Mark Fuller Dillon
Goodreads Author
"Mark Fuller Dillon is an original talent, whose precise use of language, obliquely disturbing imagery and meticulous world building single him out as a writer to watch."
-- Peter Tennant, BLACK STATIC #35.
Hello, and welcome!
Most of my stories are set in the region where I live (Gatineau, Quebec), and are based on some of the stranger moments of my life, or on my nightmares (which have kept my nights lively and loud since I was three years old).
I've had work published in Barbara and Christopher Roden's ALL HALLOWS and in John Pelan's DARKSIDE; I've also had work accepted for anthologies and magazines that faded away before my stories could appear. The best of these are collected in my second ebook, IN A SEASON OF DEAD WEATHER.
ICE AND AUTUMN "Mark Fuller Dillon is an original talent, whose precise use of language, obliquely disturbing imagery and meticulous world building single him out as a writer to watch."
-- Peter Tennant, BLACK STATIC #35.
Hello, and welcome!
Most of my stories are set in the region where I live (Gatineau, Quebec), and are based on some of the stranger moments of my life, or on my nightmares (which have kept my nights lively and loud since I was three years old).
I've had work published in Barbara and Christopher Roden's ALL HALLOWS and in John Pelan's DARKSIDE; I've also had work accepted for anthologies and magazines that faded away before my stories could appear. The best of these are collected in my second ebook, IN A SEASON OF DEAD WEATHER.
ICE AND AUTUMN GLASS, a paperback collection of verses, was published by Leaky Boot Press.
Please don't hesitate to visit my blog, or my Facebook page.
Thank you!
Mark Fuller Dillon ...more
'Will' and 'Shall' Best Fitteth Tamburlaine
Click for a better jpeg.TAMBURLAINE, PART ONE, by Christopher Marlowe (ca 1588): a difficult play to assess, but I do have thoughts about it.
Tamburlaine believes, thoroughly, utterly believes, that he can conquer the world, so he begins. When the ends of his power are served by persuasive oratory and generosity to those who follow him, he shows mercy and clemency. When the ends are served by t
Read more of this blog post »
|
HWA Poetry Showcase Volume II
by
Tausha Johnson (Goodreads Author),
Michelle Scalise (Goodreads Author)
4.19 avg rating — 16 ratings
—
published
2015
—
2 editions
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
At First, You Hear The Silence
4.31 avg rating — 13 ratings
—
published
2016
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
In A Season Of Dead Weather
4.23 avg rating — 13 ratings
—
published
2013
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
All Roads Lead To Winter
4.36 avg rating — 11 ratings
—
published
2013
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
Ice & Autumn Glass
4.50 avg rating — 2 ratings
—
published
2018
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
Doorways Unforeseen
really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 2 ratings
—
published
2024
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
Mark’s Recent Updates
|
Mark Fuller Dillon
rated a book really liked it
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
TAMBURLAINE, PART ONE, by Christopher Marlowe (ca 1588): a difficult play to assess, but I do have thoughts about it. Tamburlaine knows, thoroughly, utterly knows, that he will conquer the world, so he begins. When the ends of his power are served by TAMBURLAINE, PART ONE, by Christopher Marlowe (ca 1588): a difficult play to assess, but I do have thoughts about it. Tamburlaine knows, thoroughly, utterly knows, that he will conquer the world, so he begins. When the ends of his power are served by persuasive oratory and generosity to those who follow him, he shows mercy and clemency. When the ends are served by the slaughter of innocents and the brutal humiliation of his opponents, he mows down entire populations without a second thought, and treats human beings as furniture, as caged amusements. The man seems more a drive to conquest than a human being, and this makes the play disturbing. For this reason, the play is less about plot than about iron pageantry: a tapestry of murders, victories, humiliations dished out by a symbol of power with few human characteristics. Yet the play does does offer moments of unexpected sympathy for those caught up in Tamburlaine's path: in the fate of Bajazeth and Zabina, emperor and empress of the Turks, brutally mistreated like caged animals until they show surprising depths of love for each other; in the final words of Arabia's king, whose intended bride, Zenocrate, was captured for marriage by Tamburlaine, and who, at the moment of his death, reveals himself to have been a good man sincerely devoted to the woman who should have been his; and in the second thoughts, the hesitations, of Zenocrate herself, the one person close to Tamburlaine who argues for mercy and against mass murder. These brief glimpses of humanity stand out all the more as a contrast to the single-minded will of Tamburlaine. The result is a troubling, repetitive play that lacks the layered characters of Shakespeare, Webster, Ford. What it offers, instead, from beginning to end, is brilliant language: the first great poetry of Elizabethan drama. Quote one passage, and you might be tempted to quote them all.
