James > Recent Status Updates

As I read, though not finished, I thought I'd ad a note as I'm going along. On p. 120, the author claims that gay apologists shouldn't have to defend their position if they're so convinced they're right, equating it to his preference for dark-haired women. Sorry, buddy, but it isn't the same. Gay apologists have been under attack since they started, hence their perceived need to defend against the attacks!

So far, a difficult read. Deep, wide and long in scope, I struggle to get through the material but I know there's "good stuff" toward the end. I don't want to cheat and pick up there; rather, I plow through. He anticipates "wokeness" (though not by name), but mistakenly says that there have been no battles of principles since slavery. There have been, mainly on abortion.

This isn't a very readable book. I'm starting to skim, and it may not be long before I just give up. He rambles on and on and on...