Stephen Trujillo's Blog

Tiresome Thomas Schoenberger
CoronaVirus Updates (Thomas Schoenberger), "Esteban Trujillo de Gutierrez is a mentally ill stalker," YouTube , May 11, 2020. 
Does it strike no one else as weird that Thomas Schoenberger, upon learning about the existence of a website chronicling his legal misadventures, his frauds, and his deceits, responds by claiming that I am behind it? And more, that I am a “mentally ill stalker?”
(Thomas Schoenberger Exposed: www.thomas-schoenberger-felon.com). 
Does no one else think it weird that Thomas Schoenberger’s reaction to Jacquelyn Weaver’s “The Day of Diminishing Capacity: Thomas Schoenberger Threatens and Marcus Conte Makes False Allegations,” on her Tracking the Leopard Meroz website (May 10, 2020), is to threaten to contact her family members to ask whether Ms. Weaver suffers any mental illness? 
Schoenberger never responds with counterargument and counter-fact. He immediately goes low, and he fights dirty. Now, he claims that Rebecca Morgan taking her Twitterfeed down for a break, a break that I misinterpreted as a suspension, is an example of me lying. 

No, you adolescent dumbass: that is an example of me making a mistake. We all make them. You making a video featuring that mistake as grounds to dismiss the accumulated facts and documentation about your criminal career merely illustrates your simplicity. 
But why the dirty fighting? Why the felonious tortious interference? Why the criminal harassment? Why the threats? Why the amateur psychological warfare, coming up with silly pychiatric profiles that reveal your own ignorance? Thomas Schoenberger is outclassed, his lack of expertise is glaring, and his inadequacies just make him look stupid. 
Here is a fact: Thomas Schoenberger is out of facts, he has no facts, he does nothing more than hurl ad hominem curses and accusations that are full of sound and fury, but ultimately vacuous, signifying nothing. 
In a recent YouTube video, “Esteban Trujillo de Gutierrez is a mentally ill stalker,” the only thing that Schoenberger gets right is my name. 
I was involved with the website that so perturbed Thomas Schoenberger. I was aware of it early, and I contributed writing to it. Various statements that I made on my Samizdat YouTube channel appear on it, videos produced and hosted on my channel appear there, as do excerpts from other writers like Stinky Steve Outtrim, Jimmy’s Llama, Jacquelyn Weaver, and Dave Acton. Mostly critics of Thomas Schoenberger, and a few who are not. 
www.youtube.com/SamizdatYouTube: with 783 organic subscribers, and content devoted to Cicada 3301. 

Multiple lawsuits naming Thomas Schoenberger are hosted there, as are his criminal records, including his felony convictions for stalking (that Elizabeth Vering claims do not exist), and the names of his multiple victims and the identities of his co-conspirators in the Schoenberger Crew. They are all collected there, in one place, for the convenience of prosecutors building their cases. 
Searching on the terms "Thomas Schoenberger Felon" brings up fascinating results. 

Claiming that I am behind this website is more credit than I deserve. If I, indeed, held such authority over the site, it would still be up and running. After the FBI and a particular AUSA were appraised of the site and its contents, after they captured needed materials hosted there, the site mysteriously went black. Schoenberger acts like he took it down, he pretends that something that he did precipitated its end. 
No. That site exposed Schoenberger. Jacquelyn Weaver long ago counseled him to create such a site, even just a blog, to explain himself to the world. Schoenberger is too lazy, too inept, to do so, he lacks basic skills. He does not even write on his own blog. I suspect that this is because Schoenberger is a poor writer and he knows it. Unless someone like Iona Miller is around to edit his writing, Schoenberger's grammatical inadequacies are impossible to mask. 
And so what? Not everybody can write like Jacquelyn Weaver. One problem is that Schoenberger calls himself a writer, he calls himself “rogue historian,” when someone else already owns that name. The fundamental thing that Schoenberger is, is a liar. Schoenberger never claims to be a liar. He should. Nobody lies better than he. 
It turns out that SEO is not one of Thomas Schoenberger's talents or categories of expertise after all. We own him. 

Instead, Schoenberger makes ineffective videos on his MacBook, huddled in a dingy room, dreading every knock at the door. He rarely includes even a solitary graphic or photo. Just a black screen, and the rasping voice of the liar, his statements punctuated by an intermittent and productive, malignant cough, talking to himself. Indeed, frequently ranting to himself. 
No, this looks like no Motel 6 to me. It has a look of permanence to it. This is his hovel. 

Jacqueline Weaver waited for Schoenberger to create such a site. He emailed her a thousand times, trying to persuade her that he was wronged, that he was victimized. She disagreed with him, he utterly failed to persuade her, and she repeatedly counseled him to make a site or a blog to prove his case. He failed to do so. 
So we did it. 
“We.” 
Not, “I.” 
We. 
We did it. We now control the site that documents the narrative of Thomas Schoenberger's life. 
Schoenberger’s response, of course, is to say that he is a composer and a pianist. More lies. No one ever saw him play on video. He claims that his compositions were performed by the Moscow Chamber Orchestra, and in the Uffizi Gallery Museum. 

Show me the website articles stating the dates. Show me a handbill. Show me a video clip of even ten seconds of either performance. Show me an announcement, or a news article, in Russian or Italian any other language. Show me any evidence that either event ever happened—any evidence. 
www.uffizi.org v. www.uffizi.it/en. And no, his music was not performed in the Uffizi. That was yet another scam. 

Schoenberger shows none. Because there is none. Thomas Schoenberger is a serial, chronic fabulist, a spectacular liar, whose response when challenged is to lie more, and to lie ever larger. When Thomas Schoenberger’s statements are examined, two things immediately stand out. 
One, the paucity of facts, and two, the enormity and the abundance of his lies. Schoenberger is a fact-free liar, the most ineffective kind. His criticisms about me in particular are ad hominem and libelous. 

Schoenberger defames me to no end. According to him, I weigh 371 pounds. I raped Iraqi mothers and girls. I worked for Blackwater. I smuggled cocaine. I am a CIA officer. I consort with pedophiles. I am a Satanist. 


371 lbs? I do not think so. 

Ah. I almost forgot. He claims that I am a methadone addict, that I am under psychiatric care, that I am prone to "PTSD rages," and that I see a psychiatrist weekly. 

I did see a therapist for many years after marrying my third wife. I wanted the relationship to succeed, and we remain married now, and happy, after 13 years together. Seeing a therapist for me was a good decision, and I do not regret it. Schoenberger can bludgeon me with it all that he likes. None of his criticisms have any impact. 


I hope that Elizabeth Vering did write these words. I suspect that it was Schoenberger. Bangkok Station is appraised.

The allegations made by his sock account Elizabeth Vering are more insane. She claims that CIA Bangkok Station runs a "Brownstone pedophile sex op" to compromise "pedophile businessmen." I am fairly certain that it was actually Thomas Schoenberger writing those words, using her YouTube account, but it does not matter. Bangkok Station is appraised. They are not pleased. Will there be consequences? Interesting question. Consequences could take many forms. 
Schoenberger switches up his Twitter accounts, currently using @holliday_jolly. Twitter User ID: 1213364789017104385.

My point is this: not one of these statements is true. 
Many observers note that Schoenberger appears to project, that what he says about others, is often true about he, himself. 
Take that title of one of his latest videos, “Esteban Trujillo de Gutierrez is a mentally ill stalker.” As I said, the only true element of the statement is my name. Readers of my work can sense whether I am mentally ill or not. 

I am, as I say on this website, Magic Kingdom Dispatch, clinically disabled. I am a veteran of combat, disabled with honorable wounds. I make no secret of it, I am not ashamed of my wounds—but neither would it be correct to say that I am proud of them, either. 
Such wounds happen to a soldier when he is not quite smart enough or fast enough or lucky enough or tough enough. He or she survives, but not unscathed. It turns out that there are millions of us combat survivors, veterans. I am proud to be one of them. When asked, I share details of my service. I am glad to help others if they can learn anything from my experiences. But “mentally ill?” Sorry, no. 
As for “stalker?” I said elsewhere that I myself and Thomas Schoenberger’s multiple victims and critics are angry with him. We increasingly talk amongst ourselves, and we share details that we think can assist one another. This is not “stalking.” 

Stalking is what the master projectionist Thomas Schoenberger does. Proof? Two felony convictions for stalking, dated 2011. Does Schoenberger enjoy any comparable evidence of my own mental psychosis, or any evidence that I am a stalker? 
It is one thing to call somebody a "stalker," and another to charge it in a criminal complaint backed up with facts. 

No. Because none exists. 
That problematic website, Thomas Schoenberger Exposed, at www.thomas-schoenberger-felon.com, collects those details. If it were my site, if I controlled it, it would be up and running at this time. For reasons beyond my control, it is now dark. 

I envision that it will go back online in the near future, after certain edits, as a living archive of changeable data on Schoenberger and his co-conspirators. Lawyers and prosecutors ultimately control the shots in a legal dispute. Not former airborne Rangers. 
But let us examine the sequential lies of Thomas Schoenberger, in this last, absurd black-screened video made on May 11, 2020. 

A. Schoenberger claims that he went to the host of the site Thomas Schoenberger Exposed. Does he include the link? Does he include a screen shot? Does he include any evidence whatsoever? No. 

Even I, who was involved in the production of this website, even I do not know where it is hosted. A hacker that I asked to penetrate the site failed, complimenting us on its security, noting that it was hosted in Russia. Russia? I did not know. I had no idea. I do not know who is hosting that site. 

In fact, this is what that hacker said, when I asked him if I could be connected to the site, after I saw that Thomas Schoenberger accused me of making it:
“Hey, I got your email from yesterday. Sorry, I had a really busy weekend. Thomas is full of himself. The website is NOT tied to you. I cannot find anything connected to the website that has your name on it, then or now. The only person in his mind that would be angry enough to do this and to spend the money and time… well, that would be you. LOL. You are his prime suspect. But tying you to the creation of the website would be impossible.”
Whom do you believe? Anyone who makes a website knows that it is impossible to perfectly hide, completely, who makes it. Hackers know that determining the hand behind a site is an important fact, and prosecutors will always require investigators to identify the responsible parties. 