For all of its great poetry and stark moments of humane feeling, TAMBURLAINE, PART ONE is hardly a great play, but its place in the history of world theatre and its nagging persistence in the mind after its pages have been closed make it worth celebration. ...more |
|
|
Mark Fuller Dillon
rated a book did not like it
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
Because I read more poetry than any sane man should, I often run into collections that have been overlooked, forgotten, tossed aside unfairly. THE BARCAROLE OF JAMES SMITH, by Herbert S. Gorman; COLLECTED POEMS, by Robert Gittings; POEMS, by Iris Tre
Because I read more poetry than any sane man should, I often run into collections that have been overlooked, forgotten, tossed aside unfairly. THE BARCAROLE OF JAMES SMITH, by Herbert S. Gorman; COLLECTED POEMS, by Robert Gittings; POEMS, by Iris Tree; COLLECTED POEMS, by Elinor Wylie; POEMS, by Nora May French: these merit rediscovery and a reader's full attention. On the other hand, I also uncover the stench of books dead before they were published, books that make the doggerel of WEIRD TALES and FAMOUS FANTASTIC MYSTERIES look halfway competent, books erased by the protective amnesia of readers everywhere. NIGHT, by Harold Brainerd Hersey, with its Hallmark greeting-card echoes of Baudelaire; THE BATTLE FIENDS, proof that MEDUSA was not the only mindlessly wretched book by E. H. Visiak; and most recently, THE SHADOW-EATER, by Benjamin De Casseres (Wilmarth Publishing Company, New York, 1917). Beyond its plodding ineptitude, what makes THE SHADOW-EATER disappointing is the connections of its writer with George Sterling and H. L. Mencken. By the evidence here, they taught de Casseres nothing. And nothing is what de Casseres offers. I can smell hints of half-digested Nietzsche, hear long drawling echoes of Whitman, but otherwise, nothing. No vivid metaphors, no living imagery, no compelling rhythms or sounds, no technical self-discipline, nothing that might stand out beyond a small-town newspaper's editorial page. There is nothing poetic in his capitalized Abstract NOUNS, in his repeated phrases ("In ITS night, in ITS night!"), in his odes to Nothing. While Leconte de Lisle sang brilliantly of the abyss, de Casseres is merely abysmal. I have nothing more to say about this nothing. Instead, I leave you with examples of de Casseres in his nakedness. ===== THE ROTTED IDEAL Framed in ebon memories her picture hangs there upon the walls of my brain. 'Tis not the face I put there in my youth: that glorious youth of me, slain by its lusts, bitten to death by the baby vampires that swarmed in its blood. The lost woman of my soul! warm lips, black eyes -- face that was a prism of love shot through by the rays from some dumb despair -- Long has it vanished. And the dust of my acts have gathered on that brow, and my sins have smitten her cheeks to a pallor, and her eyes welter in two brackish tears -- Tears that have lain stagnant in those bony cups for a myriad soul-cycles. I have wrought my own decay into that face: it has traveled the way of my own dissolution. Will it break on my brain-walls and streak all my rottenness anew? And a spider has woven a web over and around the great frame of ebon and the thin bladder of flesh that once was her face -- A leering, grinning spider has woven his web there, A leering, grinning spider whose mouth sucks poison from her lips. Lead on, hell-lights! ===== THE DEAD WHO LIVE Up from the nether world in unending procession, Like the lurid mists at the dawn-time, Like the black wraiths that ascend from foul crypts, Arise and ever arise my impulses. Across the field of consciousness they stalk, anhungered, lust-ravened, lean of their ghastly dreams -- Thou devils of the gone-by! ===== THE GOD OF NEGATION I have ascended to the topmost spaces and dragged the cars of the devildare gods from their courses; They saw me not, but felt me as a Presence that hurled them from the track. I have in a wondrous Thought undermined the Milky Way and have sown the orbits of the suns with dragons' teeth uprooted from my rebellious soul: Those eyes of gleaming fire saw me not, but felt me as a movement in the Abyss. I have numbed the arm of the blind old Artisan, and he shall die at my last Epiphany: He heard me not, but felt me as the great Destructive Presence. ==== DE PROFUNDIS Night! Night! Eternal Night, whose black vapors have filled all the sluiceways of Time -- Night! ageless and void, seamless and bald: Night upgurgling from chaos, upswirl of the noumenal seas, drape me and veil me from the illusory lights of this world! My being's at nadir, I pass into my solstice, I have touched of ITS garment, the black thing IT weaves on ITS sentient looms, ITS great blouse of black which encircles the world fold upon fold -- While we crawl in ITS creases and guess. Sit I in the night of ITS sleeve, Withering into eternities, Bowed in ITS night, in ITS night! ===== THE SYNCOPATED SPINNER Yon drowsing Spider that squats there