My policy on Rating Books

As an avid reader who has now taken fledgling steps toward writing, I have begun thinking about those five stars that accompany many books including on sites like goodreads.

I would like to share my thinking and policy on my review ratings for books. Firstly, I cannot conclude on any book as bad, lousy, or any superlative terms that can be derogatory. Because, I think that as Indians we have come a long way with English fiction only because we have dared with conviction and determination to love and embrace English in our own Indian way. May there be millions of Indian fiction works of all types to form the plasma out of which a future generation of global writers emerge.

With that philosophy, I propose to be generous with praise, and reticent with criticism. As a result, you will only find ratings of 3/5 or more on my shelf. I shall not post a rating of 1 or 2, if I read something that i feel does not make me highlight three stars. I'd rather not rate it at all.

I plan to rate only books that I have read since September 2012. My earlier reads will not carry reviews or ratings. So you will find some books that I have read and enjoyed in the past, but will not be rated. Doesnt mean that they rank below 3. It is just because I may have moved on a lot meanwhile, and unless I read them again, an attempt to rate them will be flawed.
1 like ·   •  1 comment  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 21, 2012 06:03
Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jaideep (new)

Jaideep Khanduja I don't think skipping away from rating books that fall in 1 or 2 criteria is good in a sense that your followers will not be able to get a fair amount of idea on those books, as both skipped and unread will that way fall in same category, and might represent a wrong picture for both.


back to top