Excerpt from vol III: Darcy fights a footpad

This was fun for me to write, since I teach fencing and the martial arts. It’s just how a fight always works out in your imagination, but never in real life; which, of course, is why they call it fiction.

The set-up is that Darcy has gone to London in search of Wickham and Lydia, and acquired some assistance in the form of one Sergeant Cooper, through the good offices of Colonel Fitzwilliam. Cooper is a seasoned fighting man, given to whistling when things are going his way. Having found out from Mrs. Younge that the couple was in St. Mary’s parish, Whitechapel, the two men go there to search for them.

*****

They were to spend some hours in this manner, searching the close and weary dens south of the high street; it was getting on in the afternoon when they crossed Whitechapel and proceeded up Osborn. It was there they encountered their first incident of note: as the gloom from the setting sun became darker, Darcy suddenly found himself set upon by two men; the first, wielding a knife that missed being a sword by inches only, stepped out directly in front of him; he was wiry and quick of movement, holding his weapon with practiced ease. The second, a hulking beast of a man, got between Darcy and Cooper, obviously intent on delaying Cooper from coming to Darcy’s aid.

When Darcy had been up at Oxford, he had, along with most young men of his class, taken lessons in the sword at a salle d’armes in town. Darcy had enjoyed the exercise a good deal, but there had been one individual whom Darcy could never abide, who was most devoted student of the rapier; rather than undergo the aggravation of practising daily with this disobliging individual, Darcy had turned to the single-stick. His pleasure in the art had given him application, and, by the time he left, he was more than proficient. At the time it had all been rather for his enjoyment and convenience, but now it turned to a material advantage, as a walking-stick differed from a single-stick only by the lack of a guard. He had the reach on his assailant by at least a foot, and addressed his blade en garde in third almost with amusement.

The footpad, seeing that Darcy had no intention of yielding easily, lost a good deal of his initial enthusiasm and swagger; he began circling Darcy, looking for an opening. Darcy took a quick scan of the footing around him, and noticed as well that the crowded street had become suddenly empty. From behind him, he could hear Sergeant Cooper was giving out as good as he got; his cheery whistle told Darcy there was little to worry about from that quarter. The man before Darcy, waving his blade sinuously in front of him, made a tentative lunge to test Darcy, but his distance was faulty, and he came within reach of Darcy’s arm; Darcy took his blade in fourth with a riposte volante to the left, which he carried down to low line, cutting back hard across the kneecap with the brass tip of his walking stick. As the man cried out, Darcy administered a soporific that quieted his cries: a solid coup de taille montante that caught the man on the left angle of the jaw, bringing his adversary an instant, relieving sedation, temporarily putting him beyond the pain his knee, and now his jaw, would know for weeks to come.

Darcy spun now to his rear, executing a passe avant to reach the other two, and finished with a heavy blow to the sinews on the larger man’s heel just as he set his weight on that foot to leap at Cooper; while the timing of this manœuvre was entirely fortuitous, the results were both impressive and satisfying: instead of vaulting forward at Cooper, the man’s leg gave way under him directly; as he fell, his skull came down on the curbing with a resounding crack, and suddenly all was still. Cooper looked from the man on the ground in front of him, to Darcy, then to the other man where he lay motionless, his knife still in his grip, and finally back to Darcy; he gave a low-pitched whistle and rubbed his cheek in wonder. While astounded at his good luck and the ease of his victory, Darcy met the sergeant’s gaze impassively—though he held his features in check with difficulty; his elation at having the whole engagement go so perfectly, as thoroughly in his favour as any he had ever imagined as “Dirks Darcy” in the woods at Rosings, made him want to dance about and wave his fists in the air. Such a very un-piratical display would, naturally, rob his performance of much of its effect, so he contented himself with a little twirling flourish as he brought his stick back to its proper place under his hand. Cooper went to the smaller man and, kicking the blade from his hand, reached down and retrieved it; he offered it to Darcy, who declined with a gesture. The sergeant tucked the blade into his belt at the back under his coat, and, with a new degree of respect, gestured for Darcy to precede him.
1 like ·   •  21 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 09, 2014 05:26
Comments Showing 1-21 of 21 (21 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Shannon (new)

Shannon K Wow, Darcy the man of action! I like! Will Elizabeth ever know what danger he ran? (I don't expect you to answer that...)


message 2: by Susan Ferkany (new)

Susan  Ferkany Where does one purchase volume 3? I can't find listed on Amazon.com where I bought 1 and 2?


message 3: by Stanley (new)

Stanley Hurd Hi Susan,

I regret to say volume III is now being written; it will be available this summer. This was just a little piece I thought I might share.