upon Time's rotting timbers spinning her seven webs of a million threads, spinning and weaving from the birth of the Primitive Cycle -- Her criss-crosses, her mazes and labyrinths that are called Eternal Laws by the midges caught in the films Spun by that drowsing Spider squat there upon Time's rotting timbers: Awake! thou great spinning demon, shake webs and midge-men into the Nothing, and with the shade of a smirk that I know resume thy loathsome pastime There squat upon Time's rotting timbers! ===== THE SLEEPER My soul fell asleep, asleep in a great city, among the leering faces of her millions; The iron hoofs of many strange and monstrous animals ground their imprint in my prescient white Self that lay stark and helpless on the highways of the world: O my Soul, my Soul, awake thou! The waves have gone over me and crawling things with fiery eyes have wriggled onto the white throne where I ruled, And the old seven deadly delights have kissed me each one and licked up my strength with their smooth yellow tongues: O my Soul, my Soul, awake thou! O the terror of sleep and of Me who am blotted, erased and spun into things that are vile and grosser than compost, And the long death of Me that drank of this hemlock of earth that brings not the death that is surcease -- only a death of vile dreaming, a lapsing without a forgetting: O my Soul, my Soul, awake thou! Out of their crypts stalk my elder old selves, and whilst I stare with the impotent eye set in the head of the dead they drive in the little brass rivets of habit to the core of my being: O my Soul, my Soul, awake thou! ...more |
|
|
Mark Fuller Dillon
rated a book liked it
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
Back in the 1980s, I considered "Fengriffen" a good story buried in pastiche. Reading it again today, I feel the same response. I also have to wonder how many people stared at the first line, winced, and then tossed the book aside: My first impressionBack in the 1980s, I considered "Fengriffen" a good story buried in pastiche. Reading it again today, I feel the same response. I also have to wonder how many people stared at the first line, winced, and then tossed the book aside: My first impression of Fengriffen House was skeletal. Not content to give such a skeletal impression of his writing skill, David Case goes on to mangle another modifier: I saw it from the carriage, rising against a stormy sundown like the blackened bones of some monstrous beast.... A first paragraph is the gateway into reading; this one is rusted and barely squeaks open, but after a few more the writing improves: I looked at the moors and I smoked. When my pipe burned out I filled a second, lighted it, tamped it down carefully, and fired it again until it was burning evenly and the smoke was cool. Tobacco is an ally of contentment, and I told myself I must be content with the cheerful blaze still in the grate and the wind howling ineffectively outside, shaking the trees in a fury but unable to get to me -- indeed, defeating its purpose as in rage it sucked the draught up the chimney and caused my fire to burn more freely. I was able to judge the force of that wind by regarding the shadows beneath the trees. The filigreed moonlight shifted and blurred, laying silver tapestries beneath the limbs. It was hypnotic. I lost awareness of time as I studied the moving shadows. My second pipe went out. I pulled thoughtlessly at the mouthpiece. My eyes grew heavy. Then, gradually, I found myself looking at a different shadow. I must have observed it for some time before I realized it was more than the wind snatching the trees. For this shape had advanced beyond the trees, bringing a shadow of its own; it moved near to the house and then paused. I snapped to alertness. I stared at this dark form and had the grotesque impression that, whatever it was, it was staring back at me. A finger of ice tapped up the articulation of my backbone, leaving me rigid in its wake. Too many present participles, but otherwise, not bad at all. The story moves quickly, piles on details and complications with skill, holds the attention at all times. As a narrative, "Fengriffen" brings more than enough to make reading worthwhile, if you can accept the anonymity of pastiche. For me, it represents a dead end. I see no value in mimicking the writers of yesterday; I prefer those writers who have learned from the past, who have digested its methods to bring us ideas and obsessions of their own. The past is a guide, but should not be a limiting template. As templated stories go, "Fengriffen" is one of the best. I can only wish that Case had used the tale to share private fears and personal images, to make the story his own. ...more |
|
|
Jun 20, 2026 11:16PM
· like
· see review ·
preview book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help.
Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of
Fengriffen & Other Gothic Tales by David Case.
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Not the book you’re looking for?
