I’m at the point where I have to consider if DNF is my option. If the thesis of the book is entirely dependent on the initial propositions argued in the first several chapters, and if those propositions are not successfully established (they are not), then is there any value exploring the subsequent propositions-the validity of which hangs on the veracity of what came before?
I truly expected better.
— Jul 29, 2026 07:20PM
Add a comment