I say that I did not make it. Thomas Schoenberger claims that I did. He provides no evidence. I confess that I contributed to it, but no more. It was not my site. I did not make it all by myself. 

B. Schoenberger claims that he was “able to get the material in front of law enforcement.” Really? No one bearing a badge has been in contact with me on behalf of Thomas Schoenberger. Ever. 

In fact, I advised an FBI agent that Thomas Schoenberger illegally used his name as a shield. Guess what happened? Prosecutors made a note of the claim, and then Schoenberger suddenly and mysteriously ceased mentioning his law enforcement “shield.”

C. Does Schoenberger refer to his mysterious “former feds” that he mentioned previously? If so, so what? I am pleased to talk to any cop. Any fed, any state cop, any municipal cop, any law enforcement whatsoever, retired or serving. That invitation remains open. 

Perhaps their reticence derives from the likelihood that Schoenberger will be indicted, and they prefer not to be implicated as co-conspirators. Even retired police remain bound by their oaths. But yet again, we encounter what appears to be just one more lie. 

D. Then Schoenberger claims that he made his fourth phone call to the Veterans Administration in Orlando, FL, where I receive my medical care--and on a Sunday. Great! Any evidence? Any recordings? Care to identify even one person, or an office? 

Any screen shots? Any proof whatsoever that this is not just one more fake statement trying to scare me? No. Not one iota of evidence. Consequently, I am not even annoyed. I am grateful, in fact, that Schoenberger claimed to commit yet another felony. 

E. Schoenberger claims that I am trying to “hustle the US government into giving him (me) more money while he stalks people.” All that this statement does is confirm for me that Schoenberger is not talking to anybody at the VA. 

Not that it is anybody's business, but I do receive a disability pension, based on a disability rating that was arrived at through a long, detailed process. That process took years. My rating is not under any appeal. 

I am grateful for the pension that I receive. I am not “hustling the US government to give me more money.” Yet again, we catch Thomas Schoenberger in just one more lie. But Thomas Schoenberger attempting to interfere with my pension is a felony. 

F. Schoenberger claims that he proved to them that his father worked for the VA, once upon a time. Again, great! And so what? He claims that they treat him, “like family.” Ok, Thomas, if you say so. 

Again, one more time: so what? What does that have to do with anything? You see his confusion? His mis-assessment of factors? Schoenberger thinks that establishing rapport with somebody answering a phone on a Sunday in a government office gives him a lever. He is a dilettante. 

G. Schoenberger tries to intimidate me, another measure of his stupidity. I am a survivor of brutal close-range confrontations where enemies tried to kill me. Tried. I am grateful that they failed.

But those moments and my memories of them eclipse anything that Rotund Thomas Schoenberger can imagine. Indeed, those experiences profoundly divide us, a truth that he dimly senses, and it drives him insane with envy. 

I do not even have to say this: I am a decorated airborne Ranger, a former Green Beret, a former Snowcap advisor. I was the guest of a president. Thomas Schoenberger is a convicted felon, we documented him in the act of committing yet more felonies, and he is in our legal kill zone. 

Elizabeth Vering, Schoenberger sock and discarded woman, thinks that I am arrogant. I am beyond her understanding.
Never forget that craven Thomas Schoenberger steals valor. He claims honors that are not his to claim, he spins fantasies, he claims that he was a Remote Viewer, and he concocted a tale about a retired CIA bureaucrat that merely illustrates how pathetic and misinformed that he is. 
Schoenberger and the former official met because Schoenberger was attempting to sell Mozart memorabilia rejected by museums.

A con-man at his work, seducing a lady, until he can put the touch on her for a "loan."

Bruce Cooper Clarke, Jr. was an arms control expert, a disarmament specialist, an analyst by training, not a case officer, not a paramilitary operations officer. Clarke was not trained in HUMINT, he had no expertise in that discipline, he never ran an agent. 
Clarke was not affiliated with the Technical Services Division, he was not a technician, nor a communications specialist, nor a code breaker nor a specialist in encryption. 
Clarke had nothing to do with Cicada 3301. At his death, he was 88 years old, and in failing health for many years. There is no evidence that he even knew how to turn on a computer. 
This is what happens when a con-man reads a couple of books, misunderstands them, then  spins fantasies. 
Schoenberger claims that the VA tells him that they are investigating me. That is outstanding. I hope that they are. This is yet one more attack vector for me to cite in my multiple criminal complaints against Thomas Schoenberger. 
If the VA is, indeed, investigating me (which I doubt), they will eventually be obliged to contact me. At that time, I will appraise them of my multiple filings against Thomas Schoenberger and I will put them in contact with a particular DOJ AUSA. Then they can do whatever justice decrees. That is all that I ever wanted: justice. 
Thomas Schoenberger ends his rancid rant against me with, “really sorry, Esteban, but you lose again.” 

Do I, Thomas? Do I lose again? 
Thank you for providing yet more evidence of your tortious interference, more felony counts amongst the many already documented and referred to the FBI and to a particular AUSA. 

For those who do not know, AUSA stands for Assistant US Attorney. They are the prosecutors that indict criminals for felonies. Thomas may learn the name of one soon. 
Schoenberger elsewhere says that I am “obsessed” with him. I beg to differ. I am angry. This is how it looks when an airborne Ranger, a veteran of combat, a former Green Beret, a former Snowcap advisor, this is how it looks when you piss one of us off. 
I keep clear in my mind those things that can affect narrative and popular perception, and those things that can result in criminal indictments, prosecutions, convictions, and sentencing. 

One set of factors influence social media perceptions. The other... the other set can put you in jail. 
Guess where I put the weight of my effort? 
Schoenberger claims that he plays chess against me, and that I lose. 
We shall see, when that inevitable knock comes upon his door, and Federal Marshals take him into custody. 
Schoenberger believes that that day will never come. 
We shall see. 

Stinky Steve Outtrim Lies, Distorts, Twists, Diverts, & Distracts
Comments from CoronaVirus Updates (Thomas Schoenberger), "Jackie veers off the reservation once again," YouTube , April 14, 2020. 
Stinky Steve Outtrim twists and distorts statements to pound round facts into square holes. In this case, infamous for its simplicity and blunt evidence, Outtrim is exposed in a lie. 



By now, Stinky Steve's claim that I "revealed" that I was assigned to the Presidio of San Francisco in 1986, long a bullet-point on my public biography posted on LinkedIn, is a cornerstone of his perplexing narrative in support of Thomas Schoenberger, con-man, grifter, beggar-man, thief. 

The Defense Language Institute (DLI) had a satellite unit stationed at the Letterman Army Hospital facility on the Presidio of San Francisco in 1986, I was assigned to Co. H, as I learned my birth language (Spanish-Latin American) like a foreigner. German and Korean was also taught there. Letterman was on the opposite side of the base from the other units, like the PSYOP unit to which Aquino was assigned. You could say that we were isolated--in the middle of one of the great cities of America. 
Stupid Steve pretends that he maneuvered and outwitted me into divulging that I was assigned to the Presidio in 1986. "Smart Steve," he claims! 
Except, no: he was not so smart. 
Why Stinky Steve would mob up with the Schoenberger Crew, why he would associate with convicted felons using antisemitic hate speech, committing defamation, putting himself and his fortune at risk, is impossible to understand. 

Stupid Steve Outtrim is wealthy, and renown for his bizarre synaptic leaps analyzing parapolitics. Why would Silly Steve risk it all? 


I ask this question all the time, and I remain mystified. 
What is simple to understand is that Stinky Steve hates me. He absolutely despises me. 
Why? Let me count the ways. 
1. I call him names--like "Stinky Steve," a reference to his infamy in the Aussie press for bad body odor, obesity, and poor dental hygiene: just google "Steve Outtrim body odor" for yourself and see. I should not call him names. It is not nice. Sometimes I am not nice. 


2. I speculate about the likelihood that Stupid Steve will be sued for defamation and antisemitic hate speech. He really gets triggered by the possibility that he will have to retain expensive law firms to defend against such a case, inevitably leading to a pricy settlement, I suspect mostly because Stingy Steve is secretly a tightwad and hates wasting money on lawyers. 
Stupid Steve hopes that I have seen no documents related to a hypothetical case against him. He does not know. But that does not deter him from accusing me of "spreading lies," or characterizing me as a "researcher" when I never refer to myself that way, nor of pulling a whopper with his link to Bangkok. "Lies," Silly Steve? Like the lies that I detail in this article? Are you sure? Why would I speculate about a hypothetical lawsuit like this with no foundation? Right. I would not. But let me be crystal clear with you: I am not here to "demonstrate" anything to you. You do not like lies? Guess what. I do not like them either. And that is why I wasted my time today writing this stupid article. Because your malfeasance and personal corruption demanded it of me. Your lies. You wanted "muh citations." Here they are. Do you have the integrity to post the correction on your blog? Of course not. You parse your way through life, and you fool many, but you do not fool me. 

So many other examples of Slimy Steve Outtrim's antisemitism can be shared here, but why should I expose them? Better for them to be detailed in a hypothetical lawsuit. The truth is that Stupid Steve lacks the nuance to detect the antisemitism in himself. He counts the number of Jews that he knows, that he has known, that he ever interacted with, thinking that this is proof that he is not an antisemite. Sorry, Sorry Steve. You are an antisemite, I exposed it in you during our DM exchange, the complete text of which you still fail to publish. It does not matter to me. I am not seeking to persuade public opinion of your antisemitism. It will be adjudicated in a court of law under the provisions of hate speech, by lawyers--if a case ever makes it that far. My suspicion is that you will be compelled to make a very expensive deal to prevent that. But these are mere hypotheses--at this point. Maybe you would like to revisit the decision-making that compelled you to send me that fatuous article? Accusing the Jews of Satanism is one of the oldest historical tropes of all time, which you would know if your awareness extended beyond The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.  

