Sign in with Facebook
James N. Anderson’s Followers (23)
786 books
|
105 friends
361 books
|
132 friends
69 books
|
13 friends
256 books
|
22 friends
255 books
|
13 friends
James N. Anderson
Goodreads Author
Born
The United Kingdom
Website
Twitter
Member Since
December 2013
Of Rocks and Trees: Mattson in Defense of Gaffin and Van Til
Three decades ago, the Westminster Theological Journal published an article by Richard B. Gaffin, Jr., with the modest title, “Some Epistemological Reflections on 1 Cor 2:6–16.” Gaffin’s main purpose was to provide some direct exegetical argument to support “several key emphases” in the epistemology of Cornelius Van Til. (Read the first page of the article to get the fuller context.)
In my humble e
Read more of this blog post »
More books by James N. Anderson…
James’s Recent Updates
|
James N. Anderson
wrote a new blog post
|
|
“Your worldview is concerned with what you believe, and what you believe influences how you behave—and no one would say it doesn’t matter how you behave.”
― What's Your Worldview?: An Interactive Approach to Life's Big Questions
― What's Your Worldview?: An Interactive Approach to Life's Big Questions
“Worldviews also largely determine people’s opinions on matters of ethics and politics. What you think about abortion, euthanasia, same-sex relationships, public education, economic policy, foreign aid, the use of military force, environmentalism, animal rights, genetic enhancement, and almost any other major issue of the day depends on your underlying worldview more than anything else”
― What's Your Worldview?: An Interactive Approach to Life's Big Questions
― What's Your Worldview?: An Interactive Approach to Life's Big Questions
“If the laws of logic are metaphysically dependent on God, it follows that every logical argument presupposes the existence of God. What this means is that every sound Theistic argument not only proves the existence of God but also presupposes the existence of God, insofar as that argument depends on logical inference. Indeed, every unsound theistic argument presupposes the existence of God. And the same goes, naturally, for every anti-theistic argument. The irony must not be missed: one can logically argue against God only if God exists.”
―
―
