David Hathaway
More books by David Hathaway…
“All of these states of “flux” in a polarity-aligned EM field could cause a parasitic flow of electrons in a nearby wire that is not connected physically (only electromagnetically) to the parent EM circuit. Something equivalent to a diode could then block the shifting electrons from moving backwards in the circuit when the EM force is fluxed to ratchet another batch of electrons down the wire. The diode acts like a one-way valve. That is how voltage transformers and radio devices work. Alternating current changes (fluxes) the magnetic field many times a second, propelling photons in waves across a gap that push electrons incrementally in waves down a wire in a physically separate parasitic circuit. Radio waves can only propagate and induce a feeble current in a distant wire (antenna) because of EM flux. Without the flux, they would not propagate. Radio waves are electromagnetic (EM) waves that are generated in an alternating polarity-switching back-and-forth AC fashion. They are coherent waves of photons;”
― EMP Hoax
― EMP Hoax
“air gap without the flux which creates a repeating series of EM waves moving through the atmosphere which push the electrons incrementally through the conductors in the receiving radio’s antenna and circuitry. Radio receivers also have diodes / rectifiers to make the alternating current directional in the receiver circuitry. This current-inducing EM flux has not been demonstrated in a nuclear EMP. A directional electrical force cannot be induced in wires from photons arriving from high-altitude (after a nuclear burst) without EM flux or something to inhibit backwards flow”
― EMP Hoax
― EMP Hoax
“Jeffrey Lewis, an honorable EMP critic that is despised and derided by name by such EMP advocates as Peter Pry has made excellent commentaries and done great research on the EMP “threat inflation industry” as he calls it. He wrote a piece on ForeignPolicy.com titled, “The EMPire Strikes Back” on May 23, 2013 that described the sensational doom-and-gloom falsely attributed to EMP. However, referencing that article in a blog post titled “More EMP Nonsense” on June 10, 2013, even Lewis concedes that EMPs are real, but overblown:”
― EMP Hoax
― EMP Hoax
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite David to Goodreads.

