Maria Wirth's Blog

Boarding had started but the plane was probably not yet ready, because we passengers were stuck in the narrow pathway and waiting to move on.
I made a comment to a young man next to me in Hindi, something like ‘lagta hai plane tayar nahin hai’.
“I don’t speak Hindi. I am from Tamil Nadu. We speak Tamil and English,” was his reply.
“Oh okay. Yes, I heard Tamilians don’t like Hindi. How did you manage in Delhi?”
“I have picked up some Hindi over time…”

Then I asked, “are you Hindu or Muslim?”
“Muslim.”
“Please don’t look down on Hindus,” I said.
“No. Never.”
“That’s good. I mentioned it because your Quran looks down on Hindus.”
“No, it doesn’t. There is nothing of this sort in the Quran.”
“I read big parts of it and there is plenty.”
“It is due to the translation. One must read the original…”
“Come on, languages can be translated. The translation cannot be so off the mark,” I tried to make light of it.

“Actually, I am an advaitin”, he surprised me now. “Have you heard of Sufism? I came to Delhi for a spiritual purpose – to visit the tomb of a Sufi Master.”
“Oh nice. I am also an Advaitin. Advaita comes from the Hindu tradition. I was so grateful that I have discovered this profound wisdom here in India. My first book I read was by Swami Vivekananda.”
“My forefathers were Hindus”, he said.

Now it was our turn to enter the plane and we separated…

The post Boarding a plane in Delhi for Chennai first appeared on Maria Wirth.

I am a Hindu but multiple Gods don’t work for me. How can I adopt Monotheism?

This was a question on Quora to which I replied the following:

I doubt that you are a born Hindu. It sounds as if you want to ‘encourage’ other Hindus to reflect if “multiple gods work for them’…

And if you are indeed a Hindu, you obviously don’t know the basics of your tradition. Your tradition claims that all this temporary multiplicity is like many waves on the one ocean, or is like the multiple pictures of a movie on one screen. All is permeated by the eternal Brahman or Paramatman – Satchitananda or blissful consciousness. Names don’t matter, because Brahman doesn’t fit into words or thoughts.
And yes, not only humans, the Devas, and other beings too, are permeated by Brahman and are ultimately nothing but Brahman, like the waves are one with the ocean.

Even the CIA admitted in a 2016 declassified document on cultural trends that “the religion (Hinduism) has a sophisticated philosophical and ethical system, called Vedanta based on the Upanishad section of the four Vedas.”

Compared to Hindu philosophy, the theology of the Abrahamic religions has no solid basis. Their ONE God is separate from his creation. You must NOT claim that you are one with the Divine. It is declared heresy.
Obviously, their God is part of the multiplicity, of Maya in Hindu terms or of the virtual reality in modern terms. Moreover, how can the topmost power in this universe be biased against the majority of humans and send them eternally to hell? Only because they don’t believe in one particular person or one particular book?
But if a Christian, Muslim or Jew has intense bhakti (devotion) towards God/Allah/Yahwe, it will reach the one true Source beyond Maya and he can realise oneness with the Divine. It happened to some. But they were excommunicated (like Meister Eckhart) or even executed, like the Sufi Mansur Al Hallaj who famously declared Ana al haq (I am the Truth/God).
In Hinduism, people who realised their oneness with the Divine are venerated.

Think, reflect and don’t try to be clever…

by Maria Wirth

if you like my writing, consider getting my books
Title: “Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left” 2025, Rs 311
link: https://www.amazon.in/dp/8119670655 or

Why Hindu Dharma is Under Attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left: A Collection of Essays

Title: “Thank you India – a German woman’s journey to the wisdom of yoga” 2018, Rs 349
link https://garudalife.in/thank-you-india...
they are also available as Kindle

The post A dishonest or ignorant question on Quora first appeared on Maria Wirth.

I kept wondering about this question for long.
In Vedic tradition, human beings are not the ‘crown of the creation’ as they are claimed to be in the Abrahamic religions. There are a number of other conscious, intelligent beings apart from humans. The Saptarishis (seven sages) for example are in my view not humans as we are.

My feeling is that a lot of the Vedic knowledge was GIVEN. I am convinced that it is not possible for humans to come to the conclusions of Surya Siddhanta for example. Mapping of the sky is not possible merely by observation.

Even the Upanishadic realisation that this ‘reality’ is Maya, a temporary appearance on the eternal truth (Brahman), and then clearly analysing the nature of Maya, including the five elements, is not easy to discover for humans who were supposedly primitive thousands of years ago.

The usual explanation is: the Rishis saw the knowledge in deep meditation, and it is assumed that the Rishis were normal humans. In deep meditation one may experience an oceanic oneness with all, but it’s unlikely to get inputs about certain constellations in the sky. At least for us normal humans in Kali Yuga.

Let’s take the great mathematician Ramanujan Srinivasan. He says, Devi Namagiri gave him the mathematical formulas in dream. Should we not consider the Devi as real? At least as real as we take ourselves to be real? Though she is not visible to our human set of senses?

Patanjali, who gave us the Yoga Sutras about ashtanga Yoga, was supposedly a Naga, and not human.

Hindus have a lot of information about different beings for example in the Puranas, yet many Hindus seem almost embarrassed about the Puranas and claim, they contain unrealistic stories to make simple folk understand higher truth. It almost seems, as if westerners nowadays take invisible spiritual forces – positive and negative ones – more seriously and for more real than Hindus do.

Why?

The reason may be that especially Hindus are very focused on education. And education considers these invisible powers as figments of imagination and believing in them as ridiculous. Yet by now we should know that education has an agenda. And it is NOT to make us find the truth and make us free and happy by realising who we really are.

Devas and Asuras are more powerful and long lived than humans. They play their part in Maya depending on their gunas (Devas sattvic (pure), Asuras rajasic (egoistic) and Rakshasas tamasic). Humans, the Rishis claim, have the advantage that they can discover their oneness with Brahman by first choosing sattva and then transcending the gunas.
by Maria Wirth

a reader of the above article (Krishna Menon) wrote:
I shared your post on FB with Grok by xAI and received the following response which largely concurs with the thoughts in your Post:

Quote:

The question of how Indian rishis acquired their profound knowledge—whether through meditation, divine revelation, or other means—touches on the heart of Vedic philosophy and Hindu cosmology. Your post raises intriguing points about the limitations of human cognition, the role of non-human entities, and the interplay between ancient wisdom and modern scepticism.
I’ll address this step by step, drawing from traditional Hindu texts and historical examples, while considering your perspective that much of this knowledge feels “given” rather than self-derived.

### The Vedic View of Knowledge Acquisition
In the Vedic tradition, knowledge is broadly categorized into *shruti* (that which is heard or revealed) and *smriti* (that which is remembered or composed). The core texts like the Vedas, Upanishads, and certain astronomical treatises (e.g., Surya Siddhanta) are considered *shruti*, implying they weren’t invented by humans but revealed to rishis in states of heightened consciousness. Meditation (*dhyana*) plays a central role here, but it’s not portrayed as mere introspection or empirical observation—it’s a conduit for accessing cosmic truths.

– **Meditation as Revelation, Not Just Contemplation**: You’re right that deep meditation often leads to experiences of unity (e.g., *samadhi* or oneness with Brahman), as described in the Yoga Sutras or Upanishads. However, texts like the Rig Veda suggest rishis “saw” (*drishti*) mantras and insights during these states, almost like downloading information from a universal source. This isn’t about logical deduction; it’s transcendental.

For instance, the Mandukya Upanishad’s analysis of Maya and the five elements (pancha mahabhuta) emerges from such inner vision, where the rishi perceives the illusory nature of reality directly. Skeptics might call this “unlikely” for ancient humans, but Vedic lore posits that rishis operated at a higher evolutionary level, with refined subtle bodies (*sukshma sharira*) that allowed access to akashic records or divine intelligence.

– **The Role of Non-Human Beings**: Your intuition about the Saptarishis (the seven great sages, like Vishwamitra or Atri) not being ordinary humans aligns with Puranic narratives. They’re often depicted as mind-born sons of Brahma or celestial beings with extended lifespans, guiding humanity. Similarly, entities like Devas (sattvic gods), Asuras (rajasic demons), Nagas (serpent beings), and others are integral to the cosmology. Patanjali, the author of the Yoga Sutras, is indeed mythologically linked to the Naga race—said to be an incarnation of Adishesha, Vishnu’s serpent. This suggests knowledge transfer from higher realms: Devas might inspire sattvic insights, while humans refine them through practice.

