Why I Love Writing Science Fiction

One of the best things about being a writer of science fiction and fantasy is that sometimes, science fiction comes true. Communicators and replicators of Star Trek are cell phones and three-D printers of today, for example, but there are scores of different technologies that were imagined or popularized by science fiction writers long before they became practical technologies.

There are three reasons for this. The first is that scientists are often science fiction writers. Isaac Asimov, who wrote Foundations, I Robot and other famous science fiction stories, was a biochemist. More recently, we have Michael Crichton and Travis Taylor, both science fiction writers with science degrees.

Second, science fiction authors, even when not scientists themselves, often study science and think about the applications. For my own stories, like Discovery, I had to study VASIMR drives and spacesuit technology. I then pushed that technology about 150 years into the future, imagining what we could do if untried research came to fruition and widespread use. Other writers (and me, in other stories) push the envelope further, taking wild theories and imagining their applications and consequences, and when no theory is available, creating one in a “What if”?

The final reason – and my favorite – is that scientists are inspired by science fiction. It’s no surprise that the communicator of the 1960s Star Trek became the flip phone of the 80s. The inventor was directly inspired by the design. Many other Star Trek technologies, even the outlandish idea of warp drive, are being studied by scientists today. In print, we can point to Jules Verne, whose story, “Five Weeks in a Balloon” inspired Sikorski to invent the helicopter.

As technology grows, so do writers’ imaginations, and those imaginations spark further growth in science and technology. It’s a wonderful symbiotic relationship that makes me proud to be a science fiction writer.
2 likes ·   •  6 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 08, 2017 06:21 Tags: karina-fabian, science-and-science-fiction, science-fiction-inspiration
Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by T.M. (new)

T.M. Doran Very good observations, Karina. Your new story, Discovery, explores "next science" too. Another thing about science fiction, including the Twilight Zone. If you shift the setting from the here and now, you can explore difficult topics without readers/viewers getting defensive. Good and bad. I loved Asimov's Foundation trilogy, but am now horrified by the thought of a small group of super-psychologists directing the fate of galaxies.


message 2: by Karina (new)

Karina Fabian Thanks so much for commenting. It's been so long since I read Foundation - middle school.


message 3: by Fonch (new)

Fonch If i can recomend a writer. I would like to recomend to my friend Manuel Alfonseca. Although their novels have written in spanish. He has translated to English. https://www.goodreads.com/author/show... In case that you want to read it i share the page with yours. Some books are free https://www.kobo.com/us/en/search?que... . I send a greetings to the powerful Vern, I said previously to my friend T.M. Doran i expect soon that your novels arrive to Spain (my country). I would like to read Toward to the Gleam, and his sequel. I shared this article was written by Sandra Miesel in Ignatius Insight http://www.ignatiusinsight.com/featur...


message 4: by Fonch (new)

Fonch I also read the Vern`s adeventures, of course. I am sharing your aticle Mrs. Fabian in my two twitters account.


message 5: by Manuel (last edited Feb 09, 2017 04:12AM) (new)

Manuel Alfonseca I agree with Karina about the three reasons why sometimes science-fiction becomes true. However, we must be careful not to fall into the Hasty Generalization Fallacy: drawing hasty conclusions from incomplete data. It is true that science-fiction writers have got many true predictions about future science. A case in point is Jules Verne's short story "Au xxixe siècle : La journée d’un journaliste américain en 2889" (In the twenty-ninth century: one day in the life of an american journalist in 2889), written in 1889, where most of the scientific advances he includes have already happened, long before he thought (in one hundred years, rather than one thousand).

On the other hand, science-fiction writers also fall in tremendous mistakes in their predictions. This includes classic writers, such as Arthur Clarke and Isaac Asimov. The latter, for instance, used to tell the story about his own blunder, when he wrote a book about the use of the slide rule, which was published just after the invention of the hand electronic calculator, that made the slide rule obsolete.

The following post in my popular science blog deals with failed scientific predictions by famous science-fiction writers:
http://populscience.blogspot.com/2015/07/predicting-scientific-future.html

By the way, thanks to Fonch for promoting my own science-fiction:-)


message 6: by Fonch (new)

Fonch Manuel wrote: "I agree with Karina about the three reasons why sometimes science-fiction becomes true. However, we must be careful not to fall into the Hasty Generalization Fallacy: drawing hasty conclusions from..."

It does not matter. Your young adult novels are excellent and my friends Karina Fabian, and T.M. Doran had to know a writer with your talent. A part of being a good writer. Manuel Alfonseca is a wise man, a man who know the science fiction genre, and the best he is a good man. Somebody very valueable, he has a lot of things to tell us. In my case i would like to recomend to Robert Hugh Benson, and Anthony Burgess. I like supporting the science catholic fiction has a lot of things to say.


back to top