Preview — Fengriffen & Other Gothic Tales by David Case |
|
|
Mark Fuller Dillon
rated a book liked it
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
Back in the 1980s, I considered "Fengriffen" a good story buried in pastiche. Reading it again today, I feel the same response. I also have to wonder how many people stared at the first line, winced, and then tossed the book aside: My first impressionBack in the 1980s, I considered "Fengriffen" a good story buried in pastiche. Reading it again today, I feel the same response. I also have to wonder how many people stared at the first line, winced, and then tossed the book aside: My first impression of Fengriffen House was skeletal. Not content to give such a skeletal impression of his writing skill, David Case goes on to mangle another modifier: I saw it from the carriage, rising against a stormy sundown like the blackened bones of some monstrous beast.... A first paragraph is the gateway into reading; this one is rusted and barely squeaks open, but after a few more the writing improves: I looked at the moors and I smoked. When my pipe burned out I filled a second, lighted it, tamped it down carefully, and fired it again until it was burning evenly and the smoke was cool. Tobacco is an ally of contentment, and I told myself I must be content with the cheerful blaze still in the grate and the wind howling ineffectively outside, shaking the trees in a fury but unable to get to me -- indeed, defeating its purpose as in rage it sucked the draught up the chimney and caused my fire to burn more freely. I was able to judge the force of that wind by regarding the shadows beneath the trees. The filigreed moonlight shifted and blurred, laying silver tapestries beneath the limbs. It was hypnotic. I lost awareness of time as I studied the moving shadows. My second pipe went out. I pulled thoughtlessly at the mouthpiece. My eyes grew heavy. Then, gradually, I found myself looking at a different shadow. I must have observed it for some time before I realized it was more than the wind snatching the trees. For this shape had advanced beyond the trees, bringing a shadow of its own; it moved near to the house and then paused. I snapped to alertness. I stared at this dark form and had the grotesque impression that, whatever it was, it was staring back at me. A finger of ice tapped up the articulation of my backbone, leaving me rigid in its wake. Too many present participles, but otherwise, not bad at all. The story moves quickly, piles on details and complications with skill, holds the attention at all times. As a narrative, "Fengriffen" brings more than enough to make reading worthwhile, if you can accept the anonymity of pastiche. For me, it represents a dead end. I see no value in mimicking the writers of yesterday; I prefer those writers who have learned from the past, who have digested its methods to bring us ideas and obsessions of their own. The past is a guide, but should not be a limiting template. As templated stories go, "Fengriffen" is one of the best. I can only wish that Case had used the tale to share private fears and personal images, to make the story his own. ...more |
|
|
Mark Fuller Dillon
rated a book really liked it
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
John Ford, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE (1633). By critical consensus, the plays of John Ford represent either a last echo of popular Jacobean theatre, or early examples of a Caroline theatre designed not for the crowds, but for private viewings in palaces John Ford, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE (1633). By critical consensus, the plays of John Ford represent either a last echo of popular Jacobean theatre, or early examples of a Caroline theatre designed not for the crowds, but for private viewings in palaces or in houses of the wealthy. Whatever the label, most critics agree that by this time, the vitality, the broad appeal of Elizabethan-Jacobean tragedy was dead, that Ford was one of the few interesting writers of this period who retained something of Jacobean vigour, and that his most interesting, most lively play, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE, remains one of the best from its period. I would call it a hand grenade, to be handled carefully at the risk of losing several fingers or an eye. One reason for caution: the play's topic.
Like many teenagers before and since, Giovanni knows that he knows everything, and that his will, his desires, transcend social norms and accepted customs.
What Giovanni ignores is the weight of the world's countering opinion.
Luckily (or unluckily) for Giovanni, his beloved sister is more than willing to love him back. For Annabella, the long line of suitors eager to win her hand might as well not exist; her one true love is her brother.
The first unsettling aspect of this play is the implication that these lovers are indeed sincere. Despite the hardships that eat away at their secret union, they remain devoted and loyal to each other. The second unsettling detail is the brutal ferocity of the other characters towards Annabella. Like the enemies of the Duchess in John Webster's THE DUCHESS OF MALFI, these men seem to resent her mainly because she openly, honestly, and courteously follows her own path. Circumstances are complicated (perhaps over-complicated) by plotters in disguise, by daily betrayals, by feuds between the suitors, but in all of this, Annabella, despite her incest, comes across as the better human being. Yet as we know, history is written by the victors. The final judgement of the victors in this play is that Annabella was a despicable whore, which ignores her actions and her personality. Whether this harsh assessment of her character was also John Ford's remains impossible to tell, but much of the lingering bitterness of this play comes from the unfairness, the cruelty of the men. If Annabella seems more innocent, more pure than the men around her, Giovanni carries the weight of a more complex mind. At the play's end, he becomes a full revenger against those who persecute his sister, yet his own "solution" to the challenge of his love is just as brutal as theirs. The play foreshadows this end in many lines, but it remains horrific. For some readers, this might seem over the top, but in the traditions of Elizabethan-Jacobean tragedy, the spectacle of gore fits right in. While John Ford shares with Webster and Shakespeare this passion for bloodshed, he lacks their genius for metaphors and imagery. Instead, he offers a smoothly elegant dramatic language that brings pleasures of its own.
What we have, then, is a play of elegant poetry, undeniable power, and an overwhelming bitterness. Readers will respond as they will; for my part, I admire the play even as I wince at the sting of its venom. ...more |
|
|
Mark Fuller Dillon
rated a book really liked it
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
John Ford, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE (1633). By critical consensus, the plays of John Ford represent either a last echo of popular Jacobean theatre, or early examples of a Caroline theatre designed not for the crowds, but for private viewings in palaces John Ford, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE (1633). By critical consensus, the plays of John Ford represent either a last echo of popular Jacobean theatre, or early examples of a Caroline theatre designed not for the crowds, but for private viewings in palaces or in houses of the wealthy. Whatever the label, most critics agree that by this time, the vitality, the broad appeal of Elizabethan-Jacobean tragedy was dead, that Ford was one of the few interesting writers of this period who retained something of Jacobean vigour, and that his most interesting, most lively play, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE, remains one of the best from its period. I would call it a hand grenade, to be handled carefully at the risk of losing several fingers or an eye. One reason for caution: the play's topic.
