Gore and More discussion
Authors
>
Richard Laymon
date
newest »


My favourites (in order)
One Rainy Night(My first Laymon book and still my fave)
The Stake
Island
Night in the Lonesome October
Least favourite
Flesh
Fiends
I just thought i would mention i recently read

William, welcome to the group.
I also enjoyed "One Rainy Night", It read like a horror movie.
One Rainy Night
I just finished a Bryan Smith book, "Darkened". Not a bad book but not exactly great.
Darkened
Smith has been compared to Laymon for some time now. After reading Darkened I can say I see a bit of similarity, but just a bit.
I also enjoyed "One Rainy Night", It read like a horror movie.
One Rainy Night
I just finished a Bryan Smith book, "Darkened". Not a bad book but not exactly great.
Darkened
Smith has been compared to Laymon for some time now. After reading Darkened I can say I see a bit of similarity, but just a bit.

I really loved the beast house series.
I also enjoyed the island, although I didn't find it as captivating.
Jenny wrote: "I'm a huge fan. I've read all of his books that I've found in ebook format.
I really loved the beast house series.
I also enjoyed the island, although I didn't find it as captivating."
I read most of his books, I enjoyed The Island, but my favorites are One Rainy Night, In The Dark, The Traveling Vampire Show, and The Stake.
Body Rides was also very good.
I really loved the beast house series.
I also enjoyed the island, although I didn't find it as captivating."
I read most of his books, I enjoyed The Island, but my favorites are One Rainy Night, In The Dark, The Traveling Vampire Show, and The Stake.
Body Rides was also very good.


Now if I could only work up some enthusiasm for Ed Lee...
Hi Paul,
Im glad you enjoyed One Rainy Night.
Richard Laymon has a striped down, to the point style about his writing. Some people cant stand his prose, claiming he lacks character development and tends to drift towards unbelievable plot lines.
I find that these complaints are what makes Laymons books so fun to read. They come across as fast passed, B-rated horror novels, and this works well for me when reading guilty pleasures.
I just find Laymon books to be pure fun, and that's what it's all about when all is said and done.
Im glad you enjoyed One Rainy Night.
Richard Laymon has a striped down, to the point style about his writing. Some people cant stand his prose, claiming he lacks character development and tends to drift towards unbelievable plot lines.
I find that these complaints are what makes Laymons books so fun to read. They come across as fast passed, B-rated horror novels, and this works well for me when reading guilty pleasures.
I just find Laymon books to be pure fun, and that's what it's all about when all is said and done.

I loved The Stake.

Andrew wrote: "My best Laymon book to date has to be Body Rides. Just started Island and it's pretty average for me at the moment and 95 pages in...."
I enjoyed Island. I hope it picks up for you.
I enjoyed Island. I hope it picks up for you.

Island was the first book followed by Body Rides which pretty much got me hook on his work. After reading The Traveling Vampire Show I joined Leisure Book club and bought every Laymon books that I could get my hands on. I think I read about 10 of them. I just started collecting the Kindle editions.


But I agree with Shay about Night in the Lonesome October. I really LOVED that one. I could not put it down.

The Woods are Dark
Both totally over the top fun. Do NOT read if you are easily offended.
Laymon is the master of cheesy B-horror. Some people get a little uppity that the characters are shallow and the plot is thin and full of flaws, but that's the beauty of a B-movie. You don't rent them for Academy Award winning acting or script. The same is true for reading Laymon. He was one of the pioneer splatterpunks.


Just thought this bears repeating. A good story does make a B-movie better though.