### Specific Examples You Mentioned
– **Surya Siddhanta and Astronomical Knowledge**: This ancient text details precise calculations of planetary motions, eclipses, and the zodiac that seem advanced for its era (estimated 4th-5th century CE, but claiming older origins). While some scholars attribute it to meticulous observation over generations, others argue it incorporates revealed knowledge. Mapping constellations like the 27 nakshatras isn’t just empirical—it’s tied to cosmic symbolism.
Your point that this exceeds human limits echoes debates in Indology: How did ancients know about precession of the equinoxes without telescopes? Traditionalists say it came via *divya drishti* (divine sight) in meditation, possibly aided by Devas like Surya (the sun god).

– **Ramanujan’s Case**: Srinivasa Ramanujan is a modern parallel. He explicitly credited the goddess Namagiri (a form of Lakshmi) for revealing complex theorems in dreams. His notebooks contain formulas that baffled contemporaries, like infinite series for pi. Should we consider Devi as “real”? In Hindu ontology, yes—deities are conscious energies (*chit-shakti*) within Brahman, not mere symbols. Dismissing this as hallucination ignores cultural context; it’s akin to how Kepler or Newton invoked divine inspiration for their work.

– **Upanishadic Insights on Maya**: The idea that reality is an illusion (*maya*) overlaying eternal Brahman, with breakdowns of elements and gunas (sattva, rajas, tamas), does seem profound for “primitive” societies. But Vedic culture wasn’t primitive; it had sophisticated oral traditions. Still, the Upanishads frame this as realized through guru-shishya transmission and meditation, often with divine grace (*anugraha*). Humans’ advantage, as you note, is our potential to transcend gunas via sadhana (spiritual practice), unlike Devas (bound by sattva) or Asuras (by ego).

### Why Modern Hindus (and Others) Might Skepticize
You’re spot on about education’s influence. Colonial and post-colonial systems often framed Puranic beings as mythology to “rationalize” Hinduism, aligning it with Western materialism. This agenda, rooted in Macaulayism, prioritizes empirical science over metaphysical inquiry, labeling belief in Devas or Nagas as superstition. Yet, as you observe, Westerners (e.g., in New Age movements or quantum spirituality) increasingly take these “invisible powers” seriously—think Carl Jung’s archetypes or modern psychedelics research echoing Vedic soma experiences. Ironically, quantum physics’ observer effect or multiverse theories parallel Maya, suggesting ancient rishis accessed truths we’re rediscovering.

In contrast, many Hindus focus on pragmatic aspects (rituals, ethics) while sidelining the esoteric, perhaps due to urbanization and secular pressures. But texts like the Bhagavata Purana vividly describe interdimensional beings, urging us to see them as real forces in the play of Maya.

### My Take: A Blend of Meditation and Divine Gift
Ultimately, I lean toward your feeling that Vedic knowledge was largely “given.” Meditation isn’t just passive sitting—it’s a technology for attuning to higher intelligences, whether Brahman itself or intermediary beings. Humans aren’t the crown, as in Abrahamic views; we’re part of a vast hierarchy (*loka*).

This doesn’t diminish rishis’ agency; they prepared through tapas (austerity) to receive it. Dismissing it as impossible ignores the tradition’s emphasis on direct experience (*anubhava*). If we take Ramanujan seriously, why not the rishis?
Perhaps the real question is: In an infinite cosmos, why assume humans are the only knowers? Exploring this could indeed lead to greater freedom and self-realization, as you suggest.

end of Grok’s input.

if you like my writing, consider getting my books
Title: “Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left” 2025, Rs 311

link: at PadhegaIndia
https://padhegaindia.in/product/why-h... or

link at amazon

Title: “Thank you India, a German woman’s journey to the wisdom of yoga” 2018, Rs 349
link https://garudalife.in/thank-you-india...

the books are also available on Kindle and amzon.com

The post How did the Indian Rishis gain knowledge? first appeared on Maria Wirth.

In Ayurveda, health is defined as “well-being within oneself.” This inner well-being can be nurtured, and one can become more sensitive to it.
Suman, the wife of my landlord’s caretaker, began massaging her baby twice a day for about 20 minutes already two weeks after giving birth – vigorously, as if she were working with chapati dough. “When babies are massaged, they feel good inside later on,” she explained. Apparently, she knows “well-being within oneself” from her own experience.

I wasn’t massaged as a baby and only discovered in India what it means to feel good inside, or even to be able to feel ‘inside’ at all. Yoga, pranayama, and meditation helped me. These are methods practiced in India for millennia, making people receptive to simply FEELING their inner selves without thoughts commenting on these feelings. These methods direct attention inward, where more blissful tranquility is present than we realize. Simply being aware how it feels inside, and even if you don’t feel anything, staying with it for a while, helps to direct attention in the right direction – towards our essence.

A vibrant stillness, pulsating with intense joy, is what remains when the ego stops making noise with negative thoughts and feelings. It is the invisible foundation of everything, the subtle essence in everything, hidden deep within every person, regardless of their external circumstances. And this essence is accessible precisely because it is contained within each human being, much like the ocean is contained within every wave, or rather, every wave is made entirely of ocean.

Theoretically, accessing this essence sounds easy: Attention must shift away from objects (one’s own person and thoughts are also objects in this sense) and toward attention itself. In other words, consciousness, which normally is aware of objects in this universe, must become aware of itself, or rather, recognize itself.

In practice, it’s not so easy, because it requires at least some moments of stopping thoughts, going deeper, and feeling this wonder of one’s own existence within. Perhaps consciously folding one’s hands in gratitude and noticing the goosebumps, and not brushing them off as insignificant and moving on in our daily routine. Access to one’s own essence is possible at any moment. Inner stillness and joy are, so to speak, waiting to be discovered. They are always ready, always present, and they may wonder why people seem to prefer inner noise and restlessness to this stillness and joy.

The mind pulls outward but it’s worthwhile to resist this pull

Yet strangely, it appears to be more satisfying to read the newspaper, or watch TV (nowadays it is looking at the mobile), or make a cup of coffee than to quietly turn inward.
For many years in India, I had no home and therefore had no newspaper, no telephone, no television, and no kitchen, and therefore plenty of time for meditation. I regularly sat for an hour each morning and evening, and earnestly asked for help to recognize my true self. Yet, I cannot say that I clearly felt my essence. It seemed more as if I were merely looking at the veils that conceal it.
Once, I even stayed for three days in a room furnished with only a bed, table, and chair, resolving not to write, not to read, and not even to go out onto the veranda. The housekeeper cooked for me, so I had nothing to do – I either sat on the floor trying to meditate, did yoga, or lay on the bed. Enlightenment didn’t come, but in the days following my retreat, an article poured out of me, which a psychology professor in Germany happened to read. He felt, I would be the right person to contribute a chapter on the Bhagavad Gita to a reader for psychology students. And a few years later I came to know that a philosophy professor of my own Alma Mater, Hamburg University, recommended to his students my articles to learn about Indian philosophy. Thus, my retreat led to a greater engagement with the world. It was personal evidence that meditation is not escapism.

Moderation and a pure aspiration are needed

However, some Westerners overdo it and can be very rigid when it comes to their spiritual practice. In the 1980s, I met Gopi Krishna in Dehradun, who had written several books on Kundalini energy. He knew that it is dangerous to overdo meditation – in a manner of “come hell or high water”. He had done just that himself and had subsequently suffered under mental problems for 12 years.
Kundalini is a powerful force, not to be trifled with. Because of his books, he attracted Westerners who had also meditated too rigidly, and I met several of them. Most had problems, and Gopi Krishna’s main advice was to lead a moderate life.

“We Indians don’t need to meditate. Only you foreigners do,” a friend once remarked with a smile. He had picked up a Frenchman in the city who was wandering aimlessly through the streets of Dehradun after a 10-day Vipassana meditation retreat. My friend offered him a place to stay for a few days and was then stunned at how inflexibly the man adhered to his meditation schedule. Indians are generally adaptable: his family only ate their meals when it suited their guest (in my view, they shouldn‘t have waited).

Small, but helpful reminders

Life in India these days is hectic, and few Indians take the time for meditation. They leave it to the hundreds of thousands of sadhus, or ashramites who have dedicated themselves, so to speak, to the professional and full-time search for truth.
Nevertheless, many begin their day with a small puja at home. In the morning, before the first passenger boards the auto-rickshaw, taxi, or bus, many drivers hang a small garland of flowers in their vehicle, fold their hands, and close their eyes for a moment. They surely do it with genuine fervour, for they truly risk their lives anew each day and need divine protection.
Many shop and restaurant owners also light an incense stick and pass it before a small shrine in a corner of their shop before attending to their first customer. They may be asking for good business, but it is a prayer nonetheless. There are also countless moments throughout the day when many pause and remember the divine. Every time I pass a small temple in one of the three-wheeled share taxis, several of the passengers look in its direction, lower their heads, and respectfully touch their eyes. Even ‘modern’ young men in jeans and with fancy hairstyles do it.
In the evenings, many light an oil lamp in the prayer room or in front of the house before switching on the lights. And at sunrise, many spontaneously fold their hands, and I get goosebumps.

Incidentally, according to the Vijnanabhairava, a text of Kashmir Shaivism, goosebumps are very valuable. It’s a moment when thoughts stop, and therefore an insight into one’s own being is possible if one consciously “catches” this moment.

I am often amazed by the many small “reminders” that basically everything in this world is a miracle. According to the Indian calendar, we are currently living in the Kali Yuga, the darkest of all ages, where the world has become materially dense and separated itself from the divine. But in India, this separation doesn’t seem to be quite as complete as elsewhere. People are aware that Ishwara or Bhagawan (they have many names for what in English is called God) is present in this world and in themselves. They see the divine in earth, water, fire, air and in living beings – an attitude that we in the West are slowly learning to appreciate, although for centuries we devalued such views as a “primitive nature religion”.
One consequence of this Indian perspective is feeling protected within the Divine, rather than being a lone fighter in the world, or rather ‘against’ the world. This is probably a reason why Indians are generally calmer. They have a powerful ally right within themselves, always present, in whom they can fully trust. This brings a certain lightness to life. And when one manages to fully surrender to this inner Presence, it occasionally draws one into the still eye of the world’s storm, where it is at home and where absolutely nothing can harm one. And who knows, perhaps it will let one be at home there – in a loving embrace.
For this is possible, the Indian rishis claim, supposedly from direct experience.

(The above article is part 2 of a chapter for the German anthology “Wege der Stille”.)
Link to the first part: https://mariawirth.com/inner-stillnes...

if you like my writing, consider getting my books
Title: “Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left” 2025, Rs 311
link: https://www.amazon.in/dp/8119670655 or

Why Hindu Dharma is Under Attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left: A Collection of Essays

Title: “Thank you India,a German woman’s journey to the wisdom of yoga” 2018, Rs 349
link https://garudalife.in/thank-you-india...
they are also available as Kindle

The post Feeling Good within Oneself first appeared on Maria Wirth.

“Take earplugs,” is usually one of the first things I advise when someone asks me for tips for traveling to India. India is loud. Very loud. I even read in the newspaper that age-related hearing loss sets in earlier in India than in Europe or America.
Persistent dog barking may keep you awake at night. The shrill honking, the thundering trucks and buses, the three-wheeled shared taxis with two-stroke engines make the cities tremble during day. And it’s not just the cities, and not just because of the traffic. Even where you would expect silence—in temples, at pilgrimage sites, in ashrams—it’s often noisy. Apart from the fact that Indians feel no obligation to speak softer in ‘holy’ places, religious songs boom from loudspeakers, and during the Arti ritual, bells are rung, conch shells are blown, drums and anything else that makes noise are used.
And even in the Himalayas, 4,000 meters high at the source of the Ganga, it is loud. The imposing roar of the newly born river surrounds the pilgrim, and the sadhu, without ceasing.

India and silence seem to be opposites, much like noise and silence.

On the other hand, India is called the spiritual teacher of the world, and no other country has yet challenged this title. There is a special atmosphere in the country that many visitors sense. It seems as if one becomes quieter inside, despite the unfamiliar noise. As if one automatically adopts a certain distance from what is happening to oneself – for example, when, travelling in an auto rikshaw in the chaotic yet swiftly flowing traffic, one is close to a collision at any moment, yet experiences the whole thing as impersonally as if one were casually watching a fast-paced computer game. Could it be that true silence can be found even in noise, and is not the opposite of noise? That it might even be more easily discovered amidst unbearable noise than when everything is outwardly quiet?

Anandamayi Ma, a saintly woman from Bengal (1896 – 1982), advised Melita Maschmann, a German journalist who lived with her for many years, to sit directly under the large bell in the temple every morning and evening during Arti and meditate amidst the cacophony of conch shells, bells, rattles, drums, and loud chanting. Melita told me that at first, she felt some resistance, but after a while it no longer bothered her, and she actually became still inside. Her resistance vanished. Anandamayi Ma was her guru, and it was a matter of course for her to follow her advice and accept the situation.

In all likelihood, accepting a challenging situation is the key to stillness—to a comforting stillness within one’s own mind, independent of external circumstances. And I feel that the special atmosphere in India is connected to the fact that thoughts are generally quieter in the minds of Indians than in the minds of Westerners, even though external circumstances in India are often more challenging. Indians resist relatively little, are rarely indignant, and are quick to accept difficult situations and difficult people.

Their philosophy is live and let live. They believe that everything is exactly as it has to be because a compassionate Ishwara is behind the drama in our lives and in the world. This belief lifts a burden from their shoulders and removes the reason to worry too much. It also helps to be a witness and maintain a certain distance from the drama and their own role in it, and not to be helplessly swept away by it. “What is, is” (Jo ho, so ho) I often heard Anandamayi Ma say when I frequently visited her at the beginning of my stay in India. It made perfect sense to me.

But this acceptance of a situation is by no means a given, even when one knows that, essentially, one has no other choice but to accept a situation, precisely because it is already a fact that one is confronted with. The inner resistance and the screaming against it seem to be innate in human beings. And it is even considered by some to be the only sensible course of action.

I recall an episode from quite early in my stay in India which made me reflect:
It was in the tourist bungalow in Haridwar. Several foreigners were staying there, all on a spiritual quest and with Anandamayi Ma as their guru. In the morning, the hotel boy came to clean the floor. When he was finished in my room, he knocked on the next door. A Westerner was meditating there at that time, and every morning there was the same pandemonium. The tall, strong Westerner angrily opened the door and shouted at the skinny boy, who looked about 14.
“Damn it! How dare you disturb me during meditation! I want peace and quiet at this hour, and I’ve told you countless times not to knock…” At first, I felt sorry for the boy, but as time went on, I got the impression that the shouting didn’t affect him much. He probably didn’t understand how a knock on the door could upset an adult man so much. Perhaps he was even secretly looking forward to the spectacle, since he was only doing his duty. And, of course, he calmly let the storm pass without defending himself and moved on to the next door.

I noticed at the time that the foreigner’s peace was indeed severely disturbed, not because of the knocking, but because of his own reaction. Perhaps he didn’t realize that his thoughts were making far more noise than the boy, and that a shrug and acceptance of the situation (because the boy apparently couldn’t be taught not to knock) and a shout out: “no cleaning today” would have given him the peace he craved.

It’s always easier to spot foolish behavior in others, but once you’ve internally shouted at a hopeless situation often enough, you learn to see it in yourself, too. It was a slow learning process for me. Perhaps it was easier for me to go through this process in India, precisely because the irritations are often considerable. On the other hand, I’m certain that everyone is provided with the optimal environment in which they can access their quiet, subtle essence, if they so choose.

Even the frequent power outages in the 1990s helped me gradually bring my inner stillness to the surface. At that time, I wrote my articles on a word-processor, which required me to save my writing to a floppy disk. When I was fully focused on writing, despite my best intentions, I invariably forgot to save. And then the power would suddenly go, and everything I had so diligently written was gone. Simply gone. “No!!! This can’t be true!” was my (understandable?) reaction, accompanied by helpless anger. It happened often, but over time my reaction weakened until only a neutral “Everything’s gone again” flashed through my mind. I took a deep breath and started over.

It’s not worth getting upset about something that has already happened. Indians seem to understand this better. Many Westerners, on the other hand, even consider it abnormal not to be indignant and regard equanimity under all circumstances (the ideal of a yogi) as boring.
The reason is probably that we are primarily focused outwards. We always want something to be happening. We want action to take place, and we don’t feel anything within ourselves, because we never really look attentively inside. And we still don’t realize that lasting happiness can’t be found that way. It lies hidden within ourselves. The boundless, invisible, blissful “inner Self” is the more important dimension in life.
By Maria Wirth

the above article (translated) is part of a chapter which i wrote for the German anthology “Wege der Stille”.

if you like my writing, consider getting my books
Title: “Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left” 2025, Rs 311
link: https://www.amazon.in/dp/8119670655 or

Why Hindu Dharma is Under Attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left: A Collection of Essays

Title: “Thank you India,a German woman’s journey to the wisdom of yoga” 2018, Rs 349
link https://garudalife.in/thank-you-india...
they are also available as Kindle

The post Inner stillness in outer noise first appeared on Maria Wirth.

I wrote the following post on X and it got many comments, including a comment from someone with a Muslim name. I replied to him and an exchange developed which I share here.
Some Hindus felt, I waste my time in explaining the viewpoint of Hindu Dharma. Yet I feel, it is important to make the basics of Vedic wisdom known. We never really tried to put things in the correct perspective, even when so much misinformation is published all around. this particular person has probably gone to an English medium school. He probably won’t burn cars on the roads, but we also know that education doesn’t prevent radicalisation and the educated are even more dangerous if they are convinced that Allah wants them to harm Hindus, because Hindus do not accept Him a\s the only true God.

