Blake Giusti > Recent Status Updates

“Mainstream cancer research suggests that 1/3 of all cancers could be eliminated through lifestyle
Changes. Yet, National cancer institute (NCI) spent just $1MM (or 0.2% of its budget) in 2005 on education, press releases, and PR to encourage better eating habits to prevent cancer.”

Merck’s Swine flu vaccine was recalled. They have insufficiently tested vaccines out in the past.

Mike Wallace “sixty minutes” 1997 “… mercilessly exposed the corruption, I️ competence, and cover-ups at HHS that led to phony swine flu pandemic and the wave of casualties from the NIH’s experimental vaccine.”

They’ve done it before…

2000 CDC study concluded nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among US Children occurred before 1940s when few antibiotics and vaccines were available. “Thus vaccination doesn’t does not account for the decline.”

There’s a mountain of evidence here. RFK doesn’t have much (anything?) to gain by trying to take on big pharma, Fauci, and Bill Gates.

Everyone can find data to support their arguments. I️ do believe American MSM and big corporations are willing and able to lie.

The actions and timelines align with malicious activity. They had every incentive to lie and I️ think they did

I️ don’t agree with 100% of RFK’s interpretations and conclusions based on the data. But the point still stands. This is a shady system and the Covid vaccine was at least more dangerous than we were led to believe*

*we were told it was 100% safe and had no side effects and all men, women and children should get the vaccine or else!

Corrupt institutions can still do good. I️ don’t think being corrupt tarnishes all work.

That being said, there is corruption here, period. Former acting head of the CDC owning over $1B in JNJ stock all but confirms some sort of corruption. The dots aren’t quite connected yet, but they’re right there in this particular case.

Rotten

Whole thing is fishy. I️ don’t think you need to believe everything RFK says in the book to intuitively know that this is fishy. I️ happen to think the majority of what he’s saying is true. There’s probably a lot of missing context to help him make his argument; welcome to debate.

But even if only 10% of this is true, there was something wrong here. I️ know there was.

The “horse dewormer” thing the media did is radicalizing.

No matter how you feel about IVM’s effectiveness against Covid, the coordinated condescending message the media put out that IVM is some random novel “horse drug” is damning.

At worst, IVM doesn’t work against Covid. Period. It’s been an approved drug for many years. The war on a previously touted safe drug is damning. It just is.

I️ also think it’s worth discussing that Merck has a very season legal obligation. Their obligation is to their shareholders and they are bound by US law to do what’s best for their shareholders.

“Table the low margin, patent-expired drug and get to work on new stuff!!!” - board/shareholders, probably

Again, even if you don’t believe any of the data, we all HAVE TO AGREE on the fact that if there was a big pharma conspiracy by money hungry individuals at the top, this is EXACTLY what it would look it.

At this point the real data is almost ancillary. The timeline and actions taken almost prove corruption alone. Both of these drugs get taken off shelves despite medical doctors prescribing them?? Too many coincidences for me.

You can’t say the novel vaccine is definitely safe because we’ve tested it while simultaneously saying, “I️ know we’ve said IVM/HCQ have been safe for decades, but our safety testing wasn’t comprehensive.”

So you have failed to do comprehensive safety testing for a drug that’s been approved for decades, but we have to trust you that ~these~ safety tests were all great.

I️ can’t buy that.

Ivermectin and HCQ have been boasted as safe and effective for decades. Then randomly in 2021 both IVM and HCQ manufacturers discovered “a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of their studies.”

So are we saying COVID’s vaccine is definitely safe and effective bc we tested it? OR are we saying we’ve erroneously called IVM/HCQ safe and effective for decades?

Quick note on the politics of it because it’s fascinating.

Liberal progressives have always been the party who question big companies and better understand and discuss the fact that American companies are more than willing to put their profit before the general safety of the people.

This is so backwards. Right wingers complaining about the unchecked power of power. Liberals teaming up with big business.

Have we ever seen pharmacies refusing to fill prescriptions?

The Covid vaccine would not have been allowed to be administered the way it was if there were any other effective drugs. This would’ve taken away the emergency status of the vaccine.

I️ think doctors are allowed to prescribe FDA-approved drugs to patients as they deem fit.

I️ think ivermectin was prescribed more during the pandemic than it had been in the preceding years. (Chart on page 56 indicates this)

Thus there were licensed medical doctors who believed ivermectin was helping.

Why was there a war waged on IVM?

The systematic war against IVM and HCQ only makes sense with corruption. “Emergency use” vaccine bit for COVID vax doesn’t play if there are other available alternatives that treat COVID.

So you must discredit them if you want anyone to take the vaccine. Why do American studies still show HCQ and IVM are not effective vs. COVID when there’s this other mountain of evidence that suggests otherwise??

What great dialogue from the recorded zoom call. Dr. Lawrie’s monologue on page 54 is solid.

There are very clearly well educated, qualified experts on both sides of the IVM conversation. Though only one side has a clearly vested financial interest in the outcome of studies on IVM. The doctors studying and calling for the use of IVM don’t get anything out of it. It seems they just want to save more lives.

RFK claims among other things, the studies targeted a population that was already using IVM. This means their “control group” could’ve also been taking IVM. Perhaps a stretch… but remember that these studies are in the VAST MINORITY when it comes to showing IVM efficacy.

If not a bad trial/study, what else could explain this?

Bill Gates was funding the “together trial” testing IVM, HCQ against Covid.

The conflicts of interest are multiplying!!

There is inherently a conflict of interest for any pharma company/investor to test IVM and HCQ. They have a very vested interest in the failures of those drugs. Motive and conflicts do not prove intent or maliciousness, but there should be heavy scrutiny here.

Seems like Dr. Lawrie has an open meta analysis of data and the WHO wanted no part of it.

The Cochran collaboration exists for a reason. “British and Scandinavian scientists founded (it) in 1993 to address pharma industry corruption that had become pervasive in clinical trials for new drugs.”

Thinking there is zero corruption in big pharma indicates a naivety on money, big business, corruption, and Pharma.

Utarr Pradesh effectively beat COVID with a vaccination rate of 5.8%.

Through August of 2021, this Indian state(?) had 1000 times less deaths than the US per capita.

*I️’d also point out that I’m not sure I️ believe the number of US deaths being attributed to COVID

April 20, 2021: India added ivm to national protocol.

Again we can get into a data war here. Can we trust the Indian media? I’m reading that New Delhi had a covid surge and 97% of cases were “obliterated by IVM.” Anecdotal evidence I️ guess.

It’s confirmed by multiple doctors, national, and local news networks that COVID protocol including IVM dropped cases “dramatically.”

There’s also a conversation to be had about clinical trials vs. meta analysis. Tough to really trust anything I️ suppose. Clinical studies are easy to mess with. Meta data is almost equally as easy to mess with. Tell me the story you want and I’ll find the data to support it.

But I️ do give deference to meta analysis of a large data set. I️ think it’s more trustworthy than one group’s study.