Jim Slaughter's Blog: Robert's Rules & Parliamentary Procedure

Congratulations to Law Firm Carolinas partner Adam Marshall, who has been elected to the Greensboro City Council. A lifelong Greensboro resident and experienced attorney, Adam has long served the city through leadership (often as Chair) on key commissions and boards, including the: He ran a positive campaign and secured a commanding victory, by capturing 67% to 33% of the votes—an impressive achievement in these divisive times. Adam’s solid understanding of city government, steady temperament, and interest in working with others to find practical solutions will make him an excellent member of the Greensboro City Council. Congratulations, Adam!

The post Adam Marshall Elected to Greensboro City Council appeared first on Law Firm Carolinas.

These are trying times. Whether because of the political climate, social media, or the stresses of modern life, poor conduct at meetings has become common. As attorneys and experienced professional parliamentarians, Carole Albright and I assist with many meetings of every size each year. Members, and even directors, seem shorter and snappier than ever. We increasingly hear directors say things like: “I can’t work with that board member.” “I won’t be in the same room as that director.” “Can’t we handle everything by email?” The answer to that last one is no, but the real issue runs deeper. Directors don’t … Continue reading →

The post Is Your Dislike of Another Board Member a Breach of Your Fiduciary Duty? appeared first on Law Firm Carolinas.

How They Work Together and When They Need Updating Every community association–whether a homeowners association (HOA) or condominium–operates under a set of governing documents. Together, these documents define how the community functions, what owners may or may not do, and how decisions are made. Although most owners are familiar with the “rules,” few realize how those rules fit into a hierarchy of authority or how and when those documents should be updated. Declaration of Covenants The Declaration (sometimes called the “Covenants,” “CCRs,” or “Restrictions”) is the document filed with the county that created the community association. It is a contract … Continue reading →

The post The Four Governing Documents That Shape Every HOA and Condo appeared first on Law Firm Carolinas.

Every board, committee, or membership meeting eventually faces “problem members.” They may be disruptive by design or simply enthusiastic to a fault. Fortunately, presiding officers have proven tools—parliamentary and personal—for steering meetings back on track. The Over-Participator Some members feel compelled to speak on every issue, often multiple times. If your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised or The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure, rules can help balance participation: In smaller boards or informal settings, the chair can still enforce balance by inviting comments from those who haven’t spoken. If necessary, the chair should act as a … Continue reading →

The post Dealing with Difficult Members at Meetings appeared first on Law Firm Carolinas.

If you haven’t been involved with the National Education Association (NEA) or a state affiliate, the title of this article might seem odd. But for decades, there’s been a practice where delegates at the national Representative Assembly or state conventions move to “reconsider all new business items” or “reconsider all items voted on until now.” This motion doesn’t actually intend to reopen every past decision. Instead, it takes advantage of a feature of the motion to Reconsider in Robert’s Rules of Order (12th Edition). That motion allows an assembly to revisit a single motion if someone believes a mistake was … Continue reading →

The post It’s Time to Reconsider the Motion “to Reconsider Everything” appeared first on Law Firm Carolinas.

Jonathon Woodruff has been named a partner at Law Firm Carolinas, which has five offices in North and South Carolina. A graduate of North Carolina Central University and Campbell University School of Law, Jonathon has experience in both civil and criminal law. He now focuses on representing community associations (HOAs and condominium associations) and supervises the firm’s association assessment collections practice. Congratulations, Jonathon!

The post appeared first on Law Firm Carolinas.

Ranked-choice voting (RCV) is getting a lot of attention lately. One reason is that it helps avoid expensive runoff elections that often have low turnout. Instead of holding another election weeks later, RCV lets voters rank candidates on a single ballot. Many voters feel this is fairer because the winner usually has support from more than just a small group of voters. Cities, counties, and even some states are now using RCV or considering it. Last month New York City used RCV in its Democratic mayoral primary. Voters were able to rank up to five candidates. If no one received … Continue reading →

The post Ranked Choice Voting & Robert’s Rules of Order appeared first on Law Firm Carolinas.

We are frequently asked to assist with either drafting or interpreting codes of conduct for association boards. These requests tend to fall into two categories: creating a code of conduct for a board that does not have one, or advising in situations where a director is alleged to have violated an existing code. We have no objection to well-crafted codes of conduct. A thoughtfully written code of conduct can help set expectations and provides a common basis of appropriate behavior for board members. This is especially helpful for new directors or for individuals who have never served on a board … Continue reading →

The post Board Codes of Conduct & The Consequence of Violations appeared first on Law Firm Carolinas.

Each year, Carole Albright—also an attorney and Professional Registered Parliamentarian—and I attend numerous conventions, annual meetings, and representative assemblies. Lately, we’ve noticed two major changes in these gatherings: members are more engaged at these meetings than ever, and there seems to have been a generational shift in who’s attending. Since the pandemic, many seasoned delegates familiar with parliamentary procedure are no longer present. In their place are newer, often younger members—enthusiastic, but sometimes unfamiliar with the more meeting rules necessary in larger groups following Robert’s Rules of Order (or some version of “Sturgis” or the AIP Standard Code). This shift … Continue reading →

The post Know Before You Go to the Mic: Using Points and Requests Correctly appeared first on Law Firm Carolinas.

At meetings conducted under parliamentary procedure, you may hear references to a “friendly amendment.” Despite how common the term has become, Robert’s Rules of Order barely addresses the concept—and did not mention “friendly amendments” at all until the 10th Edition, published in 2000. The current Robert’s describes a friendly amendment as “an amendment offered by someone who is in sympathy with the purposes of the main motion, in the belief that the amendment will either improve the statement or effect of the main motion, presumably to the satisfaction of its maker, or will increase the chances of the main motion’s … Continue reading →

The post Proper Use of “Friendly Amendments” During Meetings appeared first on Law Firm Carolinas.