Ancient & Medieval Historical Fiction discussion
High Middle Ages (1000–1300)
>
1066
Terri wrote: "I enjoyed this book. It had its faults, but overall I thought it was well done.
The Last English King
And I have had this on my tbr for a whi..."
I wasn't such a fan of The Last English King. I read it on holiday and it was OK as a holiday read, but it lacked something to truly engage me.
Terri wrote: "Too much [spoilers removed]"lol. I'm afraid I have no memory of that at all. I do remember learning the origin of the word "Bulgars/Bulgaria". I think that was in this book. But can't remember that at all. Kind of my point I guess, it just failed to make much of an impact on me.
I've actually been thinking about it and I do recall there was far too much (view spoiler) for my liking. It was quite offputting. Sometimes I felt as if Rathbone was intentionally trying to push boundaries and shock conservatives.
I don't regard myself as conservative, not by a long shot, but at times even I was discomfited.
Terri wrote: "I've actually been thinking about it and I do recall there was far too much [spoilers removed] for my liking. It was quite offputting. Sometimes I felt as if Rathbone was intentionally trying to p..."
Well. Odd how I don't recall it. Oh well, can't say I'm that bothered by my failure to recall it!
I read The Needle in the Blood recently. It was kind of a mixed bag. There were moments I loved... but equally moments I felt so frustrated!
Lol, Terri! It's not that bad. It's pretty enjoyable... again, apart from certain moments of sheer frustration!
Probably not. But her other book, about the Borgias, is the same! In some ways really rather good, in other ways annoying.
This one hasn't been mentioned in this thread yet I don't think. It may be mentioned in the Norman or the Saxon thread, but not this one.
Conquest
I know this series was mentioned in either the Norman or Saxon thread. Not here though..
If anyone is wondering who this series is based on, here is a non fiction on Hereward,
Hereward: The Last Englishman
Terri wrote: "This one hasn't been mentioned in this thread yet I don't think. It may be mentioned in the Norman or the Saxon thread, but not this one.
Conquest"
I found it very average and only gave it 3 stars, which was possibly a little generous. To me the writing wasn't great and I found the way the author simply seems to provide a rehash of stories about Hereward without seeming to try to create a believable character annoying.
That seems a shame. I fancy the cover and had high hopes for it. Although I don't think my high hopes were justified as it rates poorly on GR.
Terri wrote: "That seems a shame. I fancy the cover and had high hopes for it. Although I don't think my high hopes were justified as it rates poorly on GR."Yeah I liked the cover, but found it promised more than the book delivered.
I really like the cover of James Wilde's Hereward too, but I'm not so sure now that Chris from the Netherlands (sorry Chris don't know your last name)gave it only one star. Although that seems to be for inaccurate geography, rather than bad writing.
Chris F wrote: "Terri wrote: "That seems a shame. I fancy the cover and had high hopes for it. Although I don't think my high hopes were justified as it rates poorly on GR."Yeah I liked the cover, but found it p..."
I seem to remember looking at the Hereward books on Amazon UK last year and noticing that they got some bad reviews on there. Anything that gets bad reviews on Amazon I'm wary of - that seems to be pretty difficult...
I just noticed that the Hereward series (the one by James Wilde) has a different cover and name now.From this;
to this;
The Time of the Wolf: A Novel of Medieval England
Terri wrote: "I just noticed that the Hereward series (the one by James Wilde) has a different cover and name now.From this;

to this;
[bookcover:The Time of the Wolf: A Novel of ..."
Seems we can't avoid talking about name changes just now! I guess maybe not many people in the US have heard of Hereward? Maybe Disney could make a film like they did for Robin Hood and King Arthur...
You have to admit that considering the history between America and England....why would they care about English history. History starts with the War for Independence. :) That said I know very few people who know any history unless they like it enough to learn on their own, not even our own. We learn about Native American history, with a chapter on the Vikings, in school.
Wellll, I don't know. A huge percentage of Americans have British ancestry and they seem proud of that.Genealogy services and websites catering to Americans and American tourists in Britain is big business.
Do you learn much about Scottish or French history in school Dawn?
