date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
ML
(new)
Nov 21, 2013 07:10PM
you might as well blog for people for people who enjoy reading!
reply
|
flag
I think I needed to read this. I have given a couple friends hell for reading the Twilight books simply because of the lack of good literature involved and following a trend. Same thing with 50 shades. At least they're reading! Thank you.
I'd like to take #27, especially, and claim it as my own. Thanks for this and I'll share it with friends. Oh, and give you all the credit!
Samuel wrote: "That...or everyone acts like a snob and we raise real snobs standards"Snobs don't have standards; they have expectations. ;)
My favourite thing about book snobs is that they look down on "mainstream" fiction (some of them even call it "trashy" - rude) but a lot of classics were the popular books/plays/poems of their day. Doesn't that make them "mainstream" too?
Reading is pleasure and so much joy, you live in the story in other people's heads, it is miraculous, educational, healing, though-provoking, everything and anything and no way it is snobbish. To me reading is mostly Pleasure and Enjoyment no matter how sad the topic might be.
Dear Mr Haig,I am a self proclaimed book snob. I dislike most of the popular books (Girl on the Train, Gone Girl-you get the idea). I would never ever think of discouraging anyone from reading. However if I ask you what type of book you like to read and the response is "murder mysteries", or Nicholas Sparks, I will tactfully change the subject. I loved every word, every sentence, and every character in your book The Humans....
Don't judge.
Matt: Such a breath of fresh air, your blog post is! I grew up surrounded by book snobs, which turned me right off reading - and as a child I was an advanced reader. At parent's night, my teachers would beg my folks to provide reading material for me to use in my free time, but they would agonise over what was appropriate, what was not, and would they be judged for what they gave me...? Horrors! Instead, I had nothing at all. I was even discouraged from checking out books from the library, in case I picked up something "silly". (People, don't do this to your kids!) This constant, snobby judgement discouraged me from reading well into adulthood. I've only recently said "f**k it" and I read what I want. Everyone should.Some of the comments here seem to have missed your point, which is to read what you like. We don't have to read every piece of careless rubbish out there in order to avoid being book snobs. We can still have our personal standards. OUR standards, not someone else's.
And thank you for your wonderfully honest interview with Bryony Gordon on her podcast. I will now pick up your books, because they will be enjoyed.
5. It is harder to be funny than to be serious. For instance, this is a serious sentence: 'After dinner, Alistair roamed the formal garden behind this unfamiliar house, wishing he had never betrayed Lorelei's trust.' That took me eight seconds to write. And yet I've been trying to write a funny sentence for three hours now, and I'm getting hungry.But then you succeeded in writing a funny sentence, so treat yourself to a peanut butter sandwich and a glass of white wine.
24. I used to be a snob. It made me unhappy.
I suspect many people become snobs because they're already unhappy.
This is such a great post! Thanks! Also, I've just finished reading "Reasons to Stay Alive" and I wanted to tell you how much I loved it!! I have depression and when I started reading your book I was not in a good place. I'm a little better now, but a LOT better for having read your brilliant book. Thank you so much for writing it.
Hannah (Ivyclad Ideas) wrote: "My favourite thing about book snobs is that they look down on "mainstream" fiction (some of them even call it "trashy" - rude) but a lot of classics were the popular books/plays/poems of their day...."3 years later I'm discovering this thread... and I can't agree enough about that word trashy being used to describe lots of mainstream fiction, especially areas that are primarily both written and consumed by women. To say that I hate the term is putting it mildly.
I have to say that I agree with virtually everything that Matt Haig has said in this blog post, and in particular
3. If something is popular it can still be good. Just ask Shakespeare. Or the Beatles. Or peanut butter.but do take exception to
14. Books are not better for being misunderstood, any more than a building is better for having no door.
17. Freedom is a process of knocking down walls. Tyranny is a process of building them.
8. It does not matter about who the author is. The only thing a book should be judged on is the words inside.
There are some of us that are unable or more to the point unwilling to separate the art from its creator for reasons such as virulent hate towards various groups of people that are different to themselves, or whom they "disagree" with such as females, queers and POC's amongst others. Or those that partake in various heinous crimes against other humans which has sometimes included their own children. There are even some 'artists' who try to copyright common words used in certain genres and then try to sue their peers for using the same word in their own novels prior to the copyright claim.