Stan Hurd


message 4: by Susan Ferkany (new)

Susan  Ferkany Ok that's good new. Can't wait to see your take on the ending.


message 5: by Elide (new)

Elide I just discovered your blog and this is my first posting - ever! But I loved your comment about "other barbarous authors" and I just had to say, you obviously have an appropriate appreciation of our Great Jane. Right On! By the way, do you have a date yet for the release of Vol. III? and will it be on ebooks?


message 6: by Stanley (new)

Stanley Hurd Dear Elide,

Thanks very much for your words of appreciation; I am honored that you would make my work the topic of your very first post! That’s a grand compliment to receive.

As for vol. III, it is still too weak and gawky to be sure when it will be ready to be pushed out of the nest. Summer, definitely; probably not June, though. I wish I could be more exact, but there are still some pieces of the story that don’t want to be written, and are fighting me; I’m not sure how long they will continue to resist. By the way, this is nothing new: it always happens, but it makes predictions iffy.

Stan


message 7: by L.preler (new)

L.preler I have just discovered and read Vol I and II. You have added to the original so beautifully. I could not set your books down until I finished and I can't wait for III. Thank you for bringing Darcey to life.


message 8: by Stanley (new)

Stanley Hurd L.preler wrote: "I have just discovered and read Vol I and II. You have added to the original so beautifully. I could not set your books down until I finished and I can't wait for III. Thank you for bringing Darce..."

Thanks very much, L.preler! Your compliments are felt the more because I have just had a 2-star review on Amazon calling me out for being unoriginal and boring, so thanks for making my morning!

Stan


message 9: by Sheila (new)

Sheila Majczan I, also, am new to this form of communication. I accepted your invite, after you read my review of your second volume on Amazon. I do follow many authors in the JAFF (Jane Austen Fan Fiction) on Austen Variations and enjoy some regular excepts on WIP (works in progress), as well as one "Readers' Choice" ongoing story.

It was so obvious in reading the above excerpt from Volume III that you are trained in fencing. Now I have to look up the various terms you used so as to not remain ignorant about what is going on during this melee.

Left brain and right brain are working well in one man here! Neurochemist, indeed!

I only expanded this interest in my world (JAFF) upon retiring a little over a year ago and also after purchasing a kindle for myself before Christmas. I have discovered so many authors and books, of which I was not aware. I do read the reviews before purchasing a book. Looking back at some of the authors I purchased before learning to read reviews I KNOW what you mean about "barbarous" authors. It is a shame when ODC's (Our Dear Couple's) names are used just to sell a product.

(I am spelling out acronyms as there were complaints on various sites about not knowing what such meant.)

I go on a shore vacation the first week in September, so am counting on taking your next book along on my kindle...LOL! I know you don't need the pressure - try to laugh, as I have a grin on my face, also.


message 10: by Stanley (new)

Stanley Hurd Sheila,

I envy you your vacation coming up; I’m pretty sure that vol. III will be out by then, and I hope it will add to your leisure hours.

Others have wanted to know the fencing terms as well, so I thought I would describe it all. “En garde in third” means you have your sword (stick) angled up at your right side, covering the area between the hip and face. A “riposte volante”, or flying riposte, is a move where you deflect the opponent’s blade in a move that carries all the way past the end of their sword, and then you strike back in another angle. In this case, Darcy swings the stick across his body from right to left, ending with it a little past his left shoulder. He then swings it down and across the footpad’s knee from left to right. Next, a “coup de taille” is a forehand cut, like in tennis, which in this case is “montante”, or rising, so Darcy finishes with a rising strike to the left side of his opponent’s jaw, knocking him out. Finally, the “passe avant” is a crossing step that travels a greater distance than a lunge, so he could reach the man attacking Sergeant Cooper.

And, by the way, after writing this piece and doing some research, I found that the Horse Guards, which is the unit the sergeant was attached to, didn’t have sergeants! Only corporals were/are used as non-coms, and they were equivalent to sergeants in other branches of the army. So Sergeant Cooper got changed into Corporal Sands for the book.

