date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
T.M.
(new)
Feb 08, 2017 12:28PM
Very good observations, Karina. Your new story, Discovery, explores "next science" too. Another thing about science fiction, including the Twilight Zone. If you shift the setting from the here and now, you can explore difficult topics without readers/viewers getting defensive. Good and bad. I loved Asimov's Foundation trilogy, but am now horrified by the thought of a small group of super-psychologists directing the fate of galaxies.
reply
|
flag
If i can recomend a writer. I would like to recomend to my friend Manuel Alfonseca. Although their novels have written in spanish. He has translated to English. https://www.goodreads.com/author/show... In case that you want to read it i share the page with yours. Some books are free https://www.kobo.com/us/en/search?que... . I send a greetings to the powerful Vern, I said previously to my friend T.M. Doran i expect soon that your novels arrive to Spain (my country). I would like to read Toward to the Gleam, and his sequel. I shared this article was written by Sandra Miesel in Ignatius Insight http://www.ignatiusinsight.com/featur...
I also read the Vern`s adeventures, of course. I am sharing your aticle Mrs. Fabian in my two twitters account.
I agree with Karina about the three reasons why sometimes science-fiction becomes true. However, we must be careful not to fall into the Hasty Generalization Fallacy: drawing hasty conclusions from incomplete data. It is true that science-fiction writers have got many true predictions about future science. A case in point is Jules Verne's short story "Au xxixe siècle : La journée d’un journaliste américain en 2889" (In the twenty-ninth century: one day in the life of an american journalist in 2889), written in 1889, where most of the scientific advances he includes have already happened, long before he thought (in one hundred years, rather than one thousand).On the other hand, science-fiction writers also fall in tremendous mistakes in their predictions. This includes classic writers, such as Arthur Clarke and Isaac Asimov. The latter, for instance, used to tell the story about his own blunder, when he wrote a book about the use of the slide rule, which was published just after the invention of the hand electronic calculator, that made the slide rule obsolete.
The following post in my popular science blog deals with failed scientific predictions by famous science-fiction writers:
http://populscience.blogspot.com/2015/07/predicting-scientific-future.html
By the way, thanks to Fonch for promoting my own science-fiction:-)
Manuel wrote: "I agree with Karina about the three reasons why sometimes science-fiction becomes true. However, we must be careful not to fall into the Hasty Generalization Fallacy: drawing hasty conclusions from..."It does not matter. Your young adult novels are excellent and my friends Karina Fabian, and T.M. Doran had to know a writer with your talent. A part of being a good writer. Manuel Alfonseca is a wise man, a man who know the science fiction genre, and the best he is a good man. Somebody very valueable, he has a lot of things to tell us. In my case i would like to recomend to Robert Hugh Benson, and Anthony Burgess. I like supporting the science catholic fiction has a lot of things to say.