Whether the artist is still alive or now dead, some of us retain the right to choose not to support the work that was created at the same time as perpetuating various levels of hatred, crime or even just bad behavior against others.
I do believe that one of Mr Haig's rules should be to not judge others on their reasons for choosing or not choosing to consume to works of certain artists, even if it is nothing to do with the work itself. Afterall, there are plenty of other readers out there who will just ignore those issues and pay for and consume the works, and that is their right too.
Matt, I'm so grateful to you for this post, and for Reasons to Stay Alive. I look forward to reading your novels.
Dear Matt,I am a librarian. I buy books for my library district in Colorado. Your points about not being a book snob are wonderful.
I am one of the few librarians I know who admits she loves romances. One time a patron came to my desk and asked me to help her find some romances. She was told that I liked them--by a condescending book snob. I found some of my favorites for her. The woman told me that her seven-year old son had died the week before, and she needed something to give her a little bit of happiness. That is a true story. It's why when I buy books, I always try to envision the people who will love reading them.
I just finished The Midnight Library. I have been so depressed during COVID. Your book made a huge difference to me. I wrote down the line "Librarians are like soul-enhanced search engines." I changed careers twenty years ago. It felt like becoming a librarian was what I was always meant to do, but that I needed to do other things first to find the best job, one with a great purpose. Thank you so much.
Alice
Gab wrote: "This is such a great post! Thanks! Also, I've just finished reading "Reasons to Stay Alive" and I wanted to tell you how much I loved it!! I have depression and when I started reading your book I w..."READ MIDNIGHT LIBRARY!! I have been in an increasingly dark place for several months.
I think Todd Haig saved my life today.
It's funny that I read this blog post right after posting a review of The Midnight Library in which I started by admitting that I can be a prose snob but I loved the book (which I gave five stars). As a librarian, I try to read all kinds of books so that I can make recommendations to people who ask based on what kinds of books they love to read.People read for different reasons: some to be inspired, educated, or entertained, some to relax or escape. So- definitely no judgement. People should read what they love but maybe try to stretch a little sometimes too.
Graphic novels are probably the books I hear most often abused by people who come into the library, as in "I want books for my kid to read- s/he likes those comic books, but I want him/her to read REAL books." This makes me especially sad because: (1) Kids who like graphic novels are often at that fragile age where they may turn off books altogether if not allowed to pursue their own interests. Studies show kids are more likely to pursue reading when they get to choose their own material. And (2) there are some beautifully conceived and realized graphic novels wherein the visuals complement the text to a magical extent- these are so deserving of attention, not dismissal. (And some are just laugh-out-loud funny, and who doesn't need a laugh?)
But I digress- in short, "no" to book snobbery- but also please don't refer to people who genuinely prefer literary fiction or classics as snobs because they also have a right to find joy in their tomes of choice without shame. Personally, I tend to gravitate towards literary fiction or nonfiction most often, but have found great reading pleasure in everything from scifi to picture books. Quality isn't limited to any one genre- know what you like, but also explore a little!
I think you could have made one point that would have saved you putting this entire list together- get rid of the Booker prize. I rest my case.
This list and the list in The Humans --- you write these lists because it would take too long to write a novel for each brilliant observation? Yes? No?
I started to reading seriously a couple months ago and I'm loving it. I truly don't wanna lose this enthusiasm. And the things Haig have said are some of the reasons I Won't. Thank you, Sir.
El esnobismo me ha llevado a dejar de leer, hasta que un día me animé a leer lo que deseaba en ese momento sin pensar. Leer solo por el deseo de meterme en un mundo. Leo lo que quiero, lo que deseo y no prejuzgo. Y dejo los libros con los que me aburro.
Cada uno lee lo que quiere.
Me gusta mucho esta lista y me la guardé.
I enjoyed reading the list, but I don't agree with the premise. I love books. They are everywhere in my home. I haven't read all the books that I own; I don't think I ever will. But, it's a comfort just to have them.
I don't see book snobbery. The author doesn't know who will read her creation or what the reader will take away from the book. Whether its being read by members of a book club, or by someone who picked up the paperback for 25 cents at a yard sale.
In fact, I see reading as the great equalizer. A high school dropout can connect with Shakespeare, or Harper Lee, or Dan Brown... maybe all three.