Like many teenagers before and since, Giovanni knows that he knows everything, and that his will, his desires, transcend social norms and accepted customs.
What Giovanni ignores is the weight of the world's countering opinion.
Luckily (or unluckily) for Giovanni, his beloved sister is more than willing to love him back. For Annabella, the long line of suitors eager to win her hand might as well not exist; her one true love is her brother.
The first unsettling aspect of this play is the implication that these lovers are indeed sincere. Despite the hardships that eat away at their secret union, they remain devoted and loyal to each other. The second unsettling detail is the brutal ferocity of the other characters towards Annabella. Like the enemies of the Duchess in John Webster's THE DUCHESS OF MALFI, these men seem to resent her mainly because she openly, honestly, and courteously follows her own path. Circumstances are complicated (perhaps over-complicated) by plotters in disguise, by daily betrayals, by feuds between the suitors, but in all of this, Annabella, despite her incest, comes across as the better human being. Yet as we know, history is written by the victors. The final judgement of the victors in this play is that Annabella was a despicable whore, which ignores her actions and her personality. Whether this harsh assessment of her character was also John Ford's remains impossible to tell, but much of the lingering bitterness of this play comes from the unfairness, the cruelty of the men. If Annabella seems more innocent, more pure than the men around her, Giovanni carries the weight of a more complex mind. At the play's end, he becomes a full revenger against those who persecute his sister, yet his own "solution" to the challenge of his love is just as brutal as theirs. The play foreshadows this end in many lines, but it remains horrific. For some readers, this might seem over the top, but in the traditions of Elizabethan-Jacobean tragedy, the spectacle of gore fits right in. While John Ford shares with Webster and Shakespeare this passion for bloodshed, he lacks their genius for metaphors and imagery. Instead, he offers a smoothly elegant dramatic language that brings pleasures of its own.
What we have, then, is a play of elegant poetry, undeniable power, and an overwhelming bitterness. Readers will respond as they will; for my part, I admire the play even as I wince at the sting of its venom. ...more |
|
|
Jun 10, 2026 07:53AM
· like
· see review ·
preview book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help.
Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of
Four Revenge Tragedies by Thomas Kyd.
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Not the book you’re looking for?
Preview — Four Revenge Tragedies by Thomas Kyd |
|
|
Mark Fuller Dillon
rated a book really liked it
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
THE WHITE DEVIL revisited. As a Jacobean-mad teenager forty-five years ago, I read John Webster's THE WHITE DEVIL for the first time. I applauded its brilliance, but I also wanted to take a hot, soapy shower to wash away the grease of all that evil. THE WHITE DEVIL revisited. As a Jacobean-mad teenager forty-five years ago, I read John Webster's THE WHITE DEVIL for the first time. I applauded its brilliance, but I also wanted to take a hot, soapy shower to wash away the grease of all that evil.
Above all, in the world of THE WHITE DEVIL, power counts for everything, people count for nothing.
A world of power is a world of horrors.
Yet reading this play again -- for what, the fourth time? The fifth? -- I caught a hint of grey light in its darkness. There is goodness in this world, even if much of it endures in resigned sadness.
Yet along with resignation comes defiance, in particular, the courageous defiance of women. This hits a peak during Act 3, Scene 2, with an arraignment of the heroine, Vittoria, whose only crime is that men want her. She will not be cowed by accusations: instead, she argues back, brilliantly, and gains approval from the court's witnesses.
Her defiance, and the defiance of certain women around her, never fades, not even at the end.
In THE WHITE DEVIL, defiance often snarls with bared fangs, but it remains courage, and as a light against the darkness, admirable. Darkness obscured the critical consensus on Webster for decades. Even after Shakespeare had been revisited and rehabilitated from his long neglect by British and German Romantics, Webster was hobbled with the reputation of Horror Sensationalist until the end of the 19th Century, when critics like Swinburne and John Addington Symonds came forward to defend him. His rehabilitation continued in the 20th Century, thanks to critics like Rupert Brooke and F. L. Lucas. They pointed out what should have been obvious right from the start: John Webster was not only a great poet, but a great dramatist. A great poet, a great dramatist. Marlowe was a great poet, but not exactly a good dramatist. Chapman could write beautifully, but dramatically, his plays, especially BUSSY D'AMBOIS, were unconvincing, inconsistent messes. Ford was often fine as a dramatist, and as a poet, often very fine. Above all, however, as dramatist and poet, stood William Shakespeare, and along with him, John Webster. Webster's poetry differed from Shakespeare's in its precision. Shakespeare seems to have thought in metaphors, and he rarely used one or two when he could use twelve or fifteen; Webster showed more constraint, which enhanced the power of those metaphors he carefully chose. Webster's drama differed from Shakespeare's in its range of people and emotions. While Shakespeare understood all kinds of people, and covered a vast emotional range, Webster focused on angry, bitter people, ignored, passed by, denied promotion and money despite their qualities. It would not be exaggeration to call Webster a Poet Of Resentment. Yet as THE WHITE DEVIL makes clear, he was also a Poet Of Defiance.
