Dante Fowler > Recent Status Updates

I started this about six months ago, but stalled due to other reading commitments. Now that I am back in its midst I find I had already forgotten much of what I'd read, not uncommon for me these days. But there is a lot. Though it's very readable, it's quite dense and the ideas, both Blake's and Higgs', require some consideration.

I started this about six months ago, but stalled due to other reading commitments. Now that I am back in its midst I find I had already forgotten much of what I'd read, not uncommon for me these days. But there is a lot. Though it's very readable, it's quite dense and the ideas, both Blake's and Higgs', require some consideration.

I started this about six months ago, but stalled due to other reading commitments. Now that I am back in its midst I find I had already forgotten much of what I'd read, not uncommon for me these days. But there is a lot. Though it's very readable, it's quite dense and the ideas, both Blake's and Higgs', require some consideration.

I read some of Delillo's books many years ago: Libra, White Noise; both of which I recall being gripping. I read Underworld about the time it was published and my recollection is that it was underwhelming. Mao II I find I simply too abstruse to be engaging. Some of the prose is wonderful and unwrapping it is the means to engaging with Delillo, not the narrative, but reallly it's a bit of a bore.