As we grow and change we read the same material differently. I love To Kill a Mockingbird. I first read it in high school; I've seen the movie version several times; I reread To Kill a Mockingbird 30 years later; I saw Aaron Sorkin's version on Broadway. It's the same story, but its different each time I connect with it.
Instead of using To Kill a Mockingbird to make that point, I could have said something about War and Peace, or Pride and Prejudice, or The Red and the Black. Would one of these have made me a snob? Well, maybe the Red and the Black.
Reading is generally a solitary activity. No one has to know what you are reading unless you share the information.
Snobbery isn't about books, its about the snob. What do I wear, or drive? Where do I live? Where do I vacation? What wine do I drink? Snobbery is about insecurity, and lack of self confidence. It is form over substance. Reading is the opposite, it is substance over form.
These are just some thoughts of a lifetime reader.
You had me at number two: "All that fascist nonsense that leads commercial writers to think it is okay to be lazy with words and for literary writers to think it is okay to be lazy with story."
This was quite possibly the most redeeming piece I've read not only with regard to snobby readers but to snobby writers. As a writer of "fun" books, I desperately needed this.I just started reading The Midnight Library, and I'm loving it. Thank you, Matt Haig---I'm glad you are now on my radar.
kittykat AKA Jo Tortitude wrote: "Hannah (Ivyclad Ideas) wrote: "My favourite thing about book snobs is that they look down on "mainstream" fiction (some of them even call it "trashy" - rude) but a lot of classics were the popular ..."Hmmm, I hear you, and I've ripped a few such authors apart in my reviews, but freedom of speech is a right that I hold very sacred and it upsets me when I read about schools banning books etc.
Make your voice heard in opposition, by all means. We can be such Stupid Humans, but sometimes we learn from our mistakes. Tolerance can't be doled out in half measures, but I do understand your anger and unhappiness. Change is slow to come - we can't erase their hateful thinking and force them to be more tolerant, alas.
I love the way Matt Haig things! What he must have suffered, though, to get to this deep understanding of what we need to do to get by in this media-dominated, flashy world. For so many of us, being truly, sincerely and unashamedly yourself is almost impossible these days, what with all the social/media feeds that glamorize a sandwich or fruit plate at a restaurant (or a flashy car/glamorous outfit/billion dollar wedding celebration) at any given moment. Many are focusing on the wrong THINGS once again in their media posts... Gotta love Matt Haig! As my niece would say: you are The Man!
Huzzah! Too damn many people don't read at all. Better they read for entertainment than not. Because reading is a weapon against stupidity. Oops.. bit of snobbery slipped in there.
Thanks Matt Haig =)Thus was really uplifting, especially after having to listen to some real-life booksnobs earlier.
Your books helped me through.
Thansfor doing what you do.
I was just talking to a friend about your books, and I thought I'd drop by and give you a hearty THANK YOU! You make the world a bit better! - Diane
The long somewhat academic list really counters the point you are trying to make, I feel.N.B. A book can be good, but it doesn’t mean it’s literature.
Discuss.
☺️
Thank you. I really needed to read this, since for far too long I read books deemed "fitting my age" and often feel (unnessecarily) ashamed when picking up a "kids book". I think the whole snobism in books thing is very old. The first printed books where only something rich people could buy ( often they couldnt even read the books they owned ). Later, in Victorian times Bibliomania broke out anew. Suddenly people profiled and measured their wealth and worth in rare books to brag about at the clubs, even if they never read them!
Nowadays many young readers get repelled by schools forceing them to read books they dont want to, wich only makes matters worse.
Thank you again! I have some friends who really need to hear this too.
If I understand correctly, the term "snobbery of literary" refers to critics (reader or professional critics) who want to sound marginal, giving the image of being either unconventional or intellectual. In general, I am also against such individuals, but here is another fact: Life is not long enough to read all the books. Therefore, it matters what we expect from a book and what impression we get from it. Ultimately, making a conscious and qualified selection for reading is the culture every reader should get. Within this context, I may tolerate criticisms of a book (same for any product, movie, etc.) which will provide me with rational guidance to spend my resources on time, money, and effort, unless these criticisms are rude, arrogant, and destructive.