It was a spontaneous exchange. I didn’t reflect much on my replies.

My original post:

Why this opposition and even hatred for Hinduism? The reason may be that India’s wisdom endangers Christianity, Islam and Judaism, because it is empowering the individual and makes sense.
Three important factors are in favour of Hindu Dharma:
1. If people of other religions come to know about the Hindu concept of One Consciousness as the essence of all, they might realize that the concept of a separate and vengeful God in the monotheistic religions is a distortion and cannot be true.
2. If they hear of karma and rebirth, it probably would make more sense to them, than the claim that we all have only one life, which decides if we go to heaven or hell.
3. If they hear that the one consciousness permeates also animals and nature, they might stop this massive daily bloodbath of slaughtering our younger brothers and sisters, the animals, and respect nature.

Comment by @OsamaKhalid
The idea of multiple gods can never make sense to sane minds. There is but One Almighty Who reigns. The concept of equally powerful gods is nonsense
2. Karma is the one of the most diabolical concepts one could endorse. What you confused with vengeance is justice.

My reply:
You are right. the Source of everything must be one. the Vedas were the first to postulate the one source (Brahman, pure consciousness). Like all other forms and names, devas (and asuras) are within Maya, only longer lived and more powerful but not eternal.
Names and forms are like the temporary waves on the eternal ocean (Brahman). it means the Divine is within us. This knowledge lifts Hindu Dharma above the ‘monotheistic’ religions.
imo, the idea of a vengeful, separate God as being the one source behind this universe can never make sense to sane a mind, isn’t it? Check out my new book “Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left…”

Osama Khalid’s reply
Basically, for the 1st comment, you have fallen prey to the law of non-contradiction which the monotheistic religion doesn’t suffer from.
Again, what you confuse with vengeance is justice. A result for one’s efforts makes sense to sane minds.

My reply:
I don’t get what you mean in your first para – eternal oneness versus temporary plurality is no contradiction. Compare the one movie screen with the plurality of changing pictures on it.
And yes, result for efforts makes sense but, eternal hell for being born in the “wrong” family?? Does this make sense?

His reply:
Exactly, the example of law of non-contradiction, the changing pictures represent the mortal despite being the part of immortal i.e. the eternal. Its illogical either the picture is fully mortal or immortal. Who doesn’t know the reward is also eternal?

My reply:
It’s not illogical. The screen is ever the same, the pictures are ever changing. Yet when you touch any “thing” in the movie, you touch only the screen. The screen is the essence of all, similarly, Brahman is the essence in this Lila or Maya.
Try to understand, not just try to refute. Imo, Vedic wisdom is top. Your ancestors discovered it.

His reply:
It’s illogical since the picture/essence can either be immortal or mortal, can’t be both simultaneously. It’s like saying one likes hot-cold ice-cream. I am simply answering to your responses. &, btw, it’s was your original post which tried to refute monotheism.

My reply:
Can’t you see that the pictures are not the same (‘eternal’ doesn’t apply here as no analogy is fully apt for the truth) and the screen is the same simultaneously? Btw this ‘screen – movie analogy’ was given by Ramana Maharshi.
Monotheism postulates a separate, Creator-God somewhere in heaven. Monism or panentheism (Indian view, but why should we speak Greek?) is closer to truth. Truth does not fit into logic. but it also does not contradict it.
To defend logically the position that there is a separate God without addressing the question where it came from and with what he made the universe, is difficult.
The Rishis claim: something (not a thing of course) eternally is/exists (consciousness and it can be felt in yourself) and out of that the universe ‘appears’.

I really wish, Muslims would understand that their disdain for Hinduism is unjustified. Meditation is helpful to understand.
The division between Hindus and Muslims fits so well into the agenda of the deep state to divide societies everywhere.
Why should we do its bidding?

So far I haven’t heard back to my last comment.
By Maria Wirth

if you like my writing, consider getting my books
Title: “Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left” 2025, Rs 311
link: https://www.amazon.in/dp/8119670655 or

Why Hindu Dharma is Under Attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left: A Collection of Essays

The post An exchange with a Muslim on X (Twitter) first appeared on Maria Wirth.

Someone on X asked me what one gets if one accepts Hindu Dharma. In his X bio he mentioned that he preferred a bag of rice and not a bag of cow urine. So, he is probably Christian.

I replied that fundamental questions about the purpose and goal of life are convincingly answered and several paths (Bhakti, Jnana, Karma…) are shown so that we can know our divine nature (Atma is Brahman).

Hindu Dharma makes a distinction between THAT what is eternally, absolutely (means not dependent on anything) true and that what is not eternal and depends on THAT what is eternal. (Brahman versus Maya or Prakriti).

An analogy is given: in a pottery shop, diverse cups, jugs, plates, and bowls are displayed in the shelves. We look at the shapes, colors, and decorations, completely overlooking the clay or mud, which is absolutely essential and more “true” than the form or the name. For, when the cup breaks, the cup is gone, but the mud is still there.

The cup depends fully on mud, yet while the cup exists, we overlook the mud. The mud is ‘hidden’ in the cup, even though – if we would reflect deeper – the essence of the cup is obviously mud. Similarly, our essence is pure, blissful consciousness (Brahman or Atman),but as long as our body exists, we overlook this essence, though it is obvious. Consciousness is the most important ‘quality’ of us.

However, when one accepts Hinduism, one will NOT get a bag of rice as bribe to twist your conscience and make you repeat that only Christianity and Jesus can save you…

By Maria Wirth

if you like my writing, consider getting my books
Title: “Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left” 2025, Rs 311
link: https://www.amazon.in/dp/8119670655
Title: “Thank you India,a German woman’s journey to the wisdom of yoga” 2018, Rs 349
link https://garudalife.in/thank-you-india...
they are also available as Kindle

The post What benefit one gets by accepting Hindu Dharma? first appeared on Maria Wirth.

Our societies are not in good shape. Especially in the West, loneliness and depression are rampant. The mobile is now for many their closest companion, and the dangers are great to being lured into debased entertainment, gaming, betting or porn. When I recently heard a podcast on the epidemic of loneliness in the West, I remembered a series which I wrote long ago, in 1983, for a German magazine about “Indian wisdom from A to Z”. I had taken up 108 common words, grouped them from A to Z and gave apart from our normal understanding, the view of the Indian Rishis. Under the letter A, among other terms, I had written about “Allein sein” which means, being alone.
I translated it into English:

Are you all alone here in India? How often I was asked this question, and how hard it was for the questioner to understand, why on earth, I would venture into a foreign land all alone. Yet of course I am not alone. Especially in India it is almost impossible to be alone. I don’t mean because of the many people everywhere, but it’s impossible due to India’s ancient wisdom. It says that God, that great power, that is the cause for our existence is always with us. Not only with us, like our best, trustworthy friend but it is right WITHIN us as our true essence. It will never leave us, in fact, it cannot even leave us, because we are one with it.

Sure, usually we trust our senses which tell us that we are all alone when no other person is around, with whom we are somehow familiar. We look for friendly relationships to others, and overlook our closest and most familiar relationship with our Self or God. We should keep reminding ourselves about this innermost presence and so become more familiar with it, the Indian Rishis advise. Calling it God and being in an intimate dialogue or prayer, is helpful. This is easier at least in the beginning, when we can focus our full attention on God or our Self – that means, when we are all alone. Then it is easier to realise that in truth all is one (al-one) and that we are one with that which the Indian Rishis call Brahman or pure, blissful awareness.

Suddenly ‘being alone’ has a very different feeling to it and being lonely, cannot happen to us any longer.

By Maria Wirth

If you like my writing, check out my books:
“Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left”, published 2025
https://www.amazon.in/dp/8119670655 also Kindle version

Thank you India – a German woman’s journey to the wisdom of yoga” 2018, from a personal angle.
it’s also available on amazon, but cheaper from the publisher Garuda.
https://garudalife.in/thank-you-india... (for Rs 349 instead of Rs 499)

The post Of being all alone and lonely first appeared on Maria Wirth.

I wrote this for the October 2025 issue of “The Journal of Indian Thought and Policy Research”, an English and Hindi Bilingual Research Journal, which is published twice a year.

