The Mystery, Crime, and Thriller Group discussion

This topic is about
Rex Stout
Favorite Authors/Books/Series
>
Nero Wolfe
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Albert
(new)
Aug 02, 2012 08:15AM

reply
|
flag


I am also fond of this series. I rotate the A&E presentation through my Netflix queue often, so that I can watch them again.
Just recently read Fer-de-Lance again and am ready to re-do the rest.


But, I "heard" Hutton, Chaykin and the whole gang as I was reading. I've never had that experience before, even with the Poirot books (I really enjoy David Suchet's portrayal of the character). It was like reading an audiobook ... or something. As a fan of both actors, particularly Hutton, I didn't altogether mind having their voices in my head. I was really surprised at how well the show had translated the books - they really captured the characters and the "feel" of the books.
Anyway, I loved the books - couldn't put them down. I am in the middle of a challenge with another group and I was supposed to be reading something on my list, but I just kept picking up another Nero Wolfe! I managed to stop after six, but I can't wait to read more of them.

I guess I missed it, but Jill wrote of buying the DVD
so I guess I will need the name. Is it worth it???????

But, I "heard" Hutton, Chaykin and the whole gang as ..."
I just recently started reading Them as we'll and my experience was similar to yours. The A and E series was superb visually and did bring the books alive. I now have them fixed in my brain while I read.

Rex Stout was a fascinating man as well, it seems. Legend has it that he would write the books straight through, from start to finish, sentence by sentence, having the entire plot fixed in his head, and not go back and change anything. It's said he would sit with his head on the typewriter and plan each sentence for as long as it would take, then continue on. When he reached the end, he was done. He had that kind of brain.
I've also read somewhere that he was an amazing math whiz, and as a kid in school, the students would turn him away from the blackboard, write a long series of numbers on it, and Stout would then turn around and say the answer in seconds.
Love stories like that.

And Glenn is right....the Wolfe books are an acquired taste. Some people hate the characters, hate the writing, don't think there is enough action, etc.......but not this reader. I love them.
Something Stout did that didn't back him into a corner was never aging his characters. Agatha Christie started both Miss Marple and Poirot at an advanced age and kept aging them as the books progressed. Wolfe and Archie never aged although the times changed around them. So we can always see them as they first appeared. I have not read the continuation books written after Stout's death and don't intend to. Has any one read them?


I find this to be more of a problem with Nero Wolfe than with other series characters, probably because so much of the drama takes place there in the brownstone. Archie has to go out and drag people in to see Nero, etc. That adds greatly to the sameness, I'm afraid.
I probably read one Nero a year, however, and that is the perfect antidote to the deja vu factor.

And Glenn is right....the Wolfe books are an acquired taste. Some pe..."
I read them. They were OK, AS STAND ALONES, But as part of the series didn't quite match-up!


Stout Fellow: A Guide Through Nero Wolfe's World by O.E. McBride.
It is very well done and frankly, I like it much better that the usually accepted "biography":
Nero Wolfe of West Thirty-fifth Street: The Life and Times of America's Largest Private Detective by William S. Baring-Gould

Great point, Steve. I find that same problem with the Sherlock Holmes stories. When continuing characters have particular quirks which make them unique, they can begin to grate on the nerves if taken in large doses!!

True, there's a sameness to the city-based cases, although the few variations when Wolfe is forced to leave to house provide a good break in the monotony. The trip to the dude ranch and Wolfe's reactions to being out if his element are very entertaining. In many ways, he is almost a precursor to Adrian Monk in these installments.

That is why a spread things around. If I read Nero this week, I might go with Sherlock or Travis McGee next week -- along with a lot of non-mystery reading in between, too. Time between a serial detective's adventures sure helps freshen things up.

I think this is true of many series it gets to the point where the author knows they must include such common themes, antics, etc. otherwise their faithful readers will be disappointed.
Recently I was enjoying Lisa Lutz Spellman's books but I needed a break but the temptation is that you enjoy the first so much you rush to read the 2nd. So I try to force myself to wait on #3 of a series.
By the same token do you sometimes read a book in a series and have lukewarm feelings but decide to give #2 a chance?

never heard of Travis McGee...





It differed, most;y, because it was the last.


For me it wasn't the fact that it was the last of Stout's Wolfe book but the identity of the villain and how it affected the continuing characters. There was a sadness about it and a real twist about how the villain met his end.

I agree with Kari.....often the first book is not the best of a series. I read the Marjorie Allingham books featuring Albert Campion and the first one made me grit my teeth. I couldn't understand Campion at all.....he was silly and just wandered through the story seemingly without purpose. But there was something that made me read another of the series and pretty soon I was hooked. So sometimes you have to give an author another chance.
But that can come back to bite you as well.....I read a book by an author that I won't mention.( I don't think we ought to trash writers since it is a personal opinion)...but the first book was interesting, so I searched out the second. It was the dumbest book I have ever read....the story line was idiotic, the characters were unbelievable, and it was generally amateurish. You just never know.

The sadness was the reason it was not my favorite, plus I liked Orrie. At least a little.

Do you find as well that some writers, who start off writing nice compact nicely flowing stories, when they hit it a bit big now seem to feel that they need make their stories clunky and wordy?



On the other hand, pastiche authors have to put food on the table, so more power to them if they can make money by writing. I just prefer not to read the pastiches, that's all.

I agree Steve, but have to admit that I have read a couple of Sherlock Holmes continuation books and especially liked Dust and Shadow: An Account of the Ripper Killings by Dr. John H. Watson by Lyndsay Faye. But I won't be reading any Wolfe pastiches....I'll just leave the brownstone house as Stout left it.........and then re-read them one more time!!




Worth a listen if you haven't already.

Books mentioned in this topic
The Nero Wolfe Cookbook (other topics)Dust and Shadow: An Account of the Ripper Killings by Dr. John H. Watson (other topics)
A Family Affair (other topics)
A Family Affair (other topics)
A Family Affair (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Lyndsay Faye (other topics)Lisa Lutz (other topics)
O.E. McBride (other topics)
William S. Baring-Gould (other topics)