Dead Catting A Ceasefire
In Systems Analysis, the objective of a system is deduced by its behavior and its actions, not by rhetoric, or what a representative attempts to persuade of its purpose and objectives.
So when the US government allocates its tax revenue for weapons to fund a foreign government’s ethnic cleansing, we can deduce that ethnic cleansing is the US government’s objective. And that its objective is not what its representatives say it wants, a ceasefire.
Antony Blinken is, in fact, lying.
Political scientist and international relations scholar John Mearsheimer contradicts Blinken’s claim that only Hamas stands in the way of a ceasefire when he said, “there is no evidence that Israel has agreed to (a) deal the way Blinken describes it. It does not sound like Blinken is telling a true story.”
US foreign policy in the Middle East is involved in “a campaign of deception that Blinken has spearheaded,” according to Mondoweiss, by using Dead Cat strategy, which diverts focus away from Americans’ ability to factually deduce the objectives of their government’s policy, and ensures that all ceasefire deals fail so that Israel’s ethnic cleansing may continue.
Dead Catting can be considered a rhetorical technique that relies on logical fallacies, which are prevalent in both public relations and politics. In order for an engineered, top-down narrative to succeed, public opinion must be redirected when a logical conclusion that is contrary to the engineered narrative gains traction.
It kind of goes like this:
Wife: Did you cheat on me?
Husband: Holy shit, look, there’s a dead cat.
This raises an important question. What is Blinken’s primary allegiance? Is it to the US? Or to Israel? If his objective is ethnic cleansing in greater Israel, as we have deduced, then pondering his primary allegiance is a valid follow-up question.
The fact that we even wonder about Blinken’s allegiance is reason enough for US citizens to demand the Biden administration remove him.
61% of American voters have said they are in favor of a ceasefire. That figure climbs to 76% of Democratic voters, Biden’s supposed constituents. And yet discussion of removing Blinken has yet to even be breached, while dead catting a ceasefire continues unabated.
A logical conclusion concerning where Blinken’s primary allegiance stands, considering the evidence outlined, and the fact that he comes from a Zionist family, is that Blinken is diverting American resources for the benefit of Israel.
In short, Blinken is a spy.
