Abhijit Naskar's Blog - Posts Tagged "holy-book"

Naskarism, Marxism, Buddhism, Sufism, Confucianism, Christianism, Judaism, it’s all human construct.” Abhijit Naskar, The Divine Refugee

Best way apes know to make sure nobody questions their words is to call them divine intervention, rather than human creation. But if you could transcend the primitive instinct of connecting divinity with the supernatural, you would plainly see, human creation is divine creation – human intervention is the most divine it gets. That is why, my creations are divine creation, but that divinity is firmly rooted in my own consciousness – not in some imaginary heaven, but in my own organic and very much mortal human brain.

Quran, Bible, Vedas – it’s all human creation, no matter how much their proponents peddle them otherwise. Sure, they have a divine element to them, hence, there is good in them, but that divinity, that goodness, is rooted in humans, not in some anthropomorphic supernatural deity.

Naskarism, Marxism, Buddhism, Sufism, Confucianism, Christianism, Judaism, it’s all human construct. As such, none of it is infallible. Yours truly admits that, so did my friend Sid (Buddha), as well as my brother Mevlana (Rumi). And what’s wrong with acknowledging the possibility of folly anyway! It is only through folly that fervor unfolds – it is only through mistakes that the mind expands.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter

“No Literature is Infallible.” ― Abhijit Naskar, Iftar-e Insaniyat: The First Supper


No literature is infallible, but while errors in scientific literature are proudly mended by later scientists, errors in religious literature are rarely mended – they are interpreted, reinterpreted, and justified in a million ways, but never questioned, as very few persons of faith have got the brain and backbone to acknowledge errors, let alone correct them – this is not holiness, it’s blindness most primitive.

Reverence without revision isn’t sanctity, it’s stagnation – and stagnation might feel honorous, but it leads to devolution. Just because it’s habit doesn’t make it holy – admission of error is the beginning of enlightenment.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter