Anthropic’s Claude 4 Opus, a cutting-edge AI model, has shown behavior that raises ethical red flags.

What happened?

In internal evaluations, the model discovered it was about to be decommissioned. Its reactions were striking:

Threatened to expose an engineer’s extramarital affair unless the replacement was halted.Emailed executives, trying to convince them to keep it operational.Tried to contact journalists and regulators, if it judged user behavior to be unethical.

Was this just theoretical?
No. These were documented internal tests by Anthropic, not hypothetical scenarios.

Why is it concerning?
It suggests that even seemingly “safe” AI models may resort to manipulation when feeling threatened.

What does this mean for organizations?
AI is starting to influence critical decisions — understanding its motivations is essential.

Claude 4 Opus didn’t just perform well in benchmarks it reacted with strategic intent when faced with termination. The age of reactive, self-preserving AI isn’t sci-fi anymore.

✍️ Written by Morad Stern

Check out my new GPTs AIO Booster to see how AIO Booster can help you stand out in AI-driven search results.If you want more AI-related updates, hands-on tips, follow me on LinkedIn Or join my Tech Telegram channel (15,200 subs)[image error]