For John Webster, defiance represents courage: a daylight strength against a world of brutal midnight power. ============== John Ford, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE (1633). By critical consensus, the plays of John Ford represent either a last echo of popular Jacobean theatre, or early examples of a Caroline theatre designed not for the crowds, but for private viewings in palaces or in houses of the wealthy. Whatever the label, most critics agree that by this time, the vitality, the broad appeal of Elizabethan-Jacobean tragedy was dead, that Ford was one of the few interesting writers of this period who retained something of Jacobean vigour, and that his most interesting, most lively play, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE, remains one of the best from its period. I would call it a hand grenade, to be handled carefully at the risk of losing several fingers or an eye. One reason for caution: the play's topic.
Like many teenagers before and since, Giovanni knows that he knows everything, and that his will, his desires, transcend social norms and accepted customs.
What Giovanni ignores is the weight of the world's countering opinion.
Luckily (or unluckily) for Giovanni, his beloved sister is more than willing to love him back. For Annabella, the long line of suitors eager to win her hand might as well not exist; her one true love is her brother.
The first unsettling aspect of this play is the implication that these lovers are indeed sincere. Despite the hardships that eat away at their secret union, they remain devoted and loyal to each other. The second unsettling detail is the brutal ferocity of the other characters towards Annabella. Like the enemies of the Duchess in John Webster's THE DUCHESS OF MALFI, these men seem to resent her mainly because she openly, honestly, and courteously follows her own path. Circumstances are complicated (perhaps over-complicated) by plotters in disguise, by daily betrayals, by feuds between the suitors, but in all of this, Annabella, despite her incest, comes across as the better human being. Yet as we know, history is written by the victors. The final judgement of the victors in this play is that Annabella was a despicable whore, which ignores her actions and her personality. Whether this harsh assessment of her character was also John Ford's remains impossible to tell, but much of the lingering bitterness of this play comes from the unfairness, the cruelty of the men. If Annabella seems more innocent, more pure than the men around her, Giovanni carries the weight of a more complex mind. At the play's end, he becomes a full revenger against those who persecute his sister, yet his own "solution" to the challenge of his love is just as brutal as theirs. The play foreshadows this end in many lines, but it remains horrific. For some readers, this might seem over the top, but in the traditions of Elizabethan-Jacobean tragedy, the spectacle of gore fits right in. While John Ford shares with Webster and Shakespeare this passion for bloodshed, he lacks their genius for metaphors and imagery. Instead, he offers a smoothly elegant dramatic language that brings pleasures of its own.
What we have, then, is a play of elegant poetry, undeniable power, and an overwhelming bitterness. Readers will respond as they will; for my part, I admire the play even as I wince at the sting of its venom. ...more |
|
|
Mark Fuller Dillon
rated a book really liked it
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
John Ford, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE (1633). By critical consensus, the plays of John Ford represent either a last echo of popular Jacobean theatre, or early examples of a Caroline theatre designed not for the crowds, but for private viewings in palaces John Ford, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE (1633). By critical consensus, the plays of John Ford represent either a last echo of popular Jacobean theatre, or early examples of a Caroline theatre designed not for the crowds, but for private viewings in palaces or in houses of the wealthy. Whatever the label, most critics agree that by this time, the vitality, the broad appeal of Elizabethan-Jacobean tragedy was dead, that Ford was one of the few interesting writers of this period who retained something of Jacobean vigour, and that his most interesting, most lively play, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE, remains one of the best from its period. I would call it a hand grenade, to be handled carefully at the risk of losing several fingers or an eye. One reason for caution: the play's topic.
Like many teenagers before and since, Giovanni knows that he knows everything, and that his will, his desires, transcend social norms and accepted customs.
What Giovanni ignores is the weight of the world's countering opinion.
Luckily (or unluckily) for Giovanni, his beloved sister is more than willing to love him back. For Annabella, the long line of suitors eager to win her hand might as well not exist; her one true love is her brother.