3. Stinky Steve considers me an apologist for Gabe Hoffman, financier and accused murderer of Crazy Isaac Kappy, whose death is still considered a suicide by authorities. I am cordial with Mr. Hoffman, but there is no financial relationship between us and we do not coordinate our activities.

Strictly speaking, we are not friends, nor associates, nor even colleagues. We know one another and we talk from time to time, as we share an antipathy to Stupid Steve Outtrim and Rotund Thomas Schoenberger. Suspicious Steve converts this into a conspiracy, because everything is a conspiracy for him. Everything.
I literally know none of the other personalities depicted on this despicable meme, which Slimy Steve retweets. I am not associated with Mossad, nor with CIA, nor with any of the financial titans shown here. I wish that I was. I live cautiously on a disability pension which Thomas Schoenberger is attempting to interfere with (and I hope that he does). Should Black Cube wish to put me on retainer I would be delighted. Contact info is at the left. Oh. Wait. Sawman and I had dinner one evening in 2004-5 in Bangkok. I exchanged emails with Arturo Tafoya and interviewed him in May, 2019. 

4. Stupid Steve considers me a Satanist--because Zionists are Satanic, I research Dr. John Dee, I expressed admiration for Dame Francis Yates, and--oh, yes--he claims that I call myself a "magician." That means that I am a "witch" and a "warlock," in Suspicious Steve's worldview. 

It is arguable that I can be labeled "Zionist," but anyone with the slightest sympathy for the state of Israel is suspect, and if Sloppy Steve knew that I served "alongside" Israeli special operators he would lose his shit. Sad Steve is not focused on precision here. 


In the example that I am addressing here, Simplistic Steve notes that the Satanic Ritual Abuse panic coincided in time and geography with my assignment to the Presidio, so he is not satisfied merely casting shade on me: I was there, "alongside" LTC Michael Aquino, I must surely be implicated. This is how un-sublime Simple Steve's thinking is. 


But Obtuse Outtrim goes even further. He claims that I knew LTC Michael Aquino, and that I knew the location of his cubicle and his duty status.
All false. I not only was not acquainted with LTC Michael Aquino, despite our contemporaneous assignment to the same military base in 1986, I did not know the location of his putative cubicle (if he even had one), nor was I conversant with his duty status (though it was certainly feasible to make assumptions). 
All false. I made no such statement. Here are my precise words: 

"I get connected to Aquino because we were both assigned to the Presidio in 1986? It was a military base! Aquino had a cubicle! He was a reservist!" 

That is all that I said. 


Stupid Steve twisted this statement into this:

"Thanks for revealing that you were at the Presidio in 1986 when the Satanic Ritual Abuse of children at the base day care center was happening & that you knew Michael Aquino so well that you knew the location of his cubicle and his duty status. Sure seems like a connection to me." 

All a fabrication, all a concoction, and all, as I said, Obtuse Outtrim pounding round facts into square holes, twisting and distorting my statements to support his preconceived notions and misinformed narrative. 
In the end, we see another co-conspirator in the Schoenberger Crew, Ridiculous Rebecca Morgan, retweeting me as I rebutted Stupid Steve. 


We see Gabe Hoffman suing Sad Zack McQuaid in Toronto. Will Rude Rebecca Morgan be next? 
Finally--the question that really matters: will Slimy Steve Outtrim be sued?

Magic 8-Ball says that it is probable.
Septic Steve hates it when his own methods are used against him. These are the exact sort of weird synaptic leaps that he should file a patent for on his burners.me website. 

Samizdat, "midnight vultures - boomerang," YouTube , April 18, 2020.

Stinky Steve Outtrim: LIAR
Comments from CoronaVirus Updates (Thomas Schoenberger), "Jackie veers off the reservation once again," YouTube , April 14, 2020. 
Stinky Steve Outtrim twists and distorts statements to pound round facts into square holes. In this case, infamous for its simplicity and blunt evidence, Outtrim is exposed in a lie. 


By now, Stinky Steve's claim that I "revealed" that I was assigned to the Presidio of San Francisco in 1986, long a bullet-point on my public biography posted on LinkedIn, is a cornerstone of his perplexing narrative in support of Thomas Schoenberger, con-man, grifter, beggar-man, thief. 

The Defense Language Institute (DLI) had a satellite unit stationed at the Letterman Army Hospital facility on the Presidio of San Francisco in 1986, I was assigned to Co. H, as I learned my birth language (Spanish-Latin American) like a foreigner. German and Korean was also taught there. Letterman was on the opposite side of the base from the other units, like the PSYOP unit to which Aquino was assigned. You could say that we were isolated--in the middle of one of the great cities of America. 
Stupid Steve pretends that he maneuvered and outwitted me into divulging that I was assigned to the Presidio in 1986. "Smart Steve," he claims! 
Except, no: he was not so smart. 
Why Stinky Steve would mob up with the Schoenberger Crew, why he would associate with convicted felons using antisemitic hate speech, committing defamation, putting himself and his fortune at risk, is impossible to understand. 

Stupid Steve Outtrim is wealthy, and renown for his bizarre synaptic leaps analyzing parapolitics. Why would Silly Steve risk it all? 


I ask this question all the time, and I remain mystified. 
What is simple to understand is that Stinky Steve hates me. He absolutely despises me. 
Why? Let me count the ways. 
1. I call him names--like "Stinky Steve," a reference to his infamy in the Aussie press for bad body odor, obesity, and poor dental hygiene: just google "Steve Outtrim body odor" for yourself and see. I should not call him names. It is not nice. Sometimes I am not nice. 


2. I speculate about the likelihood that Stupid Steve will be sued for defamation and antisemitic hate speech. He really gets triggered by the possibility that he will have to retain expensive law firms to defend against such a case, inevitably leading to a pricy settlement, I suspect mostly because Stingy Steve is secretly a tightwad and hates wasting money on lawyers. 
Stupid Steve hopes that I have seen no documents related to a hypothetical case against him. He does not know. But that does not deter him from accusing me of "spreading lies," or characterizing me as a "researcher" when I never refer to myself that way, nor of pulling a whopper with his link to Bangkok. "Lies," Silly Steve? Like the lies that I detail in this article? Are you sure? Why would I speculate about a hypothetical lawsuit like this with no foundation? Right. I would not. But let me be crystal clear with you: I am not here to "demonstrate" anything to you. You do not like lies? Guess what. I do not like them either. And that is why I wasted my time today writing this stupid article. Because your malfeasance and personal corruption demanded it of me. Your lies. You wanted "muh citations." Here they are. Do you have the integrity to post the correction on your blog? Of course not. You parse your way through life, and you fool many, but you do not fool me. 

So many other examples of Slimy Steve Outtrim's antisemitism can be shared here, but why should I expose them? Better for them to be detailed in a hypothetical lawsuit. The truth is that Stupid Steve lacks the nuance to detect the antisemitism in himself. He counts the number of Jews that he knows, that he has known, that he ever interacted with, thinking that this is proof that he is not an antisemite. Sorry, Sorry Steve. You are an antisemite, I exposed it in you during our DM exchange, the complete text of which you still fail to publish. It does not matter to me. I am not seeking to persuade public opinion of your antisemitism. It will be adjudicated in a court of law under the provisions of hate speech, by lawyers--if a case ever makes it that far. My suspicion is that you will be compelled to make a very expensive deal to prevent that. But these are mere hypotheses--at this point. Maybe you would like to revisit the decision-making that compelled you to send me that fatuous article? Accusing the Jews of Satanism is one of the oldest historical tropes of all time, which you would know if your awareness extended beyond The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.  

3. Stinky Steve considers me an apologist for Gabe Hoffman, financier and accused murderer of Crazy Isaac Kappy, whose death is still considered a suicide by authorities. I am cordial with Mr. Hoffman, but there is no financial relationship between us and we do not coordinate our activities.

Strictly speaking, we are not friends, nor associates, nor even colleagues. We know one another and we talk from time to time, as we share an antipathy to Stupid Steve Outtrim and Rotund Thomas Schoenberger. Suspicious Steve converts this into a conspiracy, because everything is a conspiracy for him. Everything.
I literally know none of the other personalities depicted on this despicable meme, which Slimy Steve retweets. I am not associated with Mossad, nor with CIA, nor with any of the financial titans shown here. I wish that I was. I live cautiously on a disability pension which Thomas Schoenberger is attempting to interfere with (and I hope that he does). Should Black Cube wish to put me on retainer I would be delighted. Contact info is at the left. Oh. Wait. Sawman and I had dinner one evening in 2004-5 in Bangkok. I exchanged emails with Arturo Tafoya and interviewed him in May, 2019. 

4. Stupid Steve considers me a Satanist--because Zionists are Satanic, I research Dr. John Dee, I expressed admiration for Dame Francis Yates, and--oh, yes--he claims that I call myself a "magician." That means that I am a "witch" and a "warlock," in Suspicious Steve's worldview. 

It is arguable that I can be labeled "Zionist," but anyone with the slightest sympathy for the state of Israel is suspect, and if Sloppy Steve knew that I served "alongside" Israeli special operators he would lose his shit. Sad Steve is not focused on precision here. 


In the example that I am addressing here, Simplistic Steve notes that the Satanic Ritual Abuse panic coincided in time and geography with my assignment to the Presidio, so he is not satisfied merely casting shade on me: I was there, "alongside" LTC Michael Aquino, I must surely be implicated. This is how un-sublime Simple Steve's thinking is. 


