The protesters discussion

15 views
Animal testing for makeup

Comments Showing 1-8 of 8 (8 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Leiko (new)

Leiko Xantara (arrogant_protector) Go Hannah! I completley agree!


message 2: by Phantom (new)

Phantom | 5 comments Mod
Interesting way of saying that.


message 3: by [deleted user] (new)

I agree.


message 4: by Carlie (last edited Dec 15, 2008 02:05PM) (new)

Carlie | 4 comments Against. Isn't it obvious how stupid testing makeup on animals is?

If it isn't to you, I'm not gonna bother cause it's not worth it.


message 5: by Carlie (new)

Carlie | 4 comments My comment is in response to the directions of this group which states we should explain why the other side is wrong. I can't bother explaining cause if you are actually for testing makeup on animals, there is something so fundamentally wrong with you, that there would be no point.


message 6: by Leiko (new)

Leiko Xantara (arrogant_protector) That is really good way of saying that!


message 7: by [deleted user] (new)

I don't think any of us have disagreed with this subject. How is this an argument for the protesters if no one disagrees.

I believe that if humans want to wear the stuff, that they should be tested with it themselves. You don't see dogs going around with make-up, well, unless their human room-mates are really that stupid, do you? NO! So what if you have an infection from the make-up, beauty hurts right? But sometimes what people don't understand is that beauty is more painful for the furry creatures.


message 8: by [deleted user] (new)

That is very true.


back to top