Moritz Schlick
Born
Berlin, Germany
Died
June 22, 1936
![]() |
General Theory of Knowledge
3 editions
—
published
1974
—
|
|
![]() |
Space and Time in Contemporary Physics: An Introduction to the Theory of Relativity and Gravitation
by
72 editions
—
published
1917
—
|
|
![]() |
Forma e contenuto
|
|
![]() |
Problems of Ethics
by
17 editions
—
published
1930
—
|
|
![]() |
Moritz Schlick Philosophical Papers: Volume 1: (1909–1922) (Vienna Circle Collection, 11a)
by
2 editions
—
published
1978
—
|
|
![]() |
Naturphilosophie: Das Wesen von Naturgesetzen und die Erklärung des Lebens. Neubearbeitung.
by |
|
![]() |
Philosophische Logik
—
published
1986
|
|
![]() |
LE SENS DE LA VIE
|
|
![]() |
Filsafat Alam
—
published
2001
|
|
![]() |
Philosophical Papers: Volume II: (1925-1936): 002
by
2 editions
—
published
1979
—
|
|
“Philosophy is that activity by which the meaning of propositions is established or discovered; it is a question of what the propositions actually mean. The content, soul, and spirit of science naturally consist in what is ultimately meant by its sentences; the philosophical activity of rendering significant is thus the alpha and omega of all scientific knowledge.
[Moritz Schlick interpreting Ludwig Wittgenstein's position]”
―
[Moritz Schlick interpreting Ludwig Wittgenstein's position]”
―
“... we see in philosophy not a system of cognitions, but a system of acts; philosophy is that activity through which the meaning of statements is revealed or determined. By means of philosophy statements are explained, by means of science they are verified. The latter is con cerned with the truth of statements, the former with what they actually mean. The content, soul and spirit of science is lodged naturally in what in the last analysis its statements actually mean; the philo sophical activity of giving meaning is therefore the Alpha and Omega of all scientific knowledge. This was indeed correctly surmised when it was said that philosophy supplied both the foundation and the apex of the edifice of science. It was a mistake, however, to suppose that the foundation was made up of “philosophical” statements (the statements of theory of knowledge), and crowned by a dome of philosophical statements (called metaphysics).”
―
―