Fact ferreting

We are at war.

Back in 1977 Paul Johnson, Boris's uncle, published a book called Enemies of Society, in which he castigated all those who made meaningless or unverified statements. They would, he said, destroy the basic certainties societies need to function. The book was written from a right-wing perspective; Johnson was a polemicist. But he was not wrong about this. Hannah Arendt made a similar point, in a very different way, from farther left, in her essay On Lying in Politics. They weren't joking; and now the Internet has arrived in politics in a big way and it ain’t pretty.

It shouldn’t be a surprise. The late Günter Grass foresaw its use by the alt-right back in 2004, in his last novel, Crabwalk, which I reviewed here on Goodreads a day or two after Grass died. He was all too prescient. The Web is heaving with stories from dodgy websites, propagated by social media and reinforced by half-truths from the nastier newspapers. And let’s be clear – while the worst abuses come from the right, the left has had a hand in this as well.

In an era of fake news, half-truths, social-media silos, bent media, etc. etc., I am - how shall I put it? - a fanatical fact ferret. I am sharing some of my ferreting techniques with you. Good luck. The enemies of society are all around you, and this is a war we have to win.

http://mikerobbinsnyc.blogspot.com/20...
9 likes ·   •  13 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 24, 2017 10:28 Tags: alternative-facts, fake-news, internet-research, truth
Comments Showing 1-13 of 13 (13 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Tracy (new)

Tracy Reilly Mike, this is wonderful! In fact, you have given me a great idea for a research project for my students next year--find an example of something accused or suspected of being fake news and prove it true or false.


message 2: by Mike (new)

Mike Robbins Tracy wrote: "Mike, this is wonderful! In fact, you have given me a great idea for a research project for my students next year--find an example of something accused or suspected of being fake news and prove it ..."

What an excellent idea.
What level are your students, Tracy - college/university level?


message 3: by Tracy (new)

Tracy Reilly Mike wrote: "Tracy wrote: "Mike, this is wonderful! In fact, you have given me a great idea for a research project for my students next year--find an example of something accused or suspected of being fake news..."

High School.


message 4: by [deleted user] (new)

Congratulations, Mike. Since this is an issue of the utmost importance, the presentations are being provided by some people very astute in making the "facts" seem to fit their agenda, people who try to offer a "truth," people who make errors, and people who are in different camps at different times.

It is a critical issue and your suggestions go a long way toward solving the puzzles. I suppose the drawback is that many people may not have the time to investigate the claims.

If I might humbly be allowed to make a suggestion; it would be this. First assign priorities. How important to one's thought process is that event? Not much in the news is of anything but momentary entertainment relevance.

Use common sense. Does that sound plausible to you? If not, probably further investigation is warranted. The good people have been taught to defer their opinions to the "experts," many of them already purchased. They shoud be encouraged to put in their uncredentialed two cents.

Just sayin' Mike; as a result of your encompassing and good work.


message 5: by Mike (new)

Mike Robbins Tracy wrote: "Mike wrote: "Tracy wrote: "Mike, this is wonderful! In fact, you have given me a great idea for a research project for my students next year--find an example of something accused or suspected of be..."

Great.
I did a long period of postgraduate study and was often told by the faculty staff that students were arriving unprepared to question things, or to distinguish between sources.


message 6: by Mike (new)

Mike Robbins Who Dat wrote: "Congratulations, Mike. Since this is an issue of the utmost importance, the presentations are being provided by some people very astute in making the "facts" seem to fit their agenda, people who tr..."

The news comes and goes very quickly - but it leaves a residue. Yes it's ephemeral, but the aggregate impressions it leaves on people are not. I believe that it is important to strike back against fake news or distortions whenever you see them.

Within reason; we all get days when we have too much on our minds, and decide it's someone else's turn (yes, you are right about having the time!). But it's not always so difficult once you know where to go - how to do a highly specific Google search very quickly, and where to find official statistics on (say) immigration.


message 7: by Tracy (new)

Tracy Reilly Mike wrote: "Tracy wrote: "Mike wrote: "Tracy wrote: "Mike, this is wonderful! In fact, you have given me a great idea for a research project for my students next year--find an example of something accused or s..."

Well, I work at a honors military boarding school , lots of international students, so it's not the typical American public high school. We try to cram them a bit fuller for college prep, and I know our local public schools don't. They're too busy doing standardized tests to do research projects.


message 8: by Anthony (new)

Anthony Stancomb I did a book review programme for Thames TV on the book with PJ when it came out ( Gosh, I had brown hair then) Great man. I remember him saying that the only guard against being led by the nose by whoever it might be is high standards in journalism. 'It's fact ferreting ' as you put it.
Hope all's well over there.
Anthony


message 9: by Mike (new)

Mike Robbins Tracy wrote: "Mike wrote: "Tracy wrote: "Mike wrote: "Tracy wrote: "Mike, this is wonderful! In fact, you have given me a great idea for a research project for my students next year--find an example of something..."

Standardized tests surely can't confer the ability to think the way a research assignment can.


message 10: by Mike (new)

Mike Robbins Anthony wrote: "I did a book review programme for Thames TV on the book with PJ when it came out ( Gosh, I had brown hair then) Great man. I remember him saying that the only guard against being led by the nose by..."

I had brown hair then too, and plenty of it - it was forty years ago!

I remember the book was promoted then for its alleged union-bashing, which of course the right-wing media loved. But in practice there isn't that much of that in Enemies of Society, as I recall; it is a more interesting book than that. In essence, it's about not talking balderdash, and why it is dangerous to do so. I wonder what Johnson thought of the wonderful Alan Sokal hoax in the 1990s. I wonder, too, what he thinks of this:
https://thewire.in/140900/gender-stud...


message 11: by Tracy (new)

Tracy Reilly Mike wrote: "Tracy wrote: "Mike wrote: "Tracy wrote: "Mike wrote: "Tracy wrote: "Mike, this is wonderful! In fact, you have given me a great idea for a research project for my students next year--find an exampl..."

And it is getting more and more difficult to teach the proper way to debate.


message 12: by Amanda (new)

Amanda Baker Most excellent. I take my hat off even to the idea that someone can be bothered with this. Sometimes fact checking seems like sorting through rotting garbage for an un-blemished apple.
One very interesting point mentioned in the post was the issue of - lying by lack of relevant information - like the example of potential trade with India.
Though, often I think lies are obvious. A more knotty problem is how to ease people away from things they clearly want to believe regardless of the evidence or common sense or basic reason...
As with 'SLA' - framed in a very readable style.


message 13: by Mike (new)

Mike Robbins Thank you Amanda. I am afraid the rotting garbage analogy is all too appropriate!

Some people will indeed always believe what they want to believe. This is especially easy for them when the con is a subtle one, such as a figure (like that Indian one) that looks impressive but actually has no comparator. I suppose one hopes that when one refutes such rubbish, third parties will take note, even if the original poster does not.


back to top