But Obtuse Outtrim goes even further. He claims that I knew LTC Michael Aquino, and that I knew the location of his cubicle and his duty status.
All false. I not only was not acquainted with LTC Michael Aquino, despite our contemporaneous assignment to the same military base in 1986, I did not know the location of his putative cubicle (if he even had one), nor was I conversant with his duty status (though it was certainly feasible to make assumptions). 
All false. I made no such statement. Here are my precise words: 

"I get connected to Aquino because we were both assigned to the Presidio in 1986? It was a military base! Aquino had a cubicle! He was a reservist!" 

That is all that I said. 


Stupid Steve twisted this statement into this:

"Thanks for revealing that you were at the Presidio in 1986 when the Satanic Ritual Abuse of children at the base day care center was happening & that you knew Michael Aquino so well that you knew the location of his cubicle and his duty status. Sure seems like a connection to me." 

All a fabrication, all a concoction, and all, as I said, Obtuse Outtrim pounding round facts into square holes, twisting and distorting my statements to support his preconceived notions and misinformed narrative. 
In the end, we see another co-conspirator in the Schoenberger Crew, Ridiculous Rebecca Morgan, retweeting me as I rebutted Stupid Steve. 


We see Gabe Hoffman suing Sad Zack McQuaid in Toronto. Will Rude Rebecca Morgan be next? 
Finally--the question that really matters: will Slimy Steve Outtrim be sued?

Magic 8-Ball says that it is probable.
Septic Steve hates it when his own methods are used against him. These are the exact sort of weird synaptic leaps that he should file a patent for on his burners.me website. 

Samizdat, "midnight vultures - boomerang," YouTube , April 18, 2020.

I wrote to Ms. Jacqueline Weaver after watching Steve Outtrim’s livestream which he claimed was a response to her article, “The Elliptical Universe of the Cryptobeast and the Grand Master of the Order of the One Star Monktel,” published on her Tracking the Leopard Meroz website.


In his livestream, Outtrim never, not once, mentions that Thomas Schoenberger is evading legal service. He alibis for Zach McQuaid, never acknowledging that McQuaid attempted to evade legal service himself, in imitation of his puppet master, and was only foiled because Canada is not California.


In email to Weaver, Schoenberger claims that Gabe Hoffman is "impersonating a lawyer," sending McQuaid fake lawsuits in an attempt to bully him. A fundamental error. Hoffman sued McQuaid for real. When McQuaid obeyed Schoenberger’s corrupt guidance to just ignore electronic service--the email delivery of court documents--he waltzed himself into a real mess, because his continued antisemitic smears against Hoffman put him in contempt of court, and worse, he used hate speech when he did it.
See: Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Statement of Claim, Gabriel Alan Hoffman and Zachary McQuaid, December 19, 2019. 

I am not aware that McQuaid has retained legal representation. I am not an enemy of McQuaid. In the final analysis, I may end up being his only friend, because I appear to be the only observer of these affairs repeatedly advising him to retain legal counsel. McQuaid is sued in meatspace. His own antisemitic smears made that happen. He had best respond in meatspace. He can certainly end up sanctioned in meatspace.


Outtrim asks why he should hire an attorney for McQuaid? There is a good reason why.


But I want to talk first about Outtrim’s lack of respect for legal processes and his bizarre interpretations. Antisemitism aside, this is at the heart of my rejection of Outtrim. He rejects the law because it is not Christian enough for him, he says, when that is just a synonym for doing things his way, not the way that our laws dictate.
These are excerpts from Steve Outtrim's comments to Jackie Weaver's article "Gabe Hoffman vs. Zachary McQuaid aka Zack Quaid," Tracking the Leopard Meroz , February 7, 2020. 

Our laws doxxed McQuaid, he says, Weaver doxxed McQuaid, Hoffman doxxed McQuaid. Everyone doxxed McQuaid. I terrorize McQuaid. None of this is McQuaid’s fault. McQuaid is never blamed for making antisemitic smears. He is the victim. Outtrim could file a patent for weird leaps of logic. Indeed, Outtrim condemns me because I refuse to answer his questions, or provide “evidence” on his terms, which he gleefully declares makes me “ad hominem,” as Outtrim declares a monopoly for himself on all “evidence.”


It is an American tradition to sympathize with outlaws, we love our Bonnies and Clydes. I always wanted to be an Indian when playing Cowboys and Indians. But not in this case. These outlaws are antisemites. “Evidence?” Read the Statement of Claim. Outtrim can deny antisemitism, yet his own words and actions belie his denials, and it is this, I think, that is actually at the foundation of Outtrim’s support for Schoenberger and McQuaid. Antisemitism is the common denominator.


(Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Statement of Claim, Gabriel Alan Hoffman & Zachary McQuaid, Schedule "A," December 19, 2019, p. 7).


I wrote about this earlier, as Outtrim’s behavior makes no sense. A multimillionaire asking “why?” he should subsidize McQuaid’s legal defense, when he abuses McQuaid as an asymmetrical ideological weapon in his disputes with Weaver, Hoffman and I. Outtrim somehow feels entitled to abuse McQuaid, especially when it is Michael Levine paying for the antisemitic smears, not him.


(Esteban Trujillo de Gutierrez, "An Appeal to Steve Outtrim," Magic Kingdom Dispatch , February 24, 2020).  
Outtrim claims that his problem with Ms. Weaver is doxxing. He claims that Ms. Weaver doxxed McQuaid, when the Ontario Superior Court of Justice doxxed McQuaid. It was McQuaid’s antisemitic smears of a litigious financier that got him sued in the first place. McQuaid’s ongoing failure to retain a lawyer will expose his address all over again, as he is now in contempt of court. Hoffman will surely accuse him of hate speech, and more legal documents will surely be issued—and Jacqueline Weaver will perform a public service when she publishes them. Unredacted.
Outtrim’s sympathy for McQuaid is the true act of impersonation: he is really using McQuaid to cast doxxing shade on Weaver and on Hoffman, he tries to make this “Christians v. Satanists & Zionists,” and he desperately wants to implicate me in SRA, child molestation and worse at the Presidio in 1986. My refusal to regurgitate an alibi for him on command makes me guilty, and he claims that I am a “magician” who summons Enochian demons, because I research the Renaissance, Dr. John Dee, and admire Dame Frances Yates.


Does Outtrim cross the line to co-conspiracy and accessory to evading legal service through his willful blindness and diversions? It seems that Outtrim knows where the line of criminality stands, and he deftly avoids committing unambiguous crimes. But he flirts with the margins. There is no question that Outtrim is a partisan co-conspirator. 
I said before that evading legal service is a tactic. It can be used on a limited basis to gain time. When it is elevated to a strategy, the offender denies the legitimacy of our legal system, making it a shitty strategy, as it can only succeed for a finite period of time. Ultimately, the absconder will be served. 
Denying the legitimacy of our legal system is a losing strategy. Our legal systems are imperfect, and they are administered by humans, but we prefer them to street justice, though street justice would be infinitely more satisfying. Ask Mr. Valerin, who claims that I warred with the contras.


Finally, Outtrim proclaims “there is no warrant” out for Schoenberger’s arrest, like that matters. More diversion. We are dealing here with civil lawsuits, and these are no less vital than felonies for their protagonists. Indeed, they convert to felonies when contempt of court ensues, and I think that this may end up getting Schoenberger’s probation revoked, obstruction, remanding him back into custody. His clock is ticking.
Schoenberger is breaking the law, violating probation, cyberstalking and cyber bullying, calling Ms. Weaver and I “CIA assets,” in violation of Title 50, Protection of Identities. Ms. Weaver and I are not “CIA assets,” the proposition that she has a “Mockingbird” pedigree is ludicrous, and not all retired Green Berets work for CIA. But Schoenberger does not know that. He intends to expose us as intelligence officers. 



All that I can say is, Schoenberger is fortunate that I am not a CIA officer, because then he would quickly be a grease stain. Alas, I have to file complaints with federal agents just like any other citizen, which inconvenience Schoenberger will not be able to abuse for much longer.


I told Mr. Outtrim earlier to be careful with his associations, as he is mobbed up with felons committing ongoing felonies, and Mr. Hoffman has a track record of suing antisemites on contact. 
I no longer warn Mr. Outtrim. I want him to continue abusing Zack McQuaid as an ideological weapon. I want Mr. Outtrim to continue inferring that I am implicated in SRA, and worse. I want Outtrim to keep calling me an advocate of “left-hand path” practices, a “magician,” a “witch,” a “warlock,” and more. 

Keep talking, Mr. Outtrim.

An Appeal to Steve Outtrim
I wrote the following as a response to the YouTube videographer known as Monkey Savant in a comment thread on my YouTube channel Samizdat YouTube .



Samizdat (Monkey Savant Mirror), "Monkey Savant Responds to Thomas's 2nd Doxxing Attempt Failure Feb 16, 2020," YouTube , February 23, 2020.

"Any dog is a far higher order of being than these conspiratorial nimrods. I much prefer the company of dogs and cats to that of humans, in any case. 
I am mystified by Outtrim. He is worth tens of millions of $AUS and yet he is in the gutter with a convicted felon stalker who absconds from legal service. It just makes no sense. 
(Steve Outtrim: Wikipedia, and his website, burners.me. The reference is to Thomas Schoenberger, whose criminal history is addressed in articles on my website Samizdat: see Cicada Files: Z 3301, et al , for example. Schoenberger is absconding from legal service, fleeing in effect, delaying justice by hiding. Outtrim is an egregious partisan endorsing Schoenberger's misconduct). 
Uh, no. I just had a conversation with an FBI Supervisory Special Agent and she confirmed that reporting felonies in progress cannot under any circumstances be mischaracterized as "gangstalking." In fact, I invite your "law enforcement" to contact me to address your claims of "aggravated stalking" and your threat to get me "charged in absentia." I look forward to hearing from them. 