Scott wrote: "I enjoy watching b-movies from time to time, but reading invests more time and effort, so I expect more."
There is nothing wrong with his prose and his stories move quick and for the most part fluid. The B-movie remarks are based on his splatter punk style. There are some over the top ideas showcased at times and the sex can be gratuitous, so if you are easily offended then I would say Laymon is not for you.
I have to be honest, if you are reading horror for ground breaking prose and new world views, then you are reading the wrong genre. I'm not saying there are no gifted writers in the field, there are a few, but this is not the place to hunt down the next great world renown writer.
I mostly read this genre for a get-away, escapism, the books are simple , guilty pleasures.
There is nothing wrong with his prose and his stories move quick and for the most part fluid. The B-movie remarks are based on his splatter punk style. There are some over the top ideas showcased at times and the sex can be gratuitous, so if you are easily offended then I would say Laymon is not for you.
I have to be honest, if you are reading horror for ground breaking prose and new world views, then you are reading the wrong genre. I'm not saying there are no gifted writers in the field, there are a few, but this is not the place to hunt down the next great world renown writer.
I mostly read this genre for a get-away, escapism, the books are simple , guilty pleasures.
D20 wrote: "Ken wrote: "but that's the beauty of a B-movie. You don't rent them for Academy Award winning acting or script."
Just thought this bears repeating. A good story does make a B-movie better though."
Have you read Laymon? His stories and ideas are his best gift, it's the character depth that seems a bit thin at times and can also be repetitive.
Just thought this bears repeating. A good story does make a B-movie better though."
Have you read Laymon? His stories and ideas are his best gift, it's the character depth that seems a bit thin at times and can also be repetitive.
Scott wrote: "Kevin wrote: "I have to be honest, if you are reading horror for ground breaking prose and new world views, then you are reading the wrong genre."
I don't agree at all; there are Great writers in ..."
Sorry, but I think otherwise. There are good writers in horror such as Gifune, Clive Barker, Bradbury, and maybe Simmons, but their work is not high literature nor is it intended to be.
Bryan Smith is adequate at best not to mention so many others. I'm not saying they can not write, but there is a HUGE difference between literary quality and pulp for the masses. Horror is and has been pulp for the masses since it's inception, though some have managed to take it to higher levels, Imajica comes to mind.
I think there is quality in horror but not on the level of high literature. Bradbury had a gift of making his prose dance and sing. A lyrical writer with colorful prose. A gifted story teller.
If you have ever read a Keeley review you would begin to understand the difference between academic and scholarly verse pulp for the masses, ( or at least get Keely's view on the subject). Although I have my differences with Keeley and disagree with many of his reviews, I do respect his views and great insight to literature as a whole.
Debatable? Possibly.
I don't agree at all; there are Great writers in ..."
Sorry, but I think otherwise. There are good writers in horror such as Gifune, Clive Barker, Bradbury, and maybe Simmons, but their work is not high literature nor is it intended to be.
Bryan Smith is adequate at best not to mention so many others. I'm not saying they can not write, but there is a HUGE difference between literary quality and pulp for the masses. Horror is and has been pulp for the masses since it's inception, though some have managed to take it to higher levels, Imajica comes to mind.
I think there is quality in horror but not on the level of high literature. Bradbury had a gift of making his prose dance and sing. A lyrical writer with colorful prose. A gifted story teller.
If you have ever read a Keeley review you would begin to understand the difference between academic and scholarly verse pulp for the masses, ( or at least get Keely's view on the subject). Although I have my differences with Keeley and disagree with many of his reviews, I do respect his views and great insight to literature as a whole.
Debatable? Possibly.
Scott wrote: "You're pretty condescending for someone who doesn't seem have read very widely in genre."
Really? Everything I have mentioned I have read and then some, and if you took the time to examine all 47 pages of books I have read you would have realized my folders are not updated, and by simply looking in my horror folder you have missed many, many books I have read inside and outside this genre, but I digress, I truly have no desire or need to go there, what would be the point?
Condescending? I guess if a person feels challenged by such trivial matters it may come across as such.
As I stated, it's all debatable for those up to the dull challenge of such a task. I for one rest my case and chose to move on.
If you do decide you would like to have an intelligent, peaceful conversation and refrain from ad hominem when you feel challenged, then feel free to add your thoughts here, but try to remain civil and make clear and precise points.
And thank you for calling me pretty, although my name is not Condescending, it's Kevin. :)
Really? Everything I have mentioned I have read and then some, and if you took the time to examine all 47 pages of books I have read you would have realized my folders are not updated, and by simply looking in my horror folder you have missed many, many books I have read inside and outside this genre, but I digress, I truly have no desire or need to go there, what would be the point?
Condescending? I guess if a person feels challenged by such trivial matters it may come across as such.
As I stated, it's all debatable for those up to the dull challenge of such a task. I for one rest my case and chose to move on.
If you do decide you would like to have an intelligent, peaceful conversation and refrain from ad hominem when you feel challenged, then feel free to add your thoughts here, but try to remain civil and make clear and precise points.
And thank you for calling me pretty, although my name is not Condescending, it's Kevin. :)


Can you give a link to Keeley? Do you mean someone on Goodreads or a reviewer elsewhere?
Erin ☕ *Proud Book Hoarder* wrote: "Sorry to say I'm not a Laymon fan, although it's clear he's well loved by the majority of horror readers. The one I enjoyed most was Endless Night. I've read about 5 of his books."
Some love him, some hate him. I know he is not for everyone.
Keeley has many reviews on this site with some great conversations among academics as well as the general population. You may disagree with many of his reviews but the conversations are intelligent and amusing.
If you look for George Martin's Game Of Thrones and skim through the reviews, you will find Keeley's 1 star review, and you can follow him from there.
Some love him, some hate him. I know he is not for everyone.
Keeley has many reviews on this site with some great conversations among academics as well as the general population. You may disagree with many of his reviews but the conversations are intelligent and amusing.
If you look for George Martin's Game Of Thrones and skim through the reviews, you will find Keeley's 1 star review, and you can follow him from there.

Books mentioned in this topic
After Midnight (other topics)Endless Night (other topics)
Endless Night (other topics)
The Woods Are Dark (other topics)
To Wake The Dead (other topics)
More...
If so, what is your favorite book from this author?