Nope, I doubt even Quebec learns any French history. Our history is almost exclusively about North America, nothing from across the pond. So if the war was fought here I would know about it but not about the English or French politics that made it happen. Maybe some Scottish history in Atlantic Canada but not on the West Coast. I agree that they have the ancestry but the fact that they didn't leave peacefully and that the Americans thought the English tyrants, still affects their history. Wanting to learn your genealogy doesn't translate into learning other countries history, just your personal history.
To me they are far more proud of being independent Americans anything else. British heritage or not.
Interesting discussion. I completely understand Dawn's point about not learning about other nations: there's almost constant debate in Britain about learning (mainly) English (as opposed to British) history versus learning world history. I also accept that any starting point for learning history is pretty arbitrary unless you strictly adhere to the beginning of writing as the beginning of history (and let's face it, just doing a couple of hundred years has got to be easier, right?).That said, I also get Terri's point: if you're dealing with the history of N. America (as opposed to prehistory) then that begins in Europe.
As an aside, I was shocked by one of our students in Mongolia this year who had taken a university module in 'World History'. Having done this, she knew nothing about any of the various European wars that I could think of or (even more alarmingly for me) had ever heard of apartheid. There's certainly something wrong with history teaching in at least one institution in N. America.
I wonder if it is a Commonwealth Schools thing to learn World History as opposed to largely National History.We had to do (it was compulsory) two history subjects in school, Ancient History and Modern History.
Two different subjects to have to learn and do exams on..and for me, just two more classes to fail at...:0)
Maybe. We've spoken about my history classes at school somewhere in this group before: all of it was English and after the age of 13 all of it was dull.
Terri wrote: "I wonder if it is a Commonwealth Schools thing to learn World History as opposed to largely National History.We had to do (it was compulsory) two history subjects in school, Ancient History and Mo..."
Different again in NZ. Not taught at primary (elementary) except as part of Social Studies. At high school it was an elective! And then taught in modules, which were fairly random. I remember studying The Russian revolution, the Napoleonic Wars on the world front...and NZ's involvement in World Wars I & II. No ancient history. Actually, nothing before about 1800.
That's amazing. Why then did I have to suffer through two subjects of history at highschool! Lol. I suppose maybe I learned something.....there's that....
It is interesting that the periods of history I studied at school are the periods I have zero interest in now.
Yeah the lack of a symtematic history programme in New Zealand schools drives most of us who teach history up the wall. However, on a more positive note the freedom to teach whatever is relevant to our students in senior high school has led to more New Zealand history being taught than ever before and the ability to pick aspects of history that we think our students will like. Yesterday my head of departmant and I wrote a whole new course for year 13 (our last year of high school) to study next year. It has the following: the arrival of the ancestors of the Maori (imcluding where they came from, how they got here and the development of their history and culture up to the arrive of the first Europeans; early interactions and conflicts between Maori and Europeans up to the 1830s; a study of New Zealand involvement and the general campaigns at Galipoli and on the Western Front during WWI (with a case study of the historical debate about the quality of leadership during those campaigns); a comparative study of the battle for womens suffrage, prohibition and the depression in both NZ and the US. We also have a research project where students get to choose any significant historical event that they want to study. Hopefully they will enjoy this.In NZ the ancient history comes under classical studies, which is treated as a seperate optional subject at senior high school level and includes literature, art and architechture as well as history.
They're still teaching Classical studies? Excellent. I was one of the experimental class of 1981. They didn't appear sure if it would take off or not. Though we learned more about Homer and Virgil's writings than actual history.
Chris F wrote: "Yeah the lack of a symtematic history programme in New Zealand schools drives most of us who teach history up the wall. However, on a more positive note the freedom to teach whatever is relevant to..."That sounds great. I think World History is very important, but if any history is emphasized with the kids it should definitely be your own countries history. It helps to nurture pride in National heritage and culture.
So no 1066 then?
Margaret wrote: "They're still teaching Classical studies? Excellent. I was one of the experimental class of 1981. They didn't appear sure if it would take off or not. Though we learned more about Homer and Vir..."I don't know if Classical Studies was ever studied in Queensland schools. I had not heard of it until some of you mention it here.
I do not have any idea what is being taught in schools these days. I must ask my nephews.
I know that at my nephew's school the later grades in primary school have a class trip overseas to battlefields each year. eg Grade 6 & 7 of each year get to go or something, so there appears to be emphasis on modern history.