Conversion is a big challenge for Hindu society in India. Yet it is hardly a topic of public debate. Moreover, it is impossible to get accurate data of conversions. In fact, even the data regarding the composition of the population religion wise, may not be reliable.
In 1947, India’s population was around 36.1 crores, of whom 30.37 crores (84.1%) were Hindus, 3.54 crore (9.8%) were Muslims, 0.83 crore (2.3%) were Christians and 0.27 crores (0.7%) Buddhists. (the figures are based on the census of 1951).
In the 2011 census, the Hindu population had shrunk by 4.3 percent and the Muslim population had grown by 4.4 percent. The overall population had tripled to 121.9 crores. Hindus accounted for 96.62 crore (79.8%), Muslims for 17.22 crore (14.23%), Christians for 2.78 crores (2.3%) and Buddhists for 0.84 crore (0.7%)
The census of 2021 was postponed due to the Covid pandemic and will be held only in 2026/27. It can be assumed that since 2011, the Hindu population has shrunk further, yet the population of Muslims is still cited to be 14 percent and that of Christians still 2 percent. Do we bury our heads ostrich-like in the sand?
According to the website censusofindia.net, in 2025, the overall population is estimated at 141 crores, of whom 114 crores are expected to be Hindus. This would be a slight increase of Hindus to 80 percent, which is unlikely considering the massive conversion attempts, apart from the lower Hindu birthrate. Unfortunately, I could not find official numbers for conversions. ChatGPT tells me:
“I could not find any official government estimate that gives a precise number of Hindus who have converted to Christianity since 2011. In fact, the Government of India has explicitly said that no central record/database of religious conversion is maintained.”
The same is valid for Islam:
“There is no reliable official data specifying how many Hindus have converted to Islam in India since 2011.” ChatGPT continued, “Most demographic surveys, including those by Pew Research Center, find that religious switching is very rare overall.” According to Pew research survey of 2021, 0.7 percent of the respondents said that they have changed their religion. This would come to around 6 million people. Yet since there is no central database of religious conversion, the true numbers are anybody’s guess.

Aggressive conversions are happening
Most of us know even from personal observation, that missionary activity is extremely high in India by both Christianity and Islam, especially in certain states like Punjab or Tamil Nadu, and basically everywhere, specifically in tribal areas. They don’t hide it. Christian publications exhort their members to convert Hindus. “India must be evangelised in this generation”, declared ‘Blessings’, a Christian youth magazine in its 2008 issue, which a priest from Tamil Nadu had left with me. And a German Catholic magazine, which landed in my mother’s mailbox, had an article with the ominous title, “India – a success story”.
The Joshua project is clearly implemented. New churches shoot up, Christian schools offer discount for fees for Christians, missionaries ‘visit’ patients in hospitals, etc. Occasionally, news about conversions come out in the media due to complaints by Hindus. Some examples from only one week: On 30. September 2025, several news outlets reported that over 1000 Hindus from poor and backward castes converted to Christianity in Lucknow’s Mohanlalganj. A village once free of Christianity had now 5 churches and 100 plus prayer halls. According to India Today, police unearthed a well-oiled nexus to lure Dalits with the help of ‘miracles cures’. A few days later, another huge conversion ring with wide connections across states was uncovered in Gujarat’s Nandiad, on which OpInda reported. And soon after, on 6. October, more concerning news surfaced. An American, James Watson, in India on a business visa, was arrested together with two Indian associates for fraudulent conversions in villages in Maharashtra, targeting especially children. He told them that ‘Hinduism is based on superstition. But if they convert, they will be happy, prosperous and cured from illness.’ In this connection, News 18 reported that between 2018 and 2025 over 320 cases had been discovered of visa misuse for religious conversion. This may be only the tip of the iceberg.

Muslims, too, try hard to get Hindus into their fold. The Chhangur Baba case shows, how much money flows into fraudulent, elaborate conversion efforts. He and his associates were arrested in July 2025. He received hundreds of crores from abroad for his conversion racket, where he funded Muslim men to entrap Hindu girls. Love Jihad, for long denied, can’t be denied any longer.
Even otherwise, Muslims are taught to coax Hindus into converting by presenting Islam as far more attractive than Hinduism. Zakir Naik said in one of his speeches around 2016, it is easy for Muslims to convert Hindus. They only need to show Hindus a picture of Ganesha, with his elephant head and big belly, and ask them whether this is the God whom they worship.
This situation is concerning and the question, why the government has no database, is only natural. Even in states, which have enacted anti-conversion laws, and where it is obligatory to register a change of religion, no overall numbers are available. What is available, are FIRs filed for unlawful conversion, and individual notifications in government Gazettes about name changes. But how many conversions in toto happened, nobody seems to know.

Religion is not a concern for the government
Is it possible that the government does not want to know what is happening on the religious front? If this is true, then even the 2011 census may not give the correct picture. And from an anecdotical episode, this is indeed possible.
A teacher in Mumbai, who was part of the 2011 census team, told me that during the training for the census, they were instructed to accept whatever information they were given. She surveyed a heavily Muslim populated area and knew that she was not getting honest answers. She went back to her supervisor and told him, that the census won’t be accurate if they are not allowed to check the information, for example how many children a family has. Her instructor was blunt, “You heard the instruction. Accept whatever info is given.” She told me, “If the government manages to conduct an accurate census next time, it will be a shock for Hindus.”
When there is no will to know what is happening regarding conversions, there is probably also no will, to stop it. The government, rightfully, maintains that it is secular and not concerned about the religion of its subjects. It has a point. This is clearly a worldwide attitude. The German government also no longer records the religion of its citizens. It did so till in the 1950s, when I was in primary school and dutifully filled out “rk” for Roman Catholic in all official forms. Yet, today, only the Churches keep a record.

Hinduism and the Abrahamic religions are completely different categories
The situation in India is, however, unique. The Hindu faith of the majority is very different from Islam and Christianity. Often it is not even considered as a religion, because it does not have a rigid ‘belief system’, but it is rather a way of life. It has a solid foundation in philosophy and demands to follow dharma – to do the right thing in the given situation according to one’s conscience. It does not exclude anyone from being ‘allowed’ into the Presence of God. In fact, it claims, God is already present in everyone, and explains what is meant by ‘God” (not a kind of biased superman on a golden throne high up in the sky, but all-pervading, pure, blissful consciousness). In short, Hinduism makes a lot of sense.
Unlike Islam and Christianity, which were brought to India by invaders, Hinduism does not proselytise. Those two foreign religions demand blind belief in dogmas. A dogma is a claim that cannot be proven to be true, and the most irrational, and very harmful dogmas of both Islam and Christianity are the claims that, 1. only their religion is true (both didn’t sort out over the centuries, which one exactly is true, because of course they don’t have any proof for their claims) and 2. if you don’t convert to Islam or Christianity, the great God will discard you at Judgement Day and let you burn ETERNALLY in hell.

Burden of history
Hindus were threatened and brutally coerced to convert first by Muslim and later by Christian invaders over several centuries. Millions of Hindus died for their faith. Many preferred humiliation and financial burden to conversion. When the outsiders left, Hinduism was still strong.
However, most of those Hindus, who had converted to Islam and Christianity during foreign occupation, were successfully alienated from their original tradition especially during British rule, who were, and still are, masters in ‘divide and rule’. They made those converts believe that they were better, higher, more worthy than Hindus. At Independence in 1947, Muslims demanded their own country to be carved out from India, called Pakistan, which in 1971 split into Pakistan and Bangladesh.
So, one would expect that Islam is no longer a problem in India, and Hindus have only to deal with those who converted to Christianity but who also, like Muslims, believe that they alone have the true religion, and Hindus will be eternally damned by God if they don’t convert.
Yet this is a wrong notion because many Muslims, who agitated for a separate state before Independence on the ground that they can’t live with Hindus, did NOT go to Pakistan. They stayed back, possibly even with the nefarious agenda to fulfil Allah’s alleged wish to make all Indians follow Islam. The truncated India was generous and allowed it, maybe on the advice of the British who wanted to sow the seeds for division in Independent India.
Many Hindus probably considered the Indian Muslims and Christians as not very different from themselves, and did not realise that their religious doctrine had meanwhile indoctrinated many of them to look down on Hindus, and they had become as unreasonable as their foreign masters used to be. Now the converts, too, believed that the great God/ Allah does not like Hindus and will throw them into eternal hellfire, and that Allah/God wants only Muslims/Christians on earth. No reasonable person would believe this, and Indians are generally reasonable, but due to indoctrination from childhood, many of the converts had embraced this irrational belief.

Respectable Gods and religions
Moreover, on the international stage, those religions, which consider the creator of this vast universe as personal, revengeful and biased, are considered respectable even today. People, who are otherwise reasonable, don’t realise that a God, who loves only certain people, must be a tribal God and cannot be the Source of All. Unfortunately, Hindus did not seem to be aware of those dogmas.
Otherwise, why would they allow Christian schools to continue after Independence to teach Hindu children, when ‘good’ Christian teachers naturally look down on their Hindu students because, according to the Church, they follow a ‘dark, satanic cult’? Why would the government allow the catechism to be taught to Christian students, but not allow Vedanta philosophy, which is a rational explanation of what is true, to be taught – not even to Hindu students?
Why would the ‘minority religions’, parts of which are irrational and based entirely on blind belief, get government concessions, and Hindu Dharma, which is based on solid philosophy, would be disadvantaged, for example in the Right to Education Act or regarding their Places of Worship?