Best,

Stan


message 11: by Sheila (new)

Sheila Majczan Thank you for the education. I will have to copy this and keep it handy for when I order and read your book this summer. Research is something I don't think we readers realize is so time consuming and, I am sure at times, frustrating. Thank you for all your attention to those details.


message 12: by Kari (new)

Kari Now that June has arrived and summer is nearly upon us; are you closer to being able to predict a publication date for Volume III?


message 13: by Sheila (new)

Sheila Majczan I am drooling in anticipation. But don't want to hurry a good thing before its time is due!


message 14: by Stanley (new)

Stanley Hurd Hi guys,

I’m sorry to have taken so long to get back to you, but I have been sick as a dog since Tuesday; this is the first time I’ve sat at the computer in days. Anyway, I’m shooting for volume III to be out early in August. It’s still a little rough, and some of the emotional scenes between Darcy and Elizabeth are tough to get right. JA tells us, for example, that after his second proposal, if we can call it that, Darcy “expressed himself on the occasion as sensibly and as warmly as a man violently in love can be supposed to do”. But everybody has this vision of Darcy as a brooding, stoic type: how do we reconcile the two? I don’t see him as Clint Eastwood, but neither is he a sooo-in-touch-with-his-feelings metrosexual. Still struggling with that.

So, again my apologies. I’ll try to keep posting progress as it occurs.

Best,

Stan


message 15: by Sheila (new)

Sheila Majczan Hope you are feeling better. That's what's important. I know the wait will be worth it and don't want you to feel rushed. Get Well Soon. Sheila

No need to apologize.


message 16: by Stanley (new)

Stanley Hurd Sheila wrote: "I am drooling in anticipation. But don't want to hurry a good thing before its time is due!"

Hi Sheila!

I just wanted to thank you for your comment to that first review of volume III, both for your highly flattering description of my books, and for the courtesy of your comment. Whenever someone writes a review like that, where they are obviously judging without really giving the book a chance, I hardly know what to say; there was one here on Goodreads where the person who wrote it got volume II for free in a giveaway, didn’t like Jane Austen or P & P to begin with, hadn’t read the first book, and gave it a two-star rating. I can almost understand taking a shot on a free book, but writing a review under such circumstances kind of floored me. But, as I will never respond to less than a four-star review (to avoid contention, and looking like a thin-skinned moron), I thank you for encouraging the reader on Amazon to give the series another try, and I admire the gentleness of your instruction.

Best,

Stan


message 17: by Sheila (new)

Sheila Majczan I am almost 80% of the way through this third book, smiling at your exposé of the character of children (remembering our discussion here) and loving the first part of the book in which Darcy's thought processes take him from regret, disappointment and anger to a realization of how justified Elizabeth is in her stance. Had tears twice before Chapter Five! His discussions with his aunt: how poignant...as a wife and mother and the whole empty nest feeling. But in her situation with a son going off to war...yes, I can imagine how she felt and NO ONE listened. OK, I am determined to finish this tonight so I can post a better review. Thanks for getting back to me. Sheila


message 18: by Stanley (new)

Stanley Hurd Sheila wrote: "I am almost 80% of the way through this third book, smiling at your exposé of the character of children (remembering our discussion here) and loving the first part of the book in which Darcy's thou..."

Dear Sheila,

Thanks so much for such a wonderful review. I hope you didn’t lose too much sleep! You touched on many of my favourite points in the book in your review, which is very gratifying to an author: it's great to know that the reader got from it what he put into it. Thanks again.

Best,

Stan


message 19: by Sheila (new)

Sheila Majczan I have to say that the person from Texas who posted a review did an incredible job with interpreting the philosophy and poetry. I made remark to Meredith and Joy Dawn King that I have to go back and contemplate the philosophy...as I was trying to read through in one day. But it was all excellent. The whole set will be read again. And you are welcome. (BTW: I did save the fencing terms you gave me before...LOL.) Sheila


message 20: by Stanley (new)

Stanley Hurd Sheila wrote: "I have to say that the person from Texas who posted a review did an incredible job with interpreting the philosophy and poetry. I made remark to Meredith and Joy Dawn King that I have to go back a..."

Was that on Meredith’s blog? I would like to join the conversation.

Stan


message 21: by Sheila (new)

Sheila Majczan No, one of the reviews posted on Amazon. You will love it. Sheila

The remark to Meredith and Joy Dawn is b/c I have their e-mail addresses and we sometimes make private comments back and forth. Joy Dawn, at present, lives in S. America (Ecuador) but has been interviewed on several blogs. She and I connected over North and South and an author who wrote a sequel on the internet but never published. Excellent sequel.

odara7rox[at]rcn]dot]com if you ever want to say anything off record.

Sheila


back to top

Scrawls and Screed

Stanley Michael Hurd
This blog will mostly serve the needs of my fans (and therefore is likely to be very malnourished). But, having only recently been introduced to bloggery, and being already somewhat addicted, I hope i ...more
Follow Stanley Michael Hurd's blog with rss.