Simply Salinger discussion
Should The Catcher in the Rye be made into a movie?
date
newest »


No. It isn't the story of Holden that Salinger wanted to preserve in my opinion, but the story within the story of WW2. WW2 was a popular war and he couldn't write what he witnessed without suffering condemnation. Surely he witnessed things that were very painful, and he had a soul. This is why we feel that Holden has a soul. But it really is the book that has the soul and we need to look deeper into it. How many times have people seen a movie and thought they knew the book. Two examples here: Bambi A Life In the Woods by Felix Salten and The 39 Steps, because Salinger mentions that one in The Catcher in the Rye. You must read the book come to the point that you say I don't understand what he is trying to say and dig deeper. You can't do that in a predigested movie.


If so, who should be cast as Holden Caulfield? Who should be entrusted with directing it?
Love to hear your thoughts.