Outtrim contorts himself to defend the indefensible, he is beyond partisan, and he straight up lies, calling me a "witch" and a "warlock," claiming that I "admit" to "sorcery," casting personal medical information that I shared with other combat veterans in the most negative possible light. He is shameless. 
(This refers to Outtrim's "gotchas" as he distorts statements made by me in various places and spins them to my detriment, again in comments, this time to an article by Jacqueline Weaver, "Gabe Hoffman vs. Zachary McQuaid aka Zack Quaid," Tracking the Leopard Meroz , February 7, 2020). 
And it makes no sense. 
The stupid is epic in this screenshot from an article on Outtrim's blog. He will never live this down. 

Outtrim is angry at me because I did him the favor of advising him that he is flirting with a lawsuit. I did not tell him that he is sued, because he is not yet sued. But I did say that he is liable to get sued, as he is implicated with his current confederates and involved in their inimical enterprises. 
First off, the link in the word "Bangkok" is to an article about an infamous sexpat neighborhood where someone opened a "museum" that claims that CIA officers hung out there. See what he did there? Next, I never self-described as a "researcher." That is Outtrim's word, he tags me with it, then he puts it in quotes, to mock me. His expression "statement of claim by a plaintiff to initiate a lawsuit" is how he refers to me advising him to watch his language with Gabe Hoffman, because Hoffman is litigious, capable and entirely willing to sue the shit out of scumbags like Outtrim who defame him, particularly in antisemitic terms. I do Outtrim a favor, but he considers it "lies."
And this is the truth. I did Outtrim a favor. I am not threatening him. I am advising him, and my advice is free, with no strings attached. 
Outtrim puts himself in a vulnerable position, and he gets mad at me for telling him so. He should consider that his legal position is shaky. If he steps just a little bit further and makes the wrong statements about the wrong person again, he is likely to find himself sued. 
I invite any law enforcement official investigating the death of Stone County Sheriff Sergeant Michael Stephen on July 19, 2019 to contact me. I have information for you. I have already referred this information to FBI. 

Outtrim can defame me all that he likes. I do not need to be liked or admired by him. I do not think that he can hurt my feelings, as I really do not care what he thinks about me. My reputation stands on its own merits, and I am pretty much impermeable to anything that anyone like him can do or say.
(I barely replied to Outtrim's smear on me on his blog, published as "A858 vs the Cat Ladies - Part 2 Spooky Steven and The Game," where "Spooky Steven" refers to me and he accuses me of sending him malware, consorting with notorious Satanist Michael Aquino, and writes "He claims to be a warlock/magician." 
These are not just lies, they are defamation, particularly when you understand that the terms "warlock" and "magician" in Outtrim's lexicon are Satanic, specifically in a context citing Michael Aquino. 

The malware was embedded by whomever sent him the email, my connection to it was no connection at all. Outtrim also claims that I commit the sin of linking to a person that I still never exchanged a word with (Glenn Herman of MAGACO) on KeyBase. 

Finally, Outtrim accuses me of being an "informant" for Gabe Hoffman. I sympathize with Mr. Hoffman, but I do not know him well enough for any court to consider him my associate, or even a friend. As for "informant?" I have zero tolerance for antisemitism. 
Finally, Outtrim illustrates his crushing personal ignorance by mischaracterizing Dr. John Dee's Monas Hieroglyphica as "Satanic," and he gets mad because I notice his antisemitism). 
Apparently Steve Outtrim considers tweets like this amusing. I do not get the joke. I am dear friends with an eminent artist whose father died in the Nazi prison camps, and I was privileged to serve with Israeli special operators. I have to wonder, in fact, whether this is an intentional dangle by Outtrim, as it strikes me as so egregious. But then--maybe he is just this stupid, and this antisemitic. 
I am not suing anybody, unless Outtrim gets so egregious that an enterprising Kiwi lawyer perceives that a defamation suit is a slam dunk and offers to take the case on contingency. 


I would collaborate with such a lawsuit and surrender all proceeds to charitably benefit New Zealand veterans of war. So if anyone knows a Kiwi lawyer who wants to make some easy money, send him my way. Outtrim already defamed me. It is easily proven. 
"Alongside?" You may come to regret that carefully chosen word, Mr. Outtrim. Maybe you were not quite careful enough. 

All that I ever did to Outtrim was give him advice and tell everyone to google his name to read articles in the Aussie press about his gross body odor and bad breath. I did not write those articles. I am sure that they are incorrect. Nobody can be that disgusting. But he made yet another bad decision, getting involved with a pathetic woman who whispered malign rumors about him to Aussie journalists. 


So, yes, I made some videos that mock Outtrim. I called him names. Especially after he tried to manipulate Ms. Denice Matteau, who never did anything to him. Another example of Outtrim getting mobbed up with scumbags, consorting with idiots. 

I do not think that Outtrim has defamed me to a terrible degree--yet. And I do not consider being called a "witch" an insult, in any case. I was born a Catholic and raised that way. Over years I learned my own blend of pantheism, and I found my own personal beliefs mirrored in Giordano Bruno and Shaivism. 


I only wrote an entire book about this. Revelation is free for download on Academia, ResearchGate, GoogleBooks, and elsewhere. Look to the left beneath my Welcome to this site. See all those links? Free book. You can buy it, as well, if you want to buy me a cup of coffee for writing it. 


I am trying to wake Steve Outtrim up. I am trying to help him. I should probably send him the rebuttal that I wrote about his article about me. He did commit to publish such rebuttals on his own site, after all. 
I cannot be held responsible for anyone googling "Steve Outtrim body odor." Be advised--laughter may ensue. 
Hmmm...."

“Stinky Steve Outtrim” should now be known as “Sick Steve Outtrim,” as he is literally encouraging a pliable and suggestible man-child to kill himself. 


Crazy, but true. 
All because Gabe Hoffman allegedly doxxed Zack McQuaid. But did he, really? 
No. He did not. 
In the Winter of 2019, passing into the New Year of 2020, Zack McQuaid made a series of virulent and defamatory videos about Gabe Hoffman that were infested with antisemitic content. I cannot link to them, as YouTube struck McQuaid's channel, and he apparently failed to post backups anywhere. I do have many of them archived, but I saved them for the benefit of law enforcement--not to help a videographer who fails to back up his work.


As a Jew, Hoffman was not amused. As a wealthy financier with lawyers on retainer, Hoffman was also not without options. So he sued the shit out of Zack McQuaid, a Canadian, using Canadian lawyers in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, demanding a million dollars in compensation and humiliating retractions. (Jacqueline Weaver, “Gabe Hoffman vs. Zachary McQuaid aka Zack Quaid,” Tracking the Leopard Meroz , February 7, 2020). 

McQuaid’s response? McQuaid is a 26 year old man-child, a former mental patient, and an apparent professional victim. McQuaid stuck his head in the sand and recited “la-la-la” and pretended that it was all not actually happening. A very irresponsible and ineffective reaction.


McQuaid listened to his Svengali, Thomas Schoenberger, who is infamous on Twitter and YouTube for successfully absconding and avoiding legal service for multiple legal cases from process servers, thwarting our system of justice, holding it, in a sense, in abeyance, delaying his inevitable appearance before a judge in a real court of law. Alas: Ontario Courts are not California courts, McQuaid was served electronically as well, and he foolishly believed that he could imitate his controller, Schoenberger, and that he could avoid service and hence suspend the legal process. 
There is a reason why some survive and some do not. Darwin is not a theory, not really. Darwinian self-selection is a confirmable law of nature which anyone can observe in action, especially in a case such as this. Through his serial bad decisions, imitating Schoenberger, and pretending that he could wish his lawsuit into nonexistence, McQuaid literally self-selected himself to suffer a grievous doom. 
Is it an exaggeration to state that Zack McQuaid is suggestible? Not at all. He is transparently weak and compliant, and he craves, above all, to be told what to do by someone else. In short, McQuaid is a biological meat puppet, just waiting for a Svengali puppet master to appear and instruct him. Because God forbid that McQuaid be responsible for himself, or make his own decisions. Heaven forfend! 

And this is absolutely the sort of programmable idiot that Thomas Schoenberger, human engineer extraordinaire, lives for. The last time that he had such a pliable victim was Sam Fullerton, alias Zelador Petroff, who believed the lies of Schoenberger that he was making videos and music for a nonexistent Cicada 3301 SONY movie. Fullerton ended up dead after he realized that there was no SONY movie, and he snapped, dying in a confrontation with Arkansas sheriffs deputies that also claimed the life of a cop. 
When Schoenberger encountered McQuaid, he lost no time. He instructed McQuaid to make antisemitic videos accusing Gabe Hoffman of unforgivable crimes, and McQuaid was pleased to do so, especially when Michael Levine, the alleged “best friend” of Schoenberger, sent him whopping $63.77 dollar fees for making videos that were earmarked “Cicada,” for no reason that anyone understands. 






