great! The more...the merrier!!! :-)
Hope everyone has a copy of Dorothy Sayers 'Whose Body?' by now and is beginning to read for the current Book of the Month. I've got my copy and will start posting discussion questions at the end of February. If you aren't already participating, please join us! :-)
Excellent! I'm really glad folks are getting on board with this and I'm looking forward to the discussions as well!
That's great! Shame there's not a 'like' button on here similar to Facebook! :-)

Wonderful! We're happy to have you along! :-)

That said, the book so far was totally worth the read for one reason - I learned a new word (on pg 120)
Blatherskite
1. a talkative silly person
2. foolish talk; nonsense
I will be using that whenever possible in the future.

Therese - No worries about the timing! It's not too long a book really and the goal is to finish by the end of February...plenty of time and we're glad to have you along!
Elizabeth - you've just hit on one of my favourite aspects of English mysteries (David did too acutally...): use of language and fantastic words and wording. Blatherskite is definitely a good one even if the book wasn't quite to David's taste.
We'll talk more about the book at the end of the month...I'm getting questions together already! Happy reading, all!
Elizabeth - you've just hit on one of my favourite aspects of English mysteries (David did too acutally...): use of language and fantastic words and wording. Blatherskite is definitely a good one even if the book wasn't quite to David's taste.
We'll talk more about the book at the end of the month...I'm getting questions together already! Happy reading, all!

I've often wondered that as well. Perhaps some insight here:
http://www.thingsmeanalot.com/2010/07...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Pet...
Perhaps she just means it as one of his quirks? :-)
http://www.thingsmeanalot.com/2010/07...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Pet...
Perhaps she just means it as one of his quirks? :-)

Quite possibly! Although my first thought is that this may also have been a tendency in earlier generations - such as Dorothy Sayer's generation.
I lived in England for the past nine years and you can always tell the super-posh and upper class by both their accent and the way they speak and the ones I knew would never speak that way or use a phrase like that. But then, the English class system which was once VERY rigid (i.e. when Sayers was writing) is becoming far more fluid so perhaps not speaking in such a way now is a method by the upper class to seem more like the middle classes? Can't really imagine Prince William using this phrase! :-) And I liked the analogy in the wikipedia entry comparing the relationship between Wimsey and Bunter with Jeeves and Wooster. So perhaps we see it as a curious way to speak because it's a reflection of the age of the book? It's all great food for thought as we're reading!
I lived in England for the past nine years and you can always tell the super-posh and upper class by both their accent and the way they speak and the ones I knew would never speak that way or use a phrase like that. But then, the English class system which was once VERY rigid (i.e. when Sayers was writing) is becoming far more fluid so perhaps not speaking in such a way now is a method by the upper class to seem more like the middle classes? Can't really imagine Prince William using this phrase! :-) And I liked the analogy in the wikipedia entry comparing the relationship between Wimsey and Bunter with Jeeves and Wooster. So perhaps we see it as a curious way to speak because it's a reflection of the age of the book? It's all great food for thought as we're reading!

Exactly! Me too! I read all of the Sayers' Lord Wimsey Mysteries about a million years ago...or maybe about 15 years now really. And since then and seeing Jeeves and Wooster by Fry & Laurie have kind of imagined Wimsey & Bunter to be sort of the same in my head. :-)


P.G. Wodehouse: http://www.pgwodehousebooks.com/
The series aren't mystery's but are so much fun, if you like British humor you'll love them.

I've added all the Lord Peter mysteries to my TBR list now, along with Jeeves & Wooster. FYI, the entry for Sayers on Wikipedia states that she once said that Lord Peter was a mixture of Fred Astaire and Bertie Wooster, so looks like our mental images are right on :)



Here you go: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqvddp...


