Discover new books on Goodreads
See if your friends have read any of Axel Michaels's books
Axel Michaels
|
Hinduism: Past and Present
by
—
published
1998
—
12 editions
|
|
|
Nepal: A History from the Earliest Times to the Present
—
published
2024
—
2 editions
|
|
|
Klassiker der Religionswissenschaft: Von Friedrich Schleiermacher bis Mircea Eliade
—
published
1997
—
2 editions
|
|
|
Buddha: Leben, Lehre, Legende
—
published
2011
—
4 editions
|
|
|
Homo Ritualis: Hindu Ritual and Its Significance for Ritual Theory
—
published
2015
—
5 editions
|
|
|
Die Kunst des einfachen Lebens: eine Kulturgeschichte der Askese
—
expected publication
20014
|
|
|
Images of the Body in India: South Asian and European Perspectives on Rituals and Performativity
by
—
published
2011
—
7 editions
|
|
|
The making of a statue: Lost-wax casting in Nepal
|
|
|
Der Hinduismus: Geschichte und Gegenwart (Beck Paperback 6520) (German Edition)
|
|
|
Emotions in Rituals and Performances: South Asian and European Perspectives on Rituals and Performativity
by
—
published
2012
—
6 editions
|
|
“From this perspective, the phrase often heard in India—“all the same”—signifies not a lack of conceptual acuity or an exaggerated need for leveling, but rather a code of Hindu religious identity and a basic form of the Identificatory Habitus. The concept of habitus has the advantage of not reducing the “whole,” on the one hand, while preventing an overemphasis on details, the places, the historical uniqueness, on the other.19 It thus counters a favorite objection against comprehensive analyses of Hinduism, that they cannot encompass the multiplicity of India because they want to know either too much or too little: too much because they see one single thought prevailing everywhere; too little because, for the sake of particular principles, there is much they overlook.”
― Hinduism: Past and Present
― Hinduism: Past and Present
“in this, however, is not only a matter of a convincing argument, but also of æsthetics. In a certain respect, the Identificatory Habitus is only old wine in new bottles. Indian society has repeatedly been defined as holistic, encompassing the opposites, inclusive, integrative, producing similarities—by Max Weber, Louis Dumont, Paul Hacker, Jan Heesterman, McKim Marriott, Sudhir Kakar, Brian K. Smith, and others. They have all emphasized another soul, structure, way of thinking, or code with regard to India. They have all tried to grasp the “essence” of India. The danger of constructing and imagining such a personal India—the main criticism of Ronald Inden27—is certainly not to be denied, nor is the danger of seeing this other India as a deviation from the West or drawing an overly harmonious image of India: Women or Untouchables see the alleged solidarity of the caste system less harmoniously than Dumont does.28 But anyone who intends to avoid completely the danger of Orientalism, and”
― Hinduism: Past and Present
― Hinduism: Past and Present
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Axel to Goodreads.