They go to battlefields in France and other countries. Where Australians fought in the two World Wars.
My nephews will be going with their class to Gallipoli (Turkey for those who don't know where that is) and my brother keeps whining about how much money it is going to cost him.
He's a moneybags, he can afford it. :)
Chris F wrote: "Yeah the lack of a symtematic history programme in New Zealand schools drives most of us who teach history up the wall. However, on a more positive note the freedom to teach whatever is relevant to..."That sounds like a great class, I'm sure (at least some) of your students will enjoy it!
Terri wrote: "Margaret wrote: "They're still teaching Classical studies? Excellent. I was one of the experimental class of 1981. They didn't appear sure if it would take off or not. Though we learned more ab..."
I had one year of classics, aged eight. It's more usually something studied at university here.
Terri wrote: "Margaret wrote: "They're still teaching Classical studies? Excellent. I was one of the experimental class of 1981. They didn't appear sure if it would take off or not. Though we learned more ab..."The ones who can afford something are usually the ones who whine about the costs. :p
Lee wrote: "Chris F wrote: "Yeah the lack of a symtematic history programme in New Zealand schools drives most of us who teach history up the wall. However, on a more positive note the freedom to teach whateve..."The idea of Classical Studies in New Zealand high schools (back in the early 80s) was to speed up progress through university. The NZ university system was then very much a twin of the UK one, with heavy emphasis on the classics and English literature. I was heading down that stream until my dad died...and university was no longer an option for me.
Margaret wrote: "The ones who can afford something are usually the ones who whine about the costs. :p..."Boy, ain't that the truth. :]
Margaret wrote: "Lee wrote: "Chris F wrote: "Yeah the lack of a symtematic history programme in New Zealand schools drives most of us who teach history up the wall. However, on a more positive note the freedom to t..."I actually meant as a degree option. I didn't study any classics or English Lit at university. My best friend and my ex-wife both studied English Lit., but they're the only people I know. No-one I know studied classics. The UK education system is very narrow, encouraging specialisation at a young age.
From what I remember, I did take a world history class in middle school. But it mainly focused on WWI and WWII. All that I know about world history I learned after I was out of school. Even in college the only requied history course was american history. But I am returning to college this year and am getting a history degree with a minor in humanitis. All of the history classes that I will be taking are world history. No more boring american history for me!!
Also to start off my education with a bang, I am taking a month and visiting Europe this fall. I am so excited!!
Congratulations, Brandy! What a great change of life direction. Back to college to learn world history and a month visiting Europe. I envy you and would like to do the same.Hopefully you'll get to see some of the sites that you will learn more intimate details on during your degree.
Hi Brandy hope it really goes well for you. As a history graduate and high school history teacher I am a little biased, but your plans sound like a fantastic choice.
Thanks Terri and Chris! I have always wanted to travel and this is just the beginning (hopefully). When I get back I will be sure to share some tales from my travels.Chris, what history subject do you teach?
~Brandy~ wrote: "When I get back I will be sure to share some tales from my travels...."
I hope so! We like to live vicariously through our members holidays. :)
~Brandy~ wrote: "Thanks Terri and Chris! I have always wanted to travel and this is just the beginning (hopefully). When I get back I will be sure to share some tales from my travels.Chris, what history subject d..."
Hi Brandy. Sorry but for some reason I didn't see that you had asked me a question until now. I've taught lots of different history topics over the years, everything from early New Zealand to the Vietnam War. This year my colleague and I are teaching a new programme to students in their final year of high school which covers; the origins of the Maori, early Maori European contacts, the historical dispute over the quality of Allied generals on the Western Front during WWI, and then comparative studies of women's suffrage, prohibition and the Great Depression in NZ and the US. I also teach classical studies, which has some Greek and Roman history, literature and art. So to keep up I'm always learning about new things, which is just how I like it.
Books mentioned in this topic
La Conquête du Holbourg: Aventures et amours d'un chevalier normand (other topics)The Golden Warrior (other topics)
The Dead King (other topics)
1066 Sons of Pons: In the Wake of the Conqueror (other topics)
The Last English King (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Helen Hollick (other topics)Berwick Coates (other topics)



The Last English King
And I have had this on my tbr for a while. Still haven't gotten to it;
Harold the King
which is also published under the name
I Am the Chosen King