English Mysteries Club discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
47 views
Archive Pre-August 2012 Revival > February 2011: Dorothy Sayers - Whose Body

Comments Showing 1-50 of 64 (64 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1

message 1: by [deleted user] (new)

Please use this discussion topic to discuss the first Book of the Month for the English Mysteries Club! Happy Reading!


message 2: by [deleted user] (new)

Please confirm if you're going to participate in this first Book of the Month for the club. I'm picking up the book from my library this week and aim to finish no later than end of February. Who else is in??? :-)
Cheers!


message 3: by David (new)

David Peters I don't normally go for the older stuff, but my library has a copy so I will pick itup today after work.


message 4: by Jennifer (new)

Jennifer (jhaltenburger) I'm game.


message 5: by [deleted user] (new)

Hi David - That's great! The more...the merrier!
Cheers!
~S~


message 6: by [deleted user] (new)

Hi Jennifer - Glad to have you in the BotM plan! Should be good! :-)
Cheers!
~S~


message 7: by KelleReads (new)

KelleReads (kellewpl) | 14 comments I'm in!


message 8: by [deleted user] (new)

Excellent! Looks like we're off an running then! Thanks everyone!


message 9: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (elizabeth8921) | 41 comments got the book today and will begin reading.


message 10: by David (new)

David Peters Starting today


message 11: by [deleted user] (new)

I got my copy today!! YAY!


message 12: by Martha (new)

Martha | 4 comments me too!


message 13: by Angel (new)

Angel (amh-reads) I want to try and participate in this. I've not read any Dorothy Sayers books, but am always looking for new books to read. I noticed there are a few versions of this book available for Kindle for only .99. I'll probably get a copy that way. Looks like the one copy my library has is checked out at the moment.


message 14: by [deleted user] (new)

That's great! The more...the merrier!!! :-)


message 15: by [deleted user] (new)

Hope everyone has a copy of Dorothy Sayers 'Whose Body?' by now and is beginning to read for the current Book of the Month. I've got my copy and will start posting discussion questions at the end of February. If you aren't already participating, please join us! :-)


message 16: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (elizabeth8921) | 41 comments got the book and am reading it. Look forward to discussion.


message 17: by [deleted user] (new)

Excellent! I'm really glad folks are getting on board with this and I'm looking forward to the discussions as well!


message 18: by David (new)

David Peters 100 pages into it.


message 19: by [deleted user] (new)

That's great! Shame there's not a 'like' button on here similar to Facebook! :-)


message 20: by Tammy (new)

Tammy | 5 comments Count me in. I've never read Sayers before but I've seen some of the TV adaptations done by the BBC and loved them. For anyone using a Kindle, you can download a copy for as little as $0.99.


message 21: by [deleted user] (new)

Wonderful! We're happy to have you along! :-)


message 22: by David (new)

David Peters Okay, I am 150 pages into it and unfortunately it is not my thing. I should finish later today.

That said, the book so far was totally worth the read for one reason - I learned a new word (on pg 120)

Blatherskite
1. a talkative silly person
2. foolish talk; nonsense

I will be using that whenever possible in the future.


message 23: by [deleted user] (new)

I'm in.


message 24: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (elizabeth8921) | 41 comments Have to really pay attention to every word to get the full meaning of this story


message 25: by Therese (new)

Therese | 13 comments She's been on my 'to-read' list for awhile... so I'm in. May seem like I'm getting in late, but I'll be finished by month's end. What a great pick!


message 26: by [deleted user] (new)

Therese - No worries about the timing! It's not too long a book really and the goal is to finish by the end of February...plenty of time and we're glad to have you along!

Elizabeth - you've just hit on one of my favourite aspects of English mysteries (David did too acutally...): use of language and fantastic words and wording. Blatherskite is definitely a good one even if the book wasn't quite to David's taste.

