Christopher Janaway
Website
Genre
Influences
Christopher Janaway isn't a Goodreads Author
(yet),
but they
do have a blog,
so here are some recent posts imported from
their feed.
|
Schopenhauer: A Very Short Introduction
—
published
1994
—
35 editions
|
|
|
The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer
—
published
1999
|
|
|
Beyond Selflessness: Reading Nietzsche's Genealogy
—
published
2007
—
5 editions
|
|
|
Reading Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art: Selected Texts with Interactive Commentary
—
published
2005
—
7 editions
|
|
|
Images of Excellence: Plato's Critique of the Arts
—
published
1995
—
9 editions
|
|
|
Willing and Nothingness: Schopenhauer as Nietzsche's Educator
—
published
1998
—
3 editions
|
|
|
Essays on Schopenhauer and Nietzsche: Values and the Will of Life
|
|
|
Nietzsche, Naturalism, and Normativity
by
—
published
2012
|
|
|
Self and World in Schopenhauer's Philosophy
—
published
1989
—
8 editions
|
|
|
Schopenhauer - Dusuncenin Ustalari
|
|
“The will has no overall purpose, aims at no highest good, and can never be satisfied. Although it is our essence, it strikes us as an alien agency within, striving for life and procreation blindly, mediated only secondarily by consciousness. Instinctive sexuality is at our core, interfering constantly with the life of the intellect. To be an individual expression of this will is to lead a life of continual desire, deficiency, and suffering. Pleasure or satisfaction exists only relative to a felt lack; it is negative, merely the cessation of an episode of striving or suffering, and has no value of itself. Nothing we can achieve by conscious act of will alters the will to life within us. There is no free will. Human actions, as part of the natural order, are determined [....] As individual parts of the empirical world we are ineluctably pushed through life by a force inside us which is not of our choosing, which gives rise to needs and desires we can never fully satisfy, and is without ultimate purpose. Schopenhauer concludes that it would have been better not to exist—and that the world itself is something whose existence we should deplore rather than celebrate.”
―
―
“He [Nietzsche] opposes transcendent metaphysics, whether that of Plato or Christianity or Schopenhauer. He rejects notions of the immaterial soul, the absolutely freecontrolling will, or the self-transparent pure intellect, instead emphasizing the body,talking of the animal nature of human beings, and attempting to explain numerous phenomena by invoking drives, instincts, and affects which he locates in our physical, bodily existence. Human beings are to be “translated back into nature,” since otherwise we falsify their history, their psychology, and the nature of their values — concerning all of which we must know truths, as a means to the all-important revaluation of values. This is Nietzsche's naturalism in the broad sense, which will not be contested here.”
― Beyond Selflessness: Reading Nietzsche's Genealogy
― Beyond Selflessness: Reading Nietzsche's Genealogy
Topics Mentioning This Author
| topics | posts | views | last activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur Schopenhauer: Which Schopenhauer books/translations would you recommend? | 2 | 9 | Dec 04, 2018 05:08PM | |
| Arthur Schopenhauer: Let's Chat | 17 | 6 | Dec 11, 2018 12:48PM |
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Christopher to Goodreads.



