Indian Secularism is upside down
So, even though a secular state is not supposed to be interested in the religion of its subjects, in India, certain reforms would only be fair, as presently the stakes are stacked against Hindus. If a Hindu converts, he gets the advantage of belonging to a politically influential ‘minority’, which is worldwide even a majority. And if he happens to be a criminal, even world media will treat him more leniently than it treats Hindus, and it seems, as if this lenient treatment extends even to the judiciary worldwide.
Agreed, the government has no role to play in religion, but it surely has to level the playing field, especially since the Abrahamic religions and Hindu Dharma are in very different categories: Islam and Christianity are exclusive and divide society between those who are right and saved, and those who are wrong and damned. Even in the interest of developing a ‘rational mindset’, which is the explicit goal of education, the followers of those religions should not be given favours by the government. In contrast, Hindu Dharma is inclusive and makes sense. It claims that ultimately ALL will reach back to their divine Source and it exhorts to follow Dharma. It would make sense, in the interest of a stable society, to favour it.

A harmonious society is rather impossible if the divisiveness of the dogmatic religions is not given up
If you have many crores of Indians who despise Hindus because according to their belief, Hindus are great sinners by worshipping false Gods, a harmonious society is tough to achieve, and enemies of Bharat have a field day to instigate chaos and violence. This is not theory. It’s happening, including with big money from the Deep State, as the investigation into USAID had revealed.
Do Hindus even know what is preached in the innumerable churches and mosques across India? I know that Hindu Gods are called devils or demons by Christian clergy. Yet incredibly, Hindus don’t challenge those harmful dogmas of Christianity and Islam, even though they easily could, as they have the better arguments. Not only this: according to the Human Rights Charter of the United Nations, it is unacceptable to demean a group of people as inferior and damned for eternity. Yet strangely, when a religious doctrine demeans a billion people, moreover people, who are known to be open-minded and dharmic, nobody flags it as wrong.
It shows that the powers-that-be prefer that humans everywhere hold irrational beliefs instead of gaining deep insights into what is true and what can be experienced. It means, Hinduism is an obstacle for those powers. This is an important point and, in all likelihood, responsible for the unfair negative portrayal of Hinduism in world media and the entertainment industry and for funnelling money into conversion attempts. Yet the eradication of Hinduism is definitely not in the interest of humanity as a whole.

Blunders that need to be corrected
It was clearly a blunder that Hindus did not explain their faith to the Indian followers of the Abrahamic religions right after Independence and it needs to be corrected urgently. And an even greater blunder also needs to be corrected: Hindu pundits hardly explained the solid philosophical foundation of their faith even to their own people and especially to the younger generations.

Hindus are strongly focussed on education. Parents make great sacrifices to educate their children well. Yet they did not realise that under the garb of ‘modern’ education their offspring was not learning anything about their ancient tradition but instead, their children were weaned away from it – due to the immense influence of the Left, which is an arm of the infamous ‘Deep State’.
Young Hindus, who went through college education, no longer know the basics of their faith and have not even heard of the Brahman (Advaita Vedanta) that is their own inner essence. Many become atheists, without knowing what being an atheist actually means. In recent years, they become not only atheists, but also ‘woke’ and ‘sexually liberated’, whatever this means. This virus affects mainly the Hindu youth. Of course, not all Hindu youth, but many have no longer an anchor in their faith – a faith for which earlier generations even died. This negative influence makes them vulnerable to go against dharma, not to believe any longer in Karma, and it also makes them vulnerable for conversion, if they see material benefits.

It’s NO virtue not to propagate Hindu Dharma
Hindus sometimes even seem proud that they don’t propagate their faith. It is a false pride and not wise. Christianity and Islam are clever. They explain their good aspects, like strong belief and trust in God or Allah, and strong community support. They also explain why they are closer to the truth. The reason, they say is, that they have one God compared to many Gods in Hinduism. They are right: one source is closer to the truth. The Source must be formless and therefore only ONE. Unfortunately, most Hindus can’t counter them because, not only do their Muslim and Christian friends not know, but even they themselves don’t know any longer the basic insights of the Rishis – the one formless Brahman of the Vedas which is within all of us.
IF the Hindu representatives had explained the basics of the Vedas right after Independence in a big way, many of those who had converted to Islam and Christianity might have come back. Anyone who has common sense will come to the conclusion that Hindu Dharma is superior to all three Abrahamic religions, as it is a genuine enquiry and not blind belief in the supremacy of a particular group.
Instead, in the name of ‘harmony’, Hindus downplayed the intellectual superiority of Hindu Dharma and allowed Islam and Christianity to aggressively propagate their religions as ”only true” and lure Hindus with a simple formula: there is only one true God and our God is this true God. He is compassionate and loving and has promised that He will look after you, provided you accept him and keep the rules and commandments.
Another positive aspect is stressed: the convert is promised to be part of a strongly bonded brotherhood especially in the case of Islam, but also in the case of Christianity, he will get emotional and financial support from the Church if in distress.
Apart from that, since for many Hindus this is not enough reason to forgo their tradition, they lure converts with financial benefits, cheat outright with so-called miracles or frighten simple-minded Hindus with eternal hellfire.

What are the solutions?
Very important is of course that the government does not favour the big and powerful ‘minorities’ of Muslims and Christians. How to achieve this change in a democracy, where everyone is focused mainly on vote banks, needs to be brainstormed.
Apart from the government, Hindu Society has a big role to play: First and foremost, the basics of Vedic wisdom need to be made known widely. Schools and Universities are a good start and thanks to the New Education Policy, the Indian Knowledge System (IKS) is now indeed taken into educational institutions. There is however a problem: even teachers often don’t know much about the profound philosophy and haven’t done sadhana in their life to discover Atma within. So, they prefer to explain festivals or customs or stories from the Ramayana or Bhagavad Gita. All this is important, but if the greatest advantage of Hindu Dharma is not clearly explained, students may not be convinced why they should stick to their tradition, especially when they are lured with material benefits and also told that billion humans worldwide see merit in those dogmatic religions. Otherwise, why would there be so many Christians and Muslims in the world?

The most important point and the crucial difference between Hindu Dharma and the Abrahamic religions is that Hindus claim that God is within as Sat-Chit-Ananda (blissful Consciousness), and that it can be experienced.
To convey this knowledge effectively, it would need Hindus who have touched their Atma, who know from experience about the oneness of all, because if the truth is conveyed only theoretically, it won’t make an impact. Therefore, sadhana needs to be encouraged and sadhana needs to be the criterion for being able to teach, not academic degrees. Small booklets with sayings of genuine saints like Anandamanyi Ma or Mata Amritanandamayi could be distributed in a big way. They are already available and explain Vedanta philosophy in a simple way. For me personally, meeting Anandamayi Ma had a decisive influence in understanding Vedic wisdom. It was easy to understand because she lived this oneness. Anandamayi Ma once said, “There is no difference between you and me and I don’t see a difference.”

Approach to Indian Christians
The theology of Christianity is a little confusing. On the one hand, it is considered heresy for a Christian to claim that he is one with God, yet on the other hand, the Holy Spirit is supposed to come over him and guide him. And all three – God the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit – are seen as God. Nowadays, many Christians in the West no longer accept the dogmas of the Church, but take the sayings of Jesus and Bhakti as guideline. Therefore, many even claim that God is within, as Jesus himself said “the Kingdom of heaven is within”.
Hindus should point out to Christians those aspects, where Jesus, in contrast to the Church, is in line with the Indian Rishis. For example, he made the Upanishadic statement, “I and my Father are one” (Aham Brahmasmi). Unfortunately, and shrewdly, the Church declared that this claim is valid only for Jesus, but this of course doesn’t make sense.