We'll talk more about the book at the end of the month...I'm getting questions together already! Happy reading, all!


message 27: by Sherry (new)

Sherry I will finish Whose Body today. It started a bit slowly for me, but is a good enough mystery that I will read at least the next couple of books in this series, because I generally enjoy mysteries featuring members of the aristocracy who act as sleuths. I hope the books will get better - and become more amusing - as the series progresses.


message 28: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (elizabeth8921) | 41 comments Why does Whimsey say "ain't so much?


message 29: by [deleted user] (new)

I've often wondered that as well. Perhaps some insight here:

http://www.thingsmeanalot.com/2010/07...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Pet...

Perhaps she just means it as one of his quirks? :-)


message 30: by Tammy (new)

Tammy | 5 comments I've always understood it to be a quirk of the English upper class, indicating that their station is life is so elevated that they aren't required to speak "properly." Under this view, anyone who is too proper is obviously of a lower station because they're trying too hard (which they wouldn't need to do if they were already one of them).


message 31: by [deleted user] (new)

Quite possibly! Although my first thought is that this may also have been a tendency in earlier generations - such as Dorothy Sayer's generation.

I lived in England for the past nine years and you can always tell the super-posh and upper class by both their accent and the way they speak and the ones I knew would never speak that way or use a phrase like that. But then, the English class system which was once VERY rigid (i.e. when Sayers was writing) is becoming far more fluid so perhaps not speaking in such a way now is a method by the upper class to seem more like the middle classes? Can't really imagine Prince William using this phrase! :-) And I liked the analogy in the wikipedia entry comparing the relationship between Wimsey and Bunter with Jeeves and Wooster. So perhaps we see it as a curious way to speak because it's a reflection of the age of the book? It's all great food for thought as we're reading!


message 32: by Therese (new)

Therese | 13 comments Ah, Jeeves & Wooster, love Jeeves & Wooster... especially done by Steven Fry and Hugh Laurie - great fun.


message 33: by [deleted user] (new)

Exactly! Me too! I read all of the Sayers' Lord Wimsey Mysteries about a million years ago...or maybe about 15 years now really. And since then and seeing Jeeves and Wooster by Fry & Laurie have kind of imagined Wimsey & Bunter to be sort of the same in my head. :-)


message 34: by Sherry (new)

Sherry OK, I've heard of Jeeves and Wooster, but never read any books with them as characters. Who is the author? Sounds as though my tbr pile is about to grow again!


message 35: by Therese (new)

Therese | 13 comments Sherry wrote: "OK, I've heard of Jeeves and Wooster, but never read any books with them as characters. Who is the author? Sounds as though my tbr pile is about to grow again!"

P.G. Wodehouse: http://www.pgwodehousebooks.com/
The series aren't mystery's but are so much fun, if you like British humor you'll love them.


message 36: by Tammy (new)

Tammy | 5 comments Fry & Laurie are hilarious! Although it's weird to watch Laurie as House, hard to believe it's the same person (I was amazed to discover he's a Brit, he's so believable).

I've added all the Lord Peter mysteries to my TBR list now, along with Jeeves & Wooster. FYI, the entry for Sayers on Wikipedia states that she once said that Lord Peter was a mixture of Fred Astaire and Bertie Wooster, so looks like our mental images are right on :)


message 37: by Sherry (new)

Sherry ...And who, please, are Fry & Laurie? I feel as though I've wandered into a foreign land where everyone else knows the language except me!


message 38: by Tammy (new)

Tammy | 5 comments Stephen Fry & Hugh Laurie (a/k/a Dr. House on Fox Network). They met at Cambridge and have done a number of projects together (mostly in the 80's and 90's), including a TV adaptation of the Jeeves & Wooster books and their own comedy sketch show, A Bit of Fry & Laurie. If you like British humor, you should definitely check them out.


message 39: by Therese (new)

Therese | 13 comments Sherry wrote: "...And who, please, are Fry & Laurie? I feel as though I've wandered into a foreign land where everyone else knows the language except me!"