Let me review the situation for those who are perplexed: 
Schoenberger hates Hoffman, and he claims that Hoffman masterminded the murder of Isaac Kappy. Kappy’s death remains adjudicated a suicide. There are no indications that the case will be reopened. Schoenberger is a social engineer, a manipulator of the weak-minded, and fairly inept at it, but competent enough with someone as pliable as McQuaid. 
Schoenberger spots McQuaid one day on YouTube, and he tweets to McQuaid, “That is a hell of a video. Set up a PayPal account, people will donate. You are really talented!” Which of course McQuaid immediately does. The video was a criticism of Gabe Hoffman. (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Gabriel Alan Hoffman v. Zachary McQuaid , December 19, 2019, p. 11). 
And then Schoenberger directs his “best friend” Michael Levine, a wealthy and successful Hollywood composer who inexplicably funds a convicted felon and sociopath, to pay McQuaid for antisemitic and defamatory videos. Levine actually does so. 
For some reason, and I do not think that anybody understands why, McQuaid unburdened himself to Manuel Chavez III, an avowed enemy of Thomas Schoenberger, and a notorious net troll, and he actually shared receipts and emails sent to him by Levine and Schoenberger with Chavez. This was an incredibly self-destructive and foolish move. It defies logic. 
Chavez, being Chavez, immediately shared them with the world, and then everybody knew that Schoenberger was directing Levine to pay McQuaid to produce antisemitic hit videos targeting Hoffman. 
All clear? 
You cannot make up crazier shit. But it all actually happened. 
So at this point in time, February 18, 2020, McQuaid is still sued by Hoffman, and since McQuaid continued making defamatory hit videos about Hoffman in defiance of the order of the court, McQuaid is actually now in contempt of court, an inconvenient legal fact which Hoffman will surely exploit. (“An interim, interlocutory and permanent injunction” is in place, Hoffman v. McQuaid, p. 3). 
McQuaid still has not, as far as I am aware, hired a lawyer, or even sought a public defender at no cost to himself. In other words, McQuaid has apparently done nothing to address his predicament, aside from making whining videos and tweeting that he is weak and stupid and innocent and helpless and he is the victim of a predatory Gabe Hoffman, who merely wants anyone making antisemitic videos about him to cease. That is all that Hoffman actually wants. He has enough money. He does not need more, and no one is under any illusion that McQuaid has a pot to piss in, much less any money. But no one should tolerate utter racist lies about them to be distributed across social media. 
McQuaid apparently does not understand this simple fact. He is sued. He is enjoined by court order from continuing to defame Hoffman. As he is in contempt of court at this time, his legal predicament looks increasingly precarious. McQuaid appears to be a professional victim. The court case describes him as “of limited or no financial means and education…and a self-professed history of mental illness.” (Hoffman v. McQuaid, p. 9). Schoenberger elsewhere says that McQuaid was previously diagnosed with depression and PTSD. He is 26 years old. An artist. And helpless. And incredibly stupid. He is programmed by Thomas Schoenberger. 
So Jacqueline Weaver, a writer of some note, an incisive observer of social media, publishes legal documents posted by the court. These documents are public record, they are not redacted in any way, they are not sealed. Like all legal documents, they use real names, not pseudonyms, and real addresses in meatspace. Anyone who knows where to look for such documents can find them. 
This scares the hell out of Zack McQuaid, as he believes that the world is populated with murderers and rapists and now, because Jacqueline Weaver published the public legal documents about his case, they all know exactly where Zach McQuaid lives, and he is afraid that he will be raped and murdered. 
He is, in fact, “threatened for his life,” to quote a Thomas Schoenberger sock account, @sdsproat, on Twitter. 


This is, by the way, the same world that you and I live in. I think that we all accept that there are bad people in our world, there are, indeed, rapists, and murderers, and you just never know when they will strike. Is it possible that they will descend upon Zack McQuaid and rape and murder him? Sure. Just like it could happen to you, or to me, or to anyone else. 
But Zack blames Gabe Hoffman for his sudden vulnerability to the rapists and murderers of the world, because Gabe Hoffman sued him. McQuaid does not stop and realize, “well, I defamed this prominent Jewish financier with a track record of suing bastards,” and then proceed to the next idea that occurs naturally to you and I. No. Zack blames Hoffman for suing him, end of story. 
Hoffman is wrong in McQuaid’s mind for being litigious and Jewish and unwilling to tolerate McQuaid’s defamations. That is how Zack McQuaid’s thinking functions. That is the sort of worldview that he walks around with. 
Then McQuaid condemns Jacqueline Weaver, because she is a writer, and because she did not redact a legal document that is a public record. Somehow it is Ms. Weaver’s responsibility to ensure that Zack McQuaid’s true name and public address are not available to anyone. Jacqueline Weaver performed a public service making us aware of the specifics of this lawsuit, as Thomas Schoenberger is evading legal service from multiple other plaintiffs who are looking to nuke him in a court of law. She is not obligated to sanitize Zack McQuaid’s legal trail. But in McQuaid’s mind, she is, “this Jackie woman he has writing stuff for him.” I am aware of no financial relationship between Ms. Weaver and Mr. Hoffman. Mr. McQuaid should take care that he does not get sued by Jackie Weaver. 
Absurd, yes. 
So as I said, Zack McQuaid then responds by tweeting. Rather than hiring a lawyer, or retaining a public defender at no cost to himself, Zack McQuaid tweets. It goes without saying that McQuaid’s address would not appear in further legal documents posted by the court if he were represented by a competent attorney: instead, that attorney’s address would appear on legal documents. 
No matter. Instead of doing the logical, responsible thing, the ordained commonsensical thing to react to getting sued, McQuaid tweets. This is indicative of a childish man who lives more in cyberspace than in the real world. In fact, he tweets @TorontoPolice many times. There are no indications that they noticed the tweets, or even care about them. Running to Mommy is not a logical course of action in our world. Tweeting to a police department is not an effective course of action. 
But McQuaid is so fearful that the murderers and rapists of the world now know where he lives, he is so unnerved by this, that he claims that he is in fear for his very life. Yes. McQuaid goes there. He fears for his life. He tweets to all the murderers and rapists of the world that he is in fear for his life, and that his address in meatspace is now public record. And he blames Jacqueline Weaver and most of all, Gabe Hoffman. 
It is a short step from there for Schoenberger to assert that McQuaid is “suicidal.” 


The Twitter account Stephie @sdsproat is a known Thomas Schoenberger sock account, it is either Schoenberger himself masquerading as a mythical woman named Stephanie or it is a woman named Stephanie who so slavishly parrots Schoenberger’s thinking and words that she is indistinguishable from him. Through Stephanie, or as Stephanie, Schoenberger then claimed that Zack McQuad was suicidal over the theoretical threat to him from murderers and rapists that Gabe Hoffman allegedly pointed at his residence. 
This is the thing. If your friend is suicidal, what do you do? You reach out, you make sure that they are referred to competent psychiatric authority, if necessary, you notify the authorities and you explain that you are concerned for the welfare of your friend. What you do not do is tweet. 
When your friend is beset by irrational paranoias, you try to calm them down, you speak rationally and logically to them, you explain to them that their phobias are irrational. You gently take the bong out of their hands and recommend that they give the ganja a break for a bit. You explain to them that nobody is interested enough in them to come to their residence and rape and murder them. But above all, you do not simply tweet, and think that that is an effective course of action. 
That is irrational enough and irresponsible enough that it almost makes such horrible friends complicit in the bizarre worldview of the insane. And in fact, what actually happened is that the so-called “friends” of Zack McQuaid reinforced his phobias and paranoias, they pushed a suicide narrative, they continued defaming Mr. Hoffman, and they amplified horrible antisemitic lies about him. 




And that is where this whole situation stands. 
Enter Sick Steve Outtrim, formerly known as Stinky Steve Outtrim. On Jacqueline Weaver’s blog, in the comments to her article, “Gabe Hoffman vs. Zachary McQuaid aka Zack Quaid,” on Tracking the Leopard Meroz (February 7, 2020), Mr. Outtrim wrote:

“The young man being sued has stated on Twitter today that he is afraid for his life after being doxxed from this blog.” 

Mr. Outtrim accepts that it is not Jacqueline Weaver’s obligation to redact legal documents, so he throws the Christian card like crazy: 

“Do the Courts always incorporate Christian values? Or sometimes should mercy and humanity play a part in decisions of judgement?”

Ms. Weaver is not playing, she lacks all patience, and she will not permit her blog to be abused by trolls, even wealthy trolls with blogs of their own like Sick Steve Outtrim who is enabling and amplifying the absurd rapist and murderer suicide thesis of Zack McQuaid. 

“The defendant decided not to defend himself in court, although most certainly someone like yourself could have hired him an attorney. Thus, by choosing to default, rather than standing up for his public statements, I have decided to leave the complaint “as is.” The defendant is a full adult and responsible for his words and his actions. I attempted to warn him of the manipulations and lies of Thomas Schoenberger. Have you done that, or are you encouraging the defendant to manipulate others by exhibiting an unmanly whining?” 

Well, we know precisely what Sick Steve Outtrim is doing: he is encouraging efforts to manipulate others with unmanly whining. Ms. Weaver is old school: men need to be men, and men need to handle their affairs with dignity. Ms. Weaver is in her 60’s, she is rich in experience and wisdom, and Zack McQuaid, in fact, Stinky Steve Outtrim, even Thomas Schoenberger, could learn much from her if they simply paid attention. 
Zack McQuaid is manifestly incapable of doing this. Jacqueline Weaver is attempting to help him—she is attempting to teach him to stand up and take responsibility for his own actions. 
Then I stepped in with my comment, which anyone can read, as Jacqueline Weaver kindly permitted it to be posted on her blog. In sum, I said: 

“Outtrim, in attacking Ms. Weaver on her own blog, is manipulating McQuaid’s feigned helplessness and using it as a weapon just like another partisan participant in this absurd debacle.” 

Well. Sick Steve could not stand for that. Plus, I mentioned that I outed him as an antisemite, and that makes Sick Steve angry, indeed. He posts a scorecard, a patented Outtrim maneuver, listing “Close Jewish friends of mine: 4,” and “Rabbis giving a blessing at my wedding: 1.” 
Stinky Sick Steve Outtrim is angry at me, he is absolutely incensed by me, and it does not help that I call him names and mock him unmercifully. I used to be quite a fan of his work, until he illustrated his absurd leaps of logic and bizarre theorizing in slavish support of the malign agendas of Thomas Schoenberger. Stinky Steve claims that I am a colleague of Michael Aquino’s, simply because we both were assigned to the same military base in 1986. That is the degree of precision that we can expect from lurid, ludicrous Sick Steve. 
Stinky Sick Steve summed me up like this:

“If he dies, oh well, he deserved it, because he slandered a rich guy.” Is that who you want to be?”

