Mark

“day, us. That the Bible's been saying so all along, clay being what Genesis meant by the "dust of the ground" that formed man, is obvious. What is not so obvious is how often we have been saying it to one another, and without knowing it.”
― Zecharia Sitchin, Genesis Revisited: Is Modern Science Catching Up With Ancient Knowledge?

“Ordinary clay, it seems, has two basic properties essential to life. It can store energy and also transmit it. So, the scientists reason, clay could have acted as a "chemical factory" for turning inorganic raw materials into more complex molecules. Out of those complex molecules arose life—and, one”
― Zecharia Sitchin, Genesis Revisited: Is Modern Science Catching Up With Ancient Knowledge?

“from publicly available documents. But now it is also evident that when the mists of leaks, rumors, and denials are pierced, if not the public, then the world's leaders have been aware for some time first, that there is one more planet in our Solar System and second, that we are not alone.”
― Zecharia Sitchin, Genesis Revisited: Is Modern Science Catching Up With Ancient Knowledge?

“The biblical tale of Man's creation is, of course, the crux of the debate—at times bitter—between Creationists and Evolutionists and of the ongoing confrontation between them—at times in courts, always on school boards. As previously stated, both sides had better read the Bible again (and in its Hebrew original);”
― Zecharia Sitchin, Genesis Revisited: Is Modern Science Catching Up With Ancient Knowledge?