Here you go: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqvddp...


message 40: by Sherry (new)

Sherry Thanks! I would never have believed House was ever a comedian if I hadn't seen it. Well, cheerio! Must go watch episode 2!


message 41: by Martha (new)

Martha | 4 comments Sorry to go even further off topic - but Totleigh Towers, a reoccurring location in "Jeeves & Wooster", was filmed at Highclere Castle, which is also used for "Downton Abbey".


message 42: by [deleted user] (new)

My goodness - I'm away a few days and look at all the activity...LOVE IT!

Sherry - so glad you piped up to ask about the references to Fry & Laurie. It's curious - House is now on in re-runs in England but for most of the time I was there they were known for their comedies in the 80s and 90s, esp. Jeeves and Wooster", as quite the double act. So glad others in the group were able to help explain what we were talking about.

It's kind of like terminology - the differences between English and American as languages are VAST! I'm still trying to find a way to use blatherskite in everyday conversation thanx to David's post!

Not long now...end of February is our deadline...can't wait for more chat about the book!


message 43: by Sherry (new)

Sherry I often watch Bill O'Reilly's show on the Fox News Channel, and at the end of every show he has a "word of the day." Blatherskite was one of those, and he's used "pettifogger," "poltroon," "hornswoggle," "popinjay," and a whole host of others. Very fun!


message 44: by [deleted user] (new)

Sherry - Great to know that others (i.e. Bill O'Reilly!) are interested in some of the quirkier words in use today. Love that blatherskite came up!


message 45: by [deleted user] (new)

ALL - Today is the last day of the month for our first BotM reading circle within the group. Please feel free to start flooding this thread with your thoughts, feedback, questions, and analysis!

Confession from your moderator...this is the 2nd time I've read it! :-) I read all of Sayer's books several years ago and have loved coming back to them so many years later.

I think my favorite thing about her books are the subtle plot links that only make sense towards the end. For her time, she was a very modern writer in many ways.

What do you think? Can't wait to start seeing comments and feedback as we move onto our next title!! Let's have some grand discussions about our first BotM! All comments and feeback welcome!


message 46: by [deleted user] (new)


message 47: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (elizabeth8921) | 41 comments I especially loved the sarcasm of Lord Whimsey and his ability to use deductive reasoning in seconds.
I did again notice his prejudice toward Levy's religion . Also in 1923 Whimsey certainly did not use English that would be used today. Do I want to read more????


message 48: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (elizabeth8921) | 41 comments Agreed with Anna's comment. Agatha Christie' prejudice was very evident in her her books too.


message 49: by Sherry (new)

Sherry I liked the book, but thought it started a bit slowly. Lord Peter's sense of humor, and that of his manservant, was amusing; and the story had enough twists and turns to keep me interested. I suspect the attitudes reflected are simply those common at the time the book was written.


message 50: by [deleted user] (new)

I think you're right, Sherry! I think the book has to be viewed in the context in which it was written. I would imagine it would've caused quite a stir back in the day as a Lord was hardly likely to be mixing with 'unsavoury' or 'common' people and yet Lord Peter delights in it. A little rebellious streak on Sayer's part, perhaps? I like to think so.

And really - it doesn't take decades for some terms and viewpoints to change significantly. I remember a show from when I lived in England called 'Only Fools and Horses'. Now - I've only see the reruns as it was a show from the 1980s and I wasn't living there until 2001. However, it uses the term 'paki' to refer to people of middle-eastern and specifically Pakistani origin. At the time, people didn't think anything of it but now there is NO WAY you could use a term like that on a prime-time show.

I think in the case of Sayer's writing and 'Whose Body', we have to kind of assume so much of those attitudes were at least understood if not completely embraced.

And I agree - it does start a bit slowly. But once it starts twisting and turning it gets really good, I think! Lord Wimsey is a little like an art-deco period Sherlock Holmes in his ability to take the tiniest speck and deduce a clue from it. Love that kind of thing!


« previous 1
back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.