In 1983, Elly and Mangubhai published their influential study that compared reading high interest stories to ordinary language instruction and found that there was considerable improvement in reading comprehension and other measures in the two reading-based groups compared to the language instruction group.

I’ve been reminded recently that the paper is behind a paywall, so I thought I would produce a few figures from it here and highlight some of the aspects of the study.

The study participants were primary school students in Fiji, who normally received instruction in their native Fijian for the first three years, switching to English in Class 4.

Here are the residual gains for each Class 4 group (300 students from 12 primary schools) and each type of assessment. The shared book group experienced the teacher reading aloud, sharing the story in an enlarged format, with students joining in to read easier sections, and doing story-related activities. The silent reading group read books of their own choice for 20-30 minutes a day. The control group did the normal curriculum (SPC/Tate audio-lingual program).

Another table showed that the gains a year later, continuing with the same reading activities, were even greater. The results were improved for exam marks in other subjects, including maths.