The first unsettling aspect of this play is the implication that these lovers are indeed sincere. Despite the hardships that eat away at their secret union, they remain devoted and loyal to each other. The second unsettling detail is the brutal ferocity of the other characters towards Annabella. Like the enemies of the Duchess in John Webster's THE DUCHESS OF MALFI, these men seem to resent her mainly because she openly, honestly, and courteously follows her own path. Circumstances are complicated (perhaps over-complicated) by plotters in disguise, by daily betrayals, by feuds between the suitors, but in all of this, Annabella, despite her incest, comes across as the better human being. Yet as we know, history is written by the victors. The final judgement of the victors in this play is that Annabella was a despicable whore, which ignores her actions and her personality. Whether this harsh assessment of her character was also John Ford's remains impossible to tell, but much of the lingering bitterness of this play comes from the unfairness, the cruelty of the men. If Annabella seems more innocent, more pure than the men around her, Giovanni carries the weight of a more complex mind. At the play's end, he becomes a full revenger against those who persecute his sister, yet his own "solution" to the challenge of his love is just as brutal as theirs. The play foreshadows this end in many lines, but it remains horrific. For some readers, this might seem over the top, but in the traditions of Elizabethan-Jacobean tragedy, the spectacle of gore fits right in. While John Ford shares with Webster and Shakespeare this passion for bloodshed, he lacks their genius for metaphors and imagery. Instead, he offers a smoothly elegant dramatic language that brings pleasures of its own.
What we have, then, is a play of elegant poetry, undeniable power, and an overwhelming bitterness. Readers will respond as they will; for my part, I admire the play even as I wince at the sting of its venom. ...more |
|
|
Mark Fuller Dillon
rated a book really liked it
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
By critical consensus, the plays of John Ford represent either a last echo of popular Jacobean theatre, or early examples of a Caroline theatre designed not for the crowds, but for private viewings in palaces or in houses of the wealthy. Whatever the By critical consensus, the plays of John Ford represent either a last echo of popular Jacobean theatre, or early examples of a Caroline theatre designed not for the crowds, but for private viewings in palaces or in houses of the wealthy. Whatever the label, most critics agree that by this time, the vitality, the broad appeal of Elizabethan-Jacobean tragedy was dead, that Ford was one of the few interesting writers of this period who retained something of Jacobean vigour, and that his most interesting, most lively play, 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE, remains one of the best from its period. I would call it a hand grenade, to be handled carefully at the risk of losing several fingers or an eye. One reason for caution: the play's topic.
Like many teenagers before and since, Giovanni knows that he knows everything, and that his will, his desires, transcend social norms and accepted customs.
What Giovanni ignores is the weight of the world's countering opinion.
Luckily (or unluckily) for Giovanni, his beloved sister is more than willing to love him back. For Annabella, the long line of suitors eager to win her hand might as well not exist; her one true love is her brother.
The first unsettling aspect of this play is the implication that these lovers are indeed sincere. Despite the hardships that eat away at their secret union, they remain devoted and loyal to each other. The second unsettling detail is the brutal ferocity of the other characters towards Annabella. Like the enemies of the Duchess in John Webster's THE DUCHESS OF MALFI, these men seem to resent her mainly because she openly, honestly, and courteously follows her own path. Circumstances are complicated (perhaps over-complicated) by plotters in disguise, by daily betrayals, by feuds between the suitors, but in all of this, Annabella, despite her incest, comes across as the better human being. Yet as we know, history is written by the victors. The final judgement of the victors in this play is that Annabella was a despicable whore, which ignores her actions and her personality. Whether this harsh assessment of her character was also John Ford's remains impossible to tell, but much of the lingering bitterness of this play comes from the unfairness, the cruelty of the men. If Annabella seems more innocent, more pure than the men around her, Giovanni carries the weight of a more complex mind. At the play's end, he becomes a full revenger against those who persecute his sister, yet his own "solution" to the challenge of his love is just as brutal as theirs. The play foreshadows this end in many lines, but it remains horrific. For some readers, this might seem over the top, but in the traditions of Elizabethan-Jacobean tragedy, the spectacle of gore fits right in. While John Ford shares with Webster and Shakespeare this passion for bloodshed, he lacks their genius for metaphors and imagery. Instead, he offers a smoothly elegant dramatic language that brings pleasures of its own.
What we have, then, is a play of elegant poetry, undeniable power, and an overwhelming bitterness. Readers will respond as they will; for my part, I admire the play even as I wince at the sting of its venom. ...more |
|
|
Jun 10, 2026 07:47AM
· like
· see review ·
preview book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help.
Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of
'Tis Pity She's a Whore by John Ford.
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Not the book you’re looking for?
Preview — 'Tis Pity She's a Whore by John Ford |
|
|
Mark Fuller Dillon
rated a book it was ok
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
In 1986, I read William Sloane's THE CRAFT OF WRITING, a small book that made a big change in how I thought about fiction. My own stories improved substantially afterwards, and for this reason, I owe a debt to William Sloane that I could never repay.
