“In opposition to the absolutely and directly false Heideggerian theses attributing to Aquinas an onto-theo-logical metaphysics of Being, Aquinas's actual and genuine conception of God is articulated in the famous formulation according to which God is ipsum esse per se subsistens, Being itself subsisting through itself.
God is not a being (ens,) among other beings, thus not anything like the highest, first, or maximal being.
(p. 43)”
―
God is not a being (ens,) among other beings, thus not anything like the highest, first, or maximal being.
(p. 43)”
―
“I, like many, if not most, specialists working on pentateuchal formation now, do not recognize an 'Elohist' counterpart to the older 'Yahwist.'
Whatever pre-Priestly proto-Pentateuch I would consider would be one that contains texts once assigned to J and E. Furthermore, I am inclined to date any non-P proto-Pentateuch no earlier than the late preexilic or (more likely) exilic period.
My pre-Priestly 'proto-Pentateuch' is close to the older J neither in contents or context. The only way I am a proponent of a 'Yahwist' is if one reduces the definition of such a document as Jan Christian Gertz does to those who posit a 'running strand of pre-Priestly material in the Tetratech.'
That definition, however, makes the term 'Yahwist' so different from the older use of the term as to make it functionally nonusable.
In fact, no one on this panel, so far as I know, advocates a Yahwist recognizably like the J of studies up through the 1970s.
(David Carr essay, p. 160)”
― Farewell to the Yahwist?: The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation
Whatever pre-Priestly proto-Pentateuch I would consider would be one that contains texts once assigned to J and E. Furthermore, I am inclined to date any non-P proto-Pentateuch no earlier than the late preexilic or (more likely) exilic period.
My pre-Priestly 'proto-Pentateuch' is close to the older J neither in contents or context. The only way I am a proponent of a 'Yahwist' is if one reduces the definition of such a document as Jan Christian Gertz does to those who posit a 'running strand of pre-Priestly material in the Tetratech.'
That definition, however, makes the term 'Yahwist' so different from the older use of the term as to make it functionally nonusable.
In fact, no one on this panel, so far as I know, advocates a Yahwist recognizably like the J of studies up through the 1970s.
(David Carr essay, p. 160)”
― Farewell to the Yahwist?: The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation
“The line between actual killing and verbal, symbolic, or imaginary violence is thin and permeable. The threat of violence is a method of forceful coercion, even if no blood is actually shed.”
― Does the Bible Justify Violence?
― Does the Bible Justify Violence?
“As One and Unique, and yet as one who is to be understood only in the context of mankind's entire history and in the context of the whole created cosmos, Jesus is the Word, the Image, the Expression and the Exegesis of God.”
― Seeing the Form
― Seeing the Form
Mark’s 2024 Year in Books
Take a look at Mark’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Polls voted on by Mark
Lists liked by Mark





