Then he claims that McQuaid is somehow being judged and found guilty by public opinion, “before even getting the chance to mount a defense.” 
Uh, no. McQuaid was sued long ago, so long ago that he had a full 30 days prior to February 5, 2020, which was the date upon which he was technically in default to the court and in contempt of a court order to cease defaming Gabe Hoffman. McQuaid had a chance to legally respond. He chose not to. 
Sick Stinky Steve also claims that I am “stalking someone to suicide.” That is pretty bold, Mr. Outtrim. I will remember that. In fact, I will make a note of that. Could be useful at some future point. And no: I do not appreciate it. 
So I replied, again on Jacqueline Weaver’s blog. 

“You corrupt, deluded, partisan jackass. “Suicide” is Zack’s word, he claims that he is not suicidal, which I am happy to hear, while you and your co-conspirators throw the term around and encourage suicidal ideation in a weak-minded minion with a psychiatric history of institutionalization. You seem to desperately hope that Zack does kill himself, as that would be ultimate ammunition in your psy-war against Gabe Hoffman. “Pathetic” does not begin to describe you.” 

Meanwhile, the pitiable Zack McQuaid made another ineffectual video that racked up 59 views (7 Likes, 14 Dislikes) from his 28 subscribers as of February 17, 2020. I wonder when Zack will get the message that tweeting and making videos is not an effective course of action in the real world.
Some people just cannot learn. 


Zack Quaid (Zack McQuaid), “The Isaac Kappy case meets Canadian Law -(QUAID),” YouTube , February 17, 2020. 

“Stinky Steve Outtrim” should now be known as “Sick Steve Outtrim,” as he is literally encouraging a pliable and suggestible man-child to kill himself. 


Crazy, but true. 
All because Gabe Hoffman allegedly doxxed Zack McQuaid. But did he, really? 
No. He did not. 
In the Winter of 2019, passing into the New Year of 2020, Zack McQuaid made a series of virulent and defamatory videos about Gabe Hoffman that were infested with antisemitic content. I cannot link to them, as YouTube struck McQuaid's channel, and he apparently failed to post backups anywhere. I do have many of them archived, but I saved them for the benefit of law enforcement--not to help a videographer who fails to back up his work.


As a Jew, Hoffman was not amused. As a wealthy financier with lawyers on retainer, Hoffman was also not without options. So he sued the shit out of Zack McQuaid, a Canadian, using Canadian lawyers in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, demanding a million dollars in compensation and humiliating retractions. (Jacqueline Weaver, “Gabe Hoffman vs. Zachary McQuaid aka Zack Quaid,” Tracking the Leopard Meroz , February 7, 2020). 

McQuaid’s response? McQuaid is a 26 year old man-child, a former mental patient, and an apparent professional victim. McQuaid stuck his head in the sand and recited “la-la-la” and pretended that it was all not actually happening. A very irresponsible and ineffective reaction.


McQuaid listened to his Svengali, Thomas Schoenberger, who is infamous on Twitter and YouTube for successfully absconding and avoiding legal service for multiple legal cases from process servers, thwarting our system of justice, holding it, in a sense, in abeyance, delaying his inevitable appearance before a judge in a real court of law. Alas: Ontario Courts are not California courts, McQuaid was served electronically as well, and he foolishly believed that he could imitate his controller, Schoenberger, and that he could avoid service and hence suspend the legal process. 
There is a reason why some survive and some do not. Darwin is not a theory, not really. Darwinian self-selection is a confirmable law of nature which anyone can observe in action, especially in a case such as this. Through his serial bad decisions, imitating Schoenberger, and pretending that he could wish his lawsuit into nonexistence, McQuaid literally self-selected himself to suffer a grievous doom. 
Is it an exaggeration to state that Zack McQuaid is suggestible? Not at all. He is transparently weak and compliant, and he craves, above all, to be told what to do by someone else. In short, McQuaid is a biological meat puppet, just waiting for a Svengali puppet master to appear and instruct him. Because God forbid that McQuaid be responsible for himself, or make his own decisions. Heaven forfend! 

And this is absolutely the sort of programmable idiot that Thomas Schoenberger, human engineer extraordinaire, lives for. The last time that he had such a pliable victim was Sam Fullerton, alias Zelador Petroff, who believed the lies of Schoenberger that he was making videos and music for a nonexistent Cicada 3301 SONY movie. Fullerton ended up dead after he realized that there was no SONY movie, and he snapped, dying in a confrontation with Arkansas sheriffs deputies that also claimed the life of a cop. 
When Schoenberger encountered McQuaid, he lost no time. He instructed McQuaid to make antisemitic videos accusing Gabe Hoffman of unforgivable crimes, and McQuaid was pleased to do so, especially when Michael Levine, the alleged “best friend” of Schoenberger, sent him whopping $63.77 dollar fees for making videos that were earmarked “Cicada,” for no reason that anyone understands. 






Let me review the situation for those who are perplexed: 
Schoenberger hates Hoffman, and he claims that Hoffman masterminded the murder of Isaac Kappy. Kappy’s death remains adjudicated a suicide. There are no indications that the case will be reopened. Schoenberger is a social engineer, a manipulator of the weak-minded, and fairly inept at it, but competent enough with someone as pliable as McQuaid. 
Schoenberger spots McQuaid one day on YouTube, and he tweets to McQuaid, “That is a hell of a video. Set up a PayPal account, people will donate. You are really talented!” Which of course McQuaid immediately does. The video was a criticism of Gabe Hoffman. (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Gabriel Alan Hoffman v. Zachary McQuaid , December 19, 2019, p. 11). 
And then Schoenberger directs his “best friend” Michael Levine, a wealthy and successful Hollywood composer who inexplicably funds a convicted felon and sociopath, to pay McQuaid for antisemitic and defamatory videos. Levine actually does so. 
For some reason, and I do not think that anybody understands why, McQuaid unburdened himself to Manuel Chavez III, an avowed enemy of Thomas Schoenberger, and a notorious net troll, and he actually shared receipts and emails sent to him by Levine and Schoenberger with Chavez. This was an incredibly self-destructive and foolish move. It defies logic. 
Chavez, being Chavez, immediately shared them with the world, and then everybody knew that Schoenberger was directing Levine to pay McQuaid to produce antisemitic hit videos targeting Hoffman. 
All clear? 
You cannot make up crazier shit. But it all actually happened. 
So at this point in time, February 18, 2020, McQuaid is still sued by Hoffman, and since McQuaid continued making defamatory hit videos about Hoffman in defiance of the order of the court, McQuaid is actually now in contempt of court, an inconvenient legal fact which Hoffman will surely exploit. (“An interim, interlocutory and permanent injunction” is in place, Hoffman v. McQuaid, p. 3). 
McQuaid still has not, as far as I am aware, hired a lawyer, or even sought a public defender at no cost to himself. In other words, McQuaid has apparently done nothing to address his predicament, aside from making whining videos and tweeting that he is weak and stupid and innocent and helpless and he is the victim of a predatory Gabe Hoffman, who merely wants anyone making antisemitic videos about him to cease. That is all that Hoffman actually wants. He has enough money. He does not need more, and no one is under any illusion that McQuaid has a pot to piss in, much less any money. But no one should tolerate utter racist lies about them to be distributed across social media. 
McQuaid apparently does not understand this simple fact. He is sued. He is enjoined by court order from continuing to defame Hoffman. As he is in contempt of court at this time, his legal predicament looks increasingly precarious. McQuaid appears to be a professional victim. The court case describes him as “of limited or no financial means and education…and a self-professed history of mental illness.” (Hoffman v. McQuaid, p. 9). Schoenberger elsewhere says that McQuaid was previously diagnosed with depression and PTSD. He is 26 years old. An artist. And helpless. And incredibly stupid. He is programmed by Thomas Schoenberger. 
So Jacqueline Weaver, a writer of some note, an incisive observer of social media, publishes legal documents posted by the court. These documents are public record, they are not redacted in any way, they are not sealed. Like all legal documents, they use real names, not pseudonyms, and real addresses in meatspace. Anyone who knows where to look for such documents can find them. 
This scares the hell out of Zack McQuaid, as he believes that the world is populated with murderers and rapists and now, because Jacqueline Weaver published the public legal documents about his case, they all know exactly where Zach McQuaid lives, and he is afraid that he will be raped and murdered. 
He is, in fact, “threatened for his life,” to quote a Thomas Schoenberger sock account, @sdsproat, on Twitter. 


This is, by the way, the same world that you and I live in. I think that we all accept that there are bad people in our world, there are, indeed, rapists, and murderers, and you just never know when they will strike. Is it possible that they will descend upon Zack McQuaid and rape and murder him? Sure. Just like it could happen to you, or to me, or to anyone else. 
But Zack blames Gabe Hoffman for his sudden vulnerability to the rapists and murderers of the world, because Gabe Hoffman sued him. McQuaid does not stop and realize, “well, I defamed this prominent Jewish financier with a track record of suing bastards,” and then proceed to the next idea that occurs naturally to you and I. No. Zack blames Hoffman for suing him, end of story. 
Hoffman is wrong in McQuaid’s mind for being litigious and Jewish and unwilling to tolerate McQuaid’s defamations. That is how Zack McQuaid’s thinking functions. That is the sort of worldview that he walks around with. 
Then McQuaid condemns Jacqueline Weaver, because she is a writer, and because she did not redact a legal document that is a public record. Somehow it is Ms. Weaver’s responsibility to ensure that Zack McQuaid’s true name and public address are not available to anyone. Jacqueline Weaver performed a public service making us aware of the specifics of this lawsuit, as Thomas Schoenberger is evading legal service from multiple other plaintiffs who are looking to nuke him in a court of law. She is not obligated to sanitize Zack McQuaid’s legal trail. But in McQuaid’s mind, she is, “this Jackie woman he has writing stuff for him.” I am aware of no financial relationship between Ms. Weaver and Mr. Hoffman. Mr. McQuaid should take care that he does not get sued by Jackie Weaver. 
Absurd, yes. 
So as I said, Zack McQuaid then responds by tweeting. Rather than hiring a lawyer, or retaining a public defender at no cost to himself, Zack McQuaid tweets. It goes without saying that McQuaid’s address would not appear in further legal documents posted by the court if he were represented by a competent attorney: instead, that attorney’s address would appear on legal documents. 
No matter. Instead of doing the logical, responsible thing, the ordained commonsensical thing to react to getting sued, McQuaid tweets. This is indicative of a childish man who lives more in cyberspace than in the real world. In fact, he tweets @TorontoPolice many times. There are no indications that they noticed the tweets, or even care about them. Running to Mommy is not a logical course of action in our world. Tweeting to a police department is not an effective course of action. 
But McQuaid is so fearful that the murderers and rapists of the world now know where he lives, he is so unnerved by this, that he claims that he is in fear for his very life. Yes. McQuaid goes there. He fears for his life. He tweets to all the murderers and rapists of the world that he is in fear for his life, and that his address in meatspace is now public record. And he blames Jacqueline Weaver and most of all, Gabe Hoffman. 
It is a short step from there for Schoenberger to assert that McQuaid is “suicidal.” 