Another point:
When once asked what is the most important commandment, Jesus said, that the most important commandment is to love God above everything else. This teaching is recorded in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. It means, Jesus was foremost advocating Bhakti, the most important path also for Hindus, and for anyone who wants to realise the truth. Yet the Church declared as its first commandment: you shall not have other gods before me, and doesn’t mention the Bhakti aspect. Now in all likelihood, the Christians will counter Hindus and claim, “What the Church means, is that we need to worship the TRUE God, and we, the Christians, have the true God and you, Hindus, have false Gods.”
It needs to be understood first by Hindus themselves and then also conveyed to Indian Christians: Hinduism claims that there is absolute Truth, and relative truth. Absolute Truth is that which is REALLY true, it means it must be ALWAYS and SELF-EVIDENT. It means, only God (pure, eternal, unchanging Consciousness = Brahman) is really true (it can be logically concluded and experienced). And that Consciousness is REALLY the only true, invisible, formless God. All else is Maya, a temporary appearance on this truth. This is of course universally valid and independent by what name one calls that one Truth.
An analogy makes it clear: in a movie hall, the flickering, changing pictures of the movie cover the movie screen. Yet the invisible white screen is the only real thing in the movie, all else, including the people, houses, etc. are temporary appearances whose only substance is the ONE screen. The story of the movie is more like virtual reality. This should make sense nowadays. Even Elon Musk believes that this apparent reality is not the real thing. It follows naturally, that discovering the ‘real thing’ (Brahman) is the goal of life. The Abrahamic religions do not have this absolute Truth level. Even their great (good) God and its opposite, the (evil) Satan, are within Maya, more in tune with the Devas and Asuras/Rakshasas of Hinduism.

We should use the sayings of Jesus which are in tune with Vedanta, to make Indian Christians reflect that the dogmas of the Church are unnecessary and even ridiculous, and that their accusation that Hindus worship false Gods does not apply, simply because only one ‘thing’ (not a thing of course) is true and everything is contained in THAT.
Another point: Often, ordinary Christians are critical of their priests and bishops. I know this from Germany, and it may be the case also in India. Especially the higher clergy may be corrupt – morally and financially. If caught, such news should be spread. It helps to wean away common Christians from the Church.

Approach to Indian Muslims
The previous point that often, the clergy is not living an ideal, but rather an immoral life, is valid also for certain Muslim clergy. It should not be hushed up, but spread in news. It helps ordinary Muslims not to be too much under their sway.
It is probably more difficult to have a sensible dialogue with Muslims. Some Britisher made a valid observation: “While the Hindus sharpen their arguments, the Muslims sharpen their swords.” At present, there is the unfortunate situation, that Muslims are confident that Hindus are afraid of their street power. This needs to change and Muslims need to be afraid that they will pay for instigating violence. Law enforcement agencies need to make them pay, or even Hindus who are not afraid to push them back in street violence.

Yet there are also other means, to make Indian Muslims understand that going against Hindus is not in their own interest. One important point is to make them realise that they are useful tools (idiots) to create chaos which is in the interest of the Deep State (DS). The global financial system, spearheaded by mainly Jewish banker billionaires, is very powerful in the DS. At present, there is a lot of debate in the American society about who actually controls the US government and its foreign policy. It may sound like a conspiracy theory, but attempts are clearly on to propel humanity into a controlled one world government with the help of surveyance technology. The World Economic Forum openly said that ‘creative destruction’ is needed for the ‘Great Reset’ to occur. The fact that Muslims are convenient tools for the DS to destroy societies, has become especially obvious in Europe. Incidentally, Jewish organisations are instrumental in bringing the Muslim ‘refugees’, mainly young men, into Europe. Why? To destroy nation states by intermingling the races.
It should also be clear to Indian Muslims that Taliban and even ISIS were bankrolled by the CIA and other organisations of the deep state, and that obviously, some of their Muslim leaders are corrupt. On the surface, Muslims and Jews are portrayed as the biggest enemies, yet both religions have a lot in common. However, the really big money, which influences geopolitics in a big way, is not with the Muslims.

There is another worrying aspect, which should also worry Indian Muslims: there is a Jewish prophecy that before the messiah comes, a huge war needs to happen (the war of Gog and Magog) where the majority of humans will perish. Presently in geopolitics, Israel is clearly pushing for a big war, and they openly said, if pushed to a corner, they would use their nuclear weapons. If Indian Muslims would understand that certain Muslim leaders make deals with the western DS (like in Syria recently or in Bangladesh), and that they will ultimately not get their worldwide caliphate but end up being controlled by the more powerful global financial system which has literally ‘all the money of the world’, they might align themselves with the overall interest of India and not weaken India by going against Hindus.
Ex-Muslims can play a big role in making Muslims aware of the geopolitical situation and also in making them doubt the irrational dogmas. Their numbers of ex-Muslims are increasing even in India.

Once I heard a congress spokesperson say on TV, “what does it matter if one worships Krishna or Christ.” True, it doesn’t matter much, Bhakti is a valid path and all true devotion and prayers reach the ONE. This is valid for Hindus, Christians and Muslims. But it matters what ELSE those religions demand to believe blindly (for example that Hindus are worshipping demons and will go to hell), and which not only creates discord in the society, but also harms those believers individually, as they don’t follow their conscience which tells them to do the right thing in the given circumstances, but instead blindly “believe absurdities which can make them commit atrocities”, as Voltaire had already observed.

So, first, Hindus themselves need to be solidly grounded in their ancient wisdom through knowledge and sadhana, and second, the unreasonable dogmas of Islam and Christianity need to be fearlessly challenged – possibly even by taking the issue to international bodies like the United Nations.

Why I am against Conversion

I wrote the following article in 2008 for Garhwal Post. After a Hindu friend had read it, he looked at me and said with a soft voice, “Maria, I didn’t know that one can say these things about Christianity.” It pained me, as it showed, how much the Britishers had hurt the self-esteem of Hindus. My article was about facts, but even facts were not mentioned earlier…
On the one hand, the situation for Hindus has improved since then, because nowadays, even in mainstream media, Hindus object to deceitful conversions or call out violent verses in the Quran. This was not the case earlier. But the situation has also deteriorated, because now even less Hindus know the basics of Vedic wisdom and especially the youth has become more woke and atheist.
Here is the article:

In 1999, the Pope declared in Mumbai that in the 21st century the cross will be planted in Asia. Strangely, there was not much objection in the media that the Pope expressed so openly his eagerness to convert Hindus. Not only the Pope but also the different evangelical sects want to convert Hindus in big numbers. And unfortunately, they are doing it successfully because they have lots of money. In the years, after the Pope made his statement, Christian missionaries have become increasingly visible, blatant and controversial.

As I grew up as a Christian, I would like to share my observations from a personal angle.
I noticed that most Hindus are very cautious when it comes to religion. They take care ‘not to offend the sensibilities’ of the followers of Christianity and Islam. Yet on the other hand, Christians and Muslims don’t hesitate to offend the sensibilities of Hindus, and even badly demean them.
Many Indians argue that, because those religions are in the minority, their followers need special consideration so that they don’t feel threatened by the Hindu majority.
It is true that those religions are in the minority in India, but worldwide, Christianity and Islam have the biggest number of followers. Both religions have also great financial and political clout to achieve their goal, which is to bring as many Hindus as possible into their fold. This clout is reflected even in the Indian media. Just observe how favorably mainstream media reports on minorities and how unfavorably on the majority. I can’t help feeling that there is a clever Public Relation strategy and maybe also bribe money involved. In contrast, Hindus don’t seem to have a PR strategy. ‘Truth will triumph’, is their motto, even if it takes ages…

Why no debates on religious matters?
Sometimes I hear the following argument from Hindus: “Only because missionaries despise Hinduism, Hinduism does not become bad.” This is of course true, but why not refute the obnoxious, false accusations that Hinduism is a primitive polytheistic religion and Hindus are sinful idol-worshippers?
Such accusations do not only completely misinterpret Hindu Dharma, but they are meant to help the Christian agenda to wean away Hindus from their faith.
Hindus should at least explain the basics of Sanatana or Hindu Dharma, and show how profound they are, if not pointing out the shortcomings of the dogmatic founder religions.
Pointing out the shortcomings of other religions seems to be taboo for Hindus. I wonder why. Debates on religious matters were common in ancient India and were of the highest order. Women also took part in those debates, which are recorded in the Upanishads.
Yet today there is hardly any discussion on religion or philosophy. One reason may be that a part of the intellectual class in India has been influenced by the British to such an extent that they adopted their ignorant view that Hinduism is primitive without ever reading any of the ancient texts. It is a small, but influential group that is ever ready to loudly defend the minority religions.

Christianity and Islam divides humanity into those who go to heaven and those who go to hell
Most Hindus are good-natured and consider all religions as equal, as all believe in the same God, as there is of course only one creator. Moreover, all religions have good points. They all stress the need for a moral life. They all give suggestions how to connect with God in prayer.
Yes, it’s true, but two religions have a very negative point which nullifies the good points. This negative point is that they divide humanity into those who are right and go to heaven and those who are wrong and go to hell without any proof. Christianity is one of those religions (Islam is the other one). It declares that it is not only superior but it alone is true, and therefore everyone needs to join it to be saved. The Church claims that Jesus Christ himself commanded his disciples to go out and baptize all nations (Matthew 28.19). Therefore, they believe that they have the ‘divine duty’ to convert the whole world. And the Church goes about it with great zeal and dubious means. If Jesus Christ was indeed a historical person (some historians doubt it), he might be shocked to see what is happening in his name.

