date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Andrea
(new)
Jun 04, 2018 04:42AM
Laura, First a comment on: be more direct. I'm getting that in critiques too, so I guess it's true, and I can either learn it now or 5 years from now. Thanks, "big sis." (disclaimer: we aren't actually related.) Re: the Qs. I like them--THEY'RE very direct :) and all over the place and it seems to me not only timely but based on comments you've already heard and what you ask yourself about what you read and yourself as a writer (I do too.). I want to hear answers to #2 and the process (did you plan it or was it a "major revision" as they call it?) #1 my first instinct was --the reader, for spending her time reading about murder. ;) All in all, I think they're intriguing thematic questions that will also cover the basic contents of the book (plot, characterization, and setting, as long as readers support their answers haha :) And I got it, felt, that Mean Bone is an idea book with elements of genre; it made me think about the ideas/depictions (now and how they'll hold up in say 10 years) as much as sleuth.
reply
|
flag
Hey Andi, you and I got our formal training in oblique technique, so I don't think we can be faulted if we tend to "tell all the truth but tell it slant." Being direct is a whole new skill.

If you've read Mean Bone, what do you think of these questions as a staring point? And if you haven't read Mean Bone yet, what do you expect, based on these questions?