The Twitter account Stephie @sdsproat is a known Thomas Schoenberger sock account, it is either Schoenberger himself masquerading as a mythical woman named Stephanie or it is a woman named Stephanie who so slavishly parrots Schoenberger’s thinking and words that she is indistinguishable from him. Through Stephanie, or as Stephanie, Schoenberger then claimed that Zack McQuad was suicidal over the theoretical threat to him from murderers and rapists that Gabe Hoffman allegedly pointed at his residence. 
This is the thing. If your friend is suicidal, what do you do? You reach out, you make sure that they are referred to competent psychiatric authority, if necessary, you notify the authorities and you explain that you are concerned for the welfare of your friend. What you do not do is tweet. 
When your friend is beset by irrational paranoias, you try to calm them down, you speak rationally and logically to them, you explain to them that their phobias are irrational. You gently take the bong out of their hands and recommend that they give the ganja a break for a bit. You explain to them that nobody is interested enough in them to come to their residence and rape and murder them. But above all, you do not simply tweet, and think that that is an effective course of action. 
That is irrational enough and irresponsible enough that it almost makes such horrible friends complicit in the bizarre worldview of the insane. And in fact, what actually happened is that the so-called “friends” of Zack McQuaid reinforced his phobias and paranoias, they pushed a suicide narrative, they continued defaming Mr. Hoffman, and they amplified horrible antisemitic lies about him. 




And that is where this whole situation stands. 
Enter Sick Steve Outtrim, formerly known as Stinky Steve Outtrim. On Jacqueline Weaver’s blog, in the comments to her article, “Gabe Hoffman vs. Zachary McQuaid aka Zack Quaid,” on Tracking the Leopard Meroz (February 7, 2020), Mr. Outtrim wrote:

“The young man being sued has stated on Twitter today that he is afraid for his life after being doxxed from this blog.” 

Mr. Outtrim accepts that it is not Jacqueline Weaver’s obligation to redact legal documents, so he throws the Christian card like crazy: 

“Do the Courts always incorporate Christian values? Or sometimes should mercy and humanity play a part in decisions of judgement?”

Ms. Weaver is not playing, she lacks all patience, and she will not permit her blog to be abused by trolls, even wealthy trolls with blogs of their own like Sick Steve Outtrim who is enabling and amplifying the absurd rapist and murderer suicide thesis of Zack McQuaid. 

“The defendant decided not to defend himself in court, although most certainly someone like yourself could have hired him an attorney. Thus, by choosing to default, rather than standing up for his public statements, I have decided to leave the complaint “as is.” The defendant is a full adult and responsible for his words and his actions. I attempted to warn him of the manipulations and lies of Thomas Schoenberger. Have you done that, or are you encouraging the defendant to manipulate others by exhibiting an unmanly whining?” 

Well, we know precisely what Sick Steve Outtrim is doing: he is encouraging efforts to manipulate others with unmanly whining. Ms. Weaver is old school: men need to be men, and men need to handle their affairs with dignity. Ms. Weaver is in her 60’s, she is rich in experience and wisdom, and Zack McQuaid, in fact, Stinky Steve Outtrim, even Thomas Schoenberger, could learn much from her if they simply paid attention. 
Zack McQuaid is manifestly incapable of doing this. Jacqueline Weaver is attempting to help him—she is attempting to teach him to stand up and take responsibility for his own actions. 
Then I stepped in with my comment, which anyone can read, as Jacqueline Weaver kindly permitted it to be posted on her blog. In sum, I said: 

“Outtrim, in attacking Ms. Weaver on her own blog, is manipulating McQuaid’s feigned helplessness and using it as a weapon just like another partisan participant in this absurd debacle.” 

Well. Sick Steve could not stand for that. Plus, I mentioned that I outed him as an antisemite, and that makes Sick Steve angry, indeed. He posts a scorecard, a patented Outtrim maneuver, listing “Close Jewish friends of mine: 4,” and “Rabbis giving a blessing at my wedding: 1.” 
Stinky Sick Steve Outtrim is angry at me, he is absolutely incensed by me, and it does not help that I call him names and mock him unmercifully. I used to be quite a fan of his work, until he illustrated his absurd leaps of logic and bizarre theorizing in slavish support of the malign agendas of Thomas Schoenberger. Stinky Steve claims that I am a colleague of Michael Aquino’s, simply because we both were assigned to the same military base in 1986. That is the degree of precision that we can expect from lurid, ludicrous Sick Steve. 
Stinky Sick Steve summed me up like this:

“If he dies, oh well, he deserved it, because he slandered a rich guy.” Is that who you want to be?”

Then he claims that McQuaid is somehow being judged and found guilty by public opinion, “before even getting the chance to mount a defense.” 
Uh, no. McQuaid was sued long ago, so long ago that he had a full 30 days prior to February 5, 2020, which was the date upon which he was technically in default to the court and in contempt of a court order to cease defaming Gabe Hoffman. McQuaid had a chance to legally respond. He chose not to. 
Sick Stinky Steve also claims that I am “stalking someone to suicide.” That is pretty bold, Mr. Outtrim. I will remember that. In fact, I will make a note of that. Could be useful at some future point. And no: I do not appreciate it. 
So I replied, again on Jacqueline Weaver’s blog. 

“You corrupt, deluded, partisan jackass. “Suicide” is Zack’s word, he claims that he is not suicidal, which I am happy to hear, while you and your co-conspirators throw the term around and encourage suicidal ideation in a weak-minded minion with a psychiatric history of institutionalization. You seem to desperately hope that Zack does kill himself, as that would be ultimate ammunition in your psy-war against Gabe Hoffman. “Pathetic” does not begin to describe you.” 

Meanwhile, the pitiable Zack McQuaid made another ineffectual video that racked up 59 views (7 Likes, 14 Dislikes) from his 28 subscribers as of February 17, 2020. I wonder when Zack will get the message that tweeting and making videos is not an effective course of action in the real world.
Some people just cannot learn. 


Zack Quaid (Zack McQuaid), “The Isaac Kappy case meets Canadian Law -(QUAID),” YouTube , February 17, 2020. 

With a little help from a smart friend, I made a YouTube channel that hosts video versions of my Cicada 3301 articles. Activated January 9, 2020, it now (January 23) has 458 subscribers and more than 6,000 views. 
My interviews and articles about Cicada 3301 are interesting only to a select audience. While 3301 was considered the "web's greatest mystery," no one understood where it came from or what its actual purpose was. 
Until now. I interview the people behind the mystery, and no one, I think, ever imagined what a maelstrom that would ignite. 
The interviews and articles are on my site at Samizdat . 
Now the videos are on Samizdat YouTube .
More, much more, is on the way.  

I just updated The Cicada Files on Samizdat: www.therealsamizdat.com. 
Months of researching and writing went into the project--and bitter cyberwar. 
I open with a Prelude. 




The articles that follow were all published on January 9, 2020. 
I follow it with a definitive explanation of the Cicada Trademark and its present custodian, Mr. Marcus Wanners: Marcus Wanners & "Halfassed Journalism." (7,125 words). 
Then I segue into The Repugnant brotherBox . (4,361 words). 
I conclude with an opus: Z 3301 et al. (21,476 words). 




Interviews, August and September, 2019. 
These articles were preceded by my interviews with gHOST3301 and the former lead designer of Cicada 3301, Arturo Tafoya. Mr. Tafoya provided the graphics that I use to illustrate the series. He is an incredible designer, and responsible for the iconic visuals that made 3301 a cultural phenomenon. 
This interview broke ground as the first interview with an elder of the cypherpunk order, published September 2, 2019: gHOST3301 Interviewed . (17,466 words). 
The lead interview in the series was published on August 15, 2019:  Arturo Tafoyovsky Interviewed. (11,243 words). 




Work Ahead.
I am now finalizing the first interview that I ever conducted on the subject of Cicada 3301, an interview with the YouTube celebrity Manuel Chavez III. 
While the Chavez interview was the first, conducted on May 22, 2019, it is by far the largest, and likely to surmount 100,000 words when my research on its commentary is complete. 
When I finally finish the Chavez interview, I will interview other, more obscure elders of the order. 
I will conclude the work by massaging it all into a book length treatment, the first-ever analyzing the organization, functions and goals of a clandestine cyber order. 



What is the Point? 

I use the tools of political science to produce a work of history. 
As this works continues, I will give some thought to my YouTube channel, and upload videos that illustrate the series. 
I will archive all digital works on my PasteBin and on LBRY. 
I look forward to the maelstrom that this work will incite. 
Everything that I write is ultimately destined for oblivion. 
In the meantime, we shall reap the whirlwind. 
Estéban Trujillo de GutiérrezBangkokJanuary 9, 2020