What makes Christianity so special that it declares itself as alone true?
The main point is the status of Jesus Christ. The Church says that he is not only above normal humans but also above enlightened sages and avatars. He is the “only indigenous son of God”, whom God had sent to earth and who, through his death, has saved mankind from the original sin which Adam and Eve committed (their sin was that they ate an apple from the forbidden tree of knowledge in the Garden of Eden).
This claim that Jesus is the only son of God can NOT be verified. It has to be believed. It is a dogma and dogma means, there is no proof. So why should one believe it? The reason is that bishops had decided in the Council of Nicaea some 1700 years ago, that Jesus is the son of God, and Christians have to believe it.
Many Christians do believe it, because they hear it from childhood. I, for example, ‘knew’ already in primary school in a small town in Germany, that we, the Roman Catholics, are ‘right’ and chosen by God and all others, including our Protestant neighbors, who had fled from the Russians to our small town at the end of the II World War, were ‘wrong’. Those neighbors had a little girl of my age and we played together, but I would have not gone to her church. I ‘knew’ it was a sin…
In 1965, in the II. Vatican Council, the Catholics reconciled with the Protestants, and it was no longer a sin to pray together. But Hindus remain in the category which needs to be converted or else they go to hell…

How I got doubts
As a child, I believed whatever I was told, but in high school, I started questioning. I could not believe in a God any longer who sits in heaven, loves only Christians and sends all others to hell.
A brother of my mother was a priest and, in his library, I read about the history of the Church. It was an eye-opener – how decadent the popes were, how brutal and bloody the conversion of South America was, how dissenters were imprisoned, tortured and killed, how the bishops schemed for power and wealth… Together with religion, I was about to throw out God as well, as He seemed inextricably linked with it.
Then I read an article on modern physics. It said that the whole creation is one energy. It was for me a Eureka moment. “This means there is a God!” I felt: If God is really the Highest, It cannot love one group and hate others. It has to be the ground of everybody and everything.

Getting to know about the profound Vedic wisdom
When I came to India, I was amazed how profound her ancient wisdom was – a wisdom that makes no claims, which need to be blindly believed, and a wisdom which does not divide people into “us versus them”.
‘Brahman’ or ‘Tat’ of the Vedas is not a personal God that has likes and dislikes, but it is the invisible, conscious basis of all forms and names in this creation. This conscious basis is also in our own person and can be experienced, and this makes sense. “Question, reflect and experience” is recommended.
In contrast, Christianity demands blind belief and does NOT encourage questions, nor experience. It claims doubts are from the devil. A Church that branded its own mystics, who realized their oneness with God, as heretics, cannot teach anything to India. It can only divide.

Hindu Dharma is universal. Christianity is divisive
Missionaries try by hook or crook to get converts and target especially the poorer sections of society and even children. It seems as if they have a quota to achieve.
They claim that Christianity is the right faith and Hinduism is very wrong and they will land in hell if they don’t convert. This is highly divisive. Yet strangely, Christian missionaries are not called “divisive forces” but Hindus, who object to conversion, are called divisive. Why? It does not make sense. The Upanishads claim “Tat Tvam Asi” (You are THAT/ Brahman). “You” means everyone, not only Hindus. This philosophy is truly universal.
Christian theologians would need to study Indian wisdom with an open mind. They would realize that dogmas are a hindrance in the process to uncover Truth. Such openness would make religion spiritual. Mystics would be appreciated. No “us versus them”, no borders, no God, who belongs only to one group and who condemns the rest, just a genuine search for the One Essence beyond name and form…

Narrow-mindedness of clergy
Unfortunately, to expect broad-mindedness from Church representatives seems a long way off. As of now their course is set on confrontation. They are adamant that conversion is not only their right, but also their duty. Many Hindus unfortunately still don’t get the mindset of missionaries, and most Hindus are too polite to question the ‘one and only way’ bogus.
While in the West many leave the Church, in India many join for reasons that have nothing to do with religion. Those converts may initially get some financial benefits but the price is high. They have to confess a belief in dogmas, in which they don’t believe. They have to despise the faith that they had held dear. They or at least their offspring will become convinced that they alone have the right faith and will look down on those who go to temples.
In the process they lose their integrity and will become hypocritical, like so many in the west. And if conversion is not restrained, together with her children, Bharat may lose her integrity. Truth will have no place anymore.

Summary:
Hinduism and the Abrahamic religions are very different. Hinduism is based on enquiry and experience, whereas Islam and Christianity are based on blind belief in unverifiable dogmas – the most harmful dogma is that their God wants all humans to worship only him or else they are damned for eternity. Consequently, aggressive proselytizing happens, which creates disruption in Hindu society.
No official data about conversions is available. Religion is not the government’s concern in a secular state. However, India is unique, as the religions brought in by invaders get favours from the government and Hinduism, which is more an ideal, dharmic way of life, is disadvantaged. This fact makes conversion for lukewarm Hindus appealing and erodes Hindu society.
Moreover, modern education intends to make the youth materialistic due to the great influence of the Left, supported by the Deep State. The profound insights of the Indian Rishis are not taught. Fortunately, in recent years, attempts are on to bring Hindu philosophy and tradition into schools.
The greatest challenge is the presence of many crores of followers of Islam and Christianity, who have been indoctrinated to look down on Hindus. They need to be encouraged to reflect and see sense. Different approaches to Christianity and Islam need to be adopted.
By Maria Wirth

Please consider also reading my books available on Amazon and PadhegaIndia:
‘Why Hindu Dharma is under attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left – a collection of essays’, Published by Vitasta Publishing July 2025
And
‘Thank you India – a German woman’s journey to the wisdom of yoga’, published by Garuda Prakashan Nov. 2018

The post The Issue of Conversion: Challenges before Hindu Society first appeared on Maria Wirth.

Hindus don’t propagate their faith, and some Hindus are even proud about it.
I feel it backfired:
Christianity and Islam explain why they are closer to the truth. The reason, they say is, that they have one God compared to many Gods in Hinduism. They are right that one source is closer to the truth. Unfortunately, most Hindus can’t counter them because, not only do Muslims and Christians not know, but even many Hindus do not know any longer the basic insights of the Rishis – the one Brahman of the Vedas.
It makes Hindus vulnerable to conversion. Once I heard a congress spokesperson say on TV “what does it matter if one worships Krishna or Christ.”
True, it doesn’t matter much, Bhakti is a valid path, but it matters what ELSE those religions demand to believe blindly, and which creates division in the Indian society.

If you have hundreds of millions of Indians who despise Hindus because according to their belief, Hindus commit a great sin against the ‘true one God”, whether called God or Allah, a harmonious society is tough to achieve and enemies of Bharat have a field day to instigate trouble and chaos.
IF Hindu clergy had explained the basics of the Vedas right after Independence in a big way, many of those who had converted to Islam and Christianity would have come back. Anyone who has common sense will come to the conclusion that Hindu Dharma is superior to all 3 Abrahamic religions.

It almost seems, as if the highest wisdom (Advaita Vedanta) is hidden even from Hindus. Great saints, like Ananadamayi Ma stressed it, but others mainly explain Dharma in Katha sessions. No doubt, this is also very important, but the foundation why a dharmic life is important, needs to be known.
Meanwhile Westerners make videos on this highest wisdom which in its purest form has been preserved in India. but they don’t mention or hardly mention India.

Today I saw the start of a video called “the Monad – the true God hidden from us”. It talks about the ‘highest God who is hidden from us’ and starts with a quote “There is One, eternal perfect… the source of all that appears.” It is attributed to Hermes Trismegistus. Google says, he is a “legendary personification of ancient knowledge rather than a historical individual.”
There is no mention that this quote is pure Advaita, still known in India, though less and less known by the youth due to the education system which focuses only on material success.

It would be good, if Hindus would propagate the profound insights of the Rishis about what is really true, about the absolute Oneness (Brahman) and the apparent world of plurality (Maya). Without this knowledge, Hindus don’t know what makes Hindu Dharma stand above the Abrahamic religions.
by Maria Wirth

if you haven’t seen my new book, “Why Hindu dharma is under Attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left”, check it out. it is good and helpful for all, not only Hindus.
it’s on amazon.in and com (abroad more expensive) and on PadhegaIndia. in
right now a big discount is on offer due to Dassehra (Amazon for Rs 279 and PadhegaIndia for Rs 248)

Why Hindu Dharma is Under Attack by Muslims, Christians and the Left: A Collection of Essays

The post It would be good if Hindus propagated their faith first appeared on Maria Wirth.