Long time no blog from me

Here is how I finished the new novel I mentioned in my last blog: I wrote the first sentence of it on 11/6/14 and the last sentence on 2/14/15, averaging 750 words a day, seven days a week. Writing the last sentence didn't mean the end of work, however. I printed out review copies for my wife, Rennie, and a handful of reader/friends. Then I let it sit unread for about two months while those early readers did their reading (and one of them actually spent six weeks reading it). Then I set about rereading, editing, and rewriting the thing. In the end it came to 67,000 words (four thousand longer than Ishmael).

One of my advance readers wrote: "Coming out of my bedroom I'm holding my breath and clutching the manuscript to my chest. Unable to utter a word, tears streaming down my face, I walk to the sofa and stand in front of my daughter. She looks up at me and says "you finished the book?, was it that touching?" I nod yes, several times, simply unable to utter a sound. I come into the kitchen, sit down and here I am typing to you. What can I say, you're gonna be the death of me!!!!! My heart can hardly take this. I read every page, I read every word, saw every punctuation mark."

What author wouldn't treasure a response like that!

Just before beginning work on this blog, sent it off to my agent. Twenty years ago a manuscript from me would have been sold immediately with a substantial advance, but the name Daniel Quinn is not now worth as much as it was then. In fact, because the books that came after Ishmael did not make nearly as much money, I became what is known in the trade as a midlist author. To put it in horse-racing terms, my track record was not very good. I'd had one great winner in my early career, but my later books were now running well back in the pack. This explains why no one wanted to publish After Dachau. That book and The Holy were published by the start-up press Context Books and later republished by Steerforth Press when Context failed.

Publishers in general (meaning ordinary rather than scholarly publishers) must make money to stay in business. Thus they definitely do not subscribe to the motto ars gratia artis ("art for art's sake"). What this means is that publishers are actually more open to publishing unknown authors with no track record at all than midlist authors with a poor or middling track record. It's for this reason that my new novel will go out to publishers authored not by midlist author Daniel Quinn but by an author with a name they've never seen before; it will thus be reviewed by unbiased readers.

I consider it the best of all my novels (not counting those of the Ishmael trilogy, which belong to an entirely different category). We'll see.

Meanwhile, now that this blog is done, I'll feel free to begin work on my next. Ten years ago I was convinced I had nothing more to write.
2 likes ·   •  11 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on April 13, 2015 16:09
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Dale (new)

Dale Great news, and great blog post!


message 2: by Daniel (new)

Daniel Quinn And thanks to you, Dale!

Dale wrote: "Great news, and great blog post!"


message 3: by Howie (new)

Howie Richey A
Thanks, Dan, for an under-the-hood look at the arcane world of publishing. Best of luck with sales!


message 4: by Daniel (new)

Daniel Quinn Sales are things that lie in the distant future! Acceptance to publication comes first -- and even that may be many months away.

Howie wrote: "A
Thanks, Dan, for an under-the-hood look at the arcane world of publishing. Best of luck with sales!"



message 5: by Mark (new)

Mark Congratulations -- so looking forward to reading your new work!


message 6: by Daniel (new)

Daniel Quinn If the present plan holds, the author's name will be a pseudonym, though I will highly recommend it here (with a wink).

Mark wrote: "Congratulations -- so looking forward to reading your new work!"


message 7: by Mark (last edited Apr 17, 2015 10:57AM) (new)

Mark As long as your fans can know where to find it, a rose by any other name will do just fine :)

Daniel wrote: "If the present plan holds, the author's name will be a pseudonym, though I will highly recommend it here (with a wink)."


message 8: by Howie (new)

Howie Richey Sounds like a publisher would be more open to pick up a book by "Jon Jones" than Daniel Quinn. What about self-publishing?


message 9: by Daniel (last edited Apr 20, 2015 06:55AM) (new)

Daniel Quinn Self-publishing is an act of desperation, even for someone who has a following. Not really much better than tossing it in the trash. This is why I urge aspiring writers not to take that quick, easy, and cheap way to get a book printed (which is all that it is. They give up on publishers after receiving one or two rejections. I point out that Margaret Mitchell's GONE WITH THE WIND was rejected 38 times. Thor Heyerdahl's KON-TIKI: 20 times. William Golding's LORD OF THE FLIES: 20 times. Frank Herbert's DUNE: 23 times. John Grisham's A TIME TO KILL: 12 times. Robert M. Pirsig‘s ZEN & THE ART OF MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE: 121 times. Richard Bach's JONATHAN LIVINGSTON SEAGULL: 18 times. Stephen King's CARRIE: 30 times. J. K. Rowling's HARRY POTTER AND THE SORCERER’S STONE: 12 times. If they had self-published these books, they would have been forgotten long ago.


Howie wrote: "Sounds like a publisher would be more open to pick up a book by "Jon Jones" than Daniel Quinn. What about self-publishing?"


message 10: by Jeff (new)

Jeff You will always be considered one of my favorite authors, I still think Story of B would make an excellent film. I can't wait to read the new one!!


message 11: by Daniel (new)

Daniel Quinn The central problem in translating The Story of B into a feature film is making Charles Atterley seem dangerous enough to be worth assassinating. The agent of this assassination can't be a wild-eyed zealot (or the assassination becomes trivial); it must be a sane and respected religious leader with a mind subtle enough to see how dangerous Charles Atterley is (and ruthless enough to have him snuffed). In the book, this is accomplished through Jared's reflections about Fr. Lulfre and through the lectures and personal sessions Jared has with Atterley that are transmitted to Fr. Lulfre, ultimately stirring him to take deadly action.

Think of all that MLK had to do to be deemed worth assassinating!

Consider: It takes half of the book's narrative events and some three hours of lectures to accomplish this in the novel. It's my private estimate (and just an estimate, of course) that it would take 120 minutes of film (20 minutes of lectures in that 120) to make Charles Atterley seem dangerous enough to be worth assassinating (by the sane, intelligent Fr. Lulfre). Okay--if my estimate is good, then a feature film is obviously impossible.)

All the same, I know a film-school student who worked on a B screenplay for at least two year--though I haven't heard from her for while!


back to top

Daniel Quinn's Blog

Daniel Quinn
Daniel Quinn isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Daniel Quinn's blog with rss.