My goodness - I'm away a few days and look at all the activity...LOVE IT!
Sherry - so glad you piped up to ask about the references to Fry & Laurie. It's curious - House is now on in re-runs in England but for most of the time I was there they were known for their comedies in the 80s and 90s, esp. Jeeves and Wooster", as quite the double act. So glad others in the group were able to help explain what we were talking about.
It's kind of like terminology - the differences between English and American as languages are VAST! I'm still trying to find a way to use blatherskite in everyday conversation thanx to David's post!
Not long now...end of February is our deadline...can't wait for more chat about the book!
Sherry - so glad you piped up to ask about the references to Fry & Laurie. It's curious - House is now on in re-runs in England but for most of the time I was there they were known for their comedies in the 80s and 90s, esp. Jeeves and Wooster", as quite the double act. So glad others in the group were able to help explain what we were talking about.
It's kind of like terminology - the differences between English and American as languages are VAST! I'm still trying to find a way to use blatherskite in everyday conversation thanx to David's post!
Not long now...end of February is our deadline...can't wait for more chat about the book!

Sherry - Great to know that others (i.e. Bill O'Reilly!) are interested in some of the quirkier words in use today. Love that blatherskite came up!
ALL - Today is the last day of the month for our first BotM reading circle within the group. Please feel free to start flooding this thread with your thoughts, feedback, questions, and analysis!
Confession from your moderator...this is the 2nd time I've read it! :-) I read all of Sayer's books several years ago and have loved coming back to them so many years later.
I think my favorite thing about her books are the subtle plot links that only make sense towards the end. For her time, she was a very modern writer in many ways.
What do you think? Can't wait to start seeing comments and feedback as we move onto our next title!! Let's have some grand discussions about our first BotM! All comments and feeback welcome!
Confession from your moderator...this is the 2nd time I've read it! :-) I read all of Sayer's books several years ago and have loved coming back to them so many years later.
I think my favorite thing about her books are the subtle plot links that only make sense towards the end. For her time, she was a very modern writer in many ways.
What do you think? Can't wait to start seeing comments and feedback as we move onto our next title!! Let's have some grand discussions about our first BotM! All comments and feeback welcome!
A few resources while you're considering your responses:
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/...
http://www.sayers.org.uk/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_...
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/...
http://www.sayers.org.uk/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_...

I did again notice his prejudice toward Levy's religion . Also in 1923 Whimsey certainly did not use English that would be used today. Do I want to read more????

I think you're right, Sherry! I think the book has to be viewed in the context in which it was written. I would imagine it would've caused quite a stir back in the day as a Lord was hardly likely to be mixing with 'unsavoury' or 'common' people and yet Lord Peter delights in it. A little rebellious streak on Sayer's part, perhaps? I like to think so.
And really - it doesn't take decades for some terms and viewpoints to change significantly. I remember a show from when I lived in England called 'Only Fools and Horses'. Now - I've only see the reruns as it was a show from the 1980s and I wasn't living there until 2001. However, it uses the term 'paki' to refer to people of middle-eastern and specifically Pakistani origin. At the time, people didn't think anything of it but now there is NO WAY you could use a term like that on a prime-time show.
I think in the case of Sayer's writing and 'Whose Body', we have to kind of assume so much of those attitudes were at least understood if not completely embraced.
And I agree - it does start a bit slowly. But once it starts twisting and turning it gets really good, I think! Lord Wimsey is a little like an art-deco period Sherlock Holmes in his ability to take the tiniest speck and deduce a clue from it. Love that kind of thing!
And really - it doesn't take decades for some terms and viewpoints to change significantly. I remember a show from when I lived in England called 'Only Fools and Horses'. Now - I've only see the reruns as it was a show from the 1980s and I wasn't living there until 2001. However, it uses the term 'paki' to refer to people of middle-eastern and specifically Pakistani origin. At the time, people didn't think anything of it but now there is NO WAY you could use a term like that on a prime-time show.
I think in the case of Sayer's writing and 'Whose Body', we have to kind of assume so much of those attitudes were at least understood if not completely embraced.
And I agree - it does start a bit slowly. But once it starts twisting and turning it gets really good, I think! Lord Wimsey is a little like an art-deco period Sherlock Holmes in his ability to take the tiniest speck and deduce a clue from it. Love that kind of thing!
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.