I really think Mounk has a point and that the current social importance of "identity" is misguided and counterproductive, but to me any clear argument gets lost in poor citation practice and weird unfounded blanket statements about "the adherents/advocates of the identity synthesis": "Most advocates of the identity synthesis believe X", "Some writers emphasize both Y and Z". Where are the stats? Which writers??
— Jun 26, 2024 01:18AM
Add a comment