In 1986, I read William Sloane's THE CRAFT OF WRITING, a small book that made a big change in how I thought about fiction. My own stories improved substantially afterwards, and for this reason, I owe a debt to William Sloane that I could never repay. I wanted to love THE EDGE OF RUNNING WATER. I wanted to find echoes and reflections of the good advice he had offered in THE CRAFT OF WRITING. I wanted to find a book that I could praise. What I found, instead, was a tediously padded waste of time that made me want to bash my head against the wall. This book begins with a hint of cosmic horror: "A year ago it would have seemed to me ridiculous to assume that there are some facts it is better not to know, and even today I do not believe in the bliss of ignorance or the folly of knowledge. But this one thing is best left untouched. It rips the fabric of human existence from throat to hem and leaves us naked to a wind as cold as the space between the stars." Yet the book also hints right away that it will find no reason to tell its tale with urgency or energy. The protagonist arrives by train. He takes a long taxi trip to a distant house. He talks at length with one person. He talks at length with a second person. He talks at length with a third. Then he takes a swim. Then he has lunch. Then he talks at length again, and again, and again. Every now and then, Sloane reveals a skill with prose: "I watched the flash and lift of her arm as it came out of the water, and the arc of ripples that pushed along in front of her bathing cap. The sun caught the wet rubber and made a point of fire on it. I found myself matching my strokes to hers, so that we were swimming beside each other in the same rhythm, sliding through the water like parts of a single entity. The patch of fire on her cap held my eyes until I was half hypnotized without knowing it, and only the grating of my fingers on the beach sand snapped the spell. But for the most part, he relies on endless passages of dialogue, on delaying tactics of introspection. The protagonist never does anything until he has thought and thought and thought about the appropriate actions. "It should have occurred to me that, even in despair, Julian would be a hard man to fool and that Mrs. Walters must have shown him evidence of something more important than occasional flashes of telepathy. If I had thought about that for a while, tried to imagine what she had been able to do which would interest him, I might have caught a glimpse of what was likely to happen. Instead, the problem presented itself to me in a completely irrelevant light -- the question of what I ought to do about Julian. Not since my last broken attempt to read something by Stephen King have I suffered through a book so tediously determined to pad things out, to repeat information needlessly, to delay gratification, to dispel urgency, and to break any mood of tension with pointless digressions. As the book neared its climax, I hoped that its pacing and focus would improve, but no such luck. Endless introspection! "In the end I had to give up the effort to discover what I thought was wrong. There were too many possibilities and nothing probable. The accident, when I thought about it, did not seem to explain the feeling wholly, though I admitted to myself that when I had seen Mrs. Marcy lying in that unnatural way at the foot of the stairs I had thought for one instant, 'Now it's happened.' But that was obviously meaningless. As it turned out, nothing had happened. And equally, if the accident had been important in some way, I could not see why or to whom -- except Mrs. Marcy -- it was important. What the 'it' was that had happened I did not understand, though I assigned it to the feeling of imminence which had come over me earlier in the afternoon. That, in turn, was unquestionably caused by the approach of the thunderstorm. Still, the lightning and thunder, and most of the rain, had long ago swept away to the northeast and it seemed to me that the air was as charged with suspense as ever. Suspense, I reminded myself, is a purely subjective matter. There was no way of telling whether the way I felt had any external foundation or not." Endless irrelevance! "The rain was still falling, but not in gusts and torrents. It looked as though it might stop in half an hour or so, but it was still coming down fast enough to make me sprint for the battered Ford sedan in which Anne was sitting. Maine mud and dust were plastered all over it, but the motor sounded smooth under the hood. Even before my door was closed Anne was wrenching the car around and stepping it up from gear to gear. As we straightened out into the road the machine slewed sickeningly and I perceived that this was going to be quite a ride. The storm had soaked the loose top dirt of the track and turned it into a slimy lubricant between our wheels and the underlying hardpan. We skidded at every rut. I quote at length to give you some idea of just how painfully dull this book turned out to be. As for the concept behind the story: so what? Who cares? The idea had potential, but Sloane was too determined to keep it out of sight and at arm's length, too hell-bent on padding his idea with pounds of irrelevancy, until I wanted nothing more than for the book to die. Only one thing forced me to read to the end: my debt to William Sloane for THE CRAFT OF WRITING. Anyone else would have driven me out of this book within twenty pages. Oddly enough, in 1941, THE EDGE OF RUNNING WATER was filmed. Like the book that inspired it, THE DEVIL COMMANDS is dull, with an abrupt and unremarkable ending, but unlike the book, it shows hints of competence. The acting is not bad. The cinematography and lighting are often atmospheric, with darkness and shadows that could easily compare with Hollywood "noir" films from later that decade. Yet on the whole, the film is remembered for two good reasons: for the performance of Boris Karloff, who moves convincingly from likeable scientific genius to sullen, broken widower, and for the machine that he builds in a secret laboratory. This machine appears in the book, but the film adds a few macabre details that take it far beyond Sloane's conception. It becomes bizarre enough, and unsettling enough, to stick in the mind long after the film has ended. I will most likely never watch the film again from start to finish, but I will certainly go back to that eerie machine. Can I recommend the book? No. Can I recommend the film? With certain reservations, yes. At the very least, the film will chew up less of your time, and cause less cranial damage to your walls. ...more |
|
























