Excerpt: A letter from Col Fitzwilliam

I’m getting closer to having Colonel Fitzwilliam finished, so I thought you guys might like an excerpt or two. Colonel Fitzwilliam has met and fallen in love with Miss Emily Chelwood, and she with him; unfortunately he is sent to France right after they meet, and he does not propose in order to leave her free if anything untoward occurs while he is away; that was dumb, of course, but they both thought they were doing the right thing, protecting each other from the strength of their feelings. But he can’t keep himself from writing to her while he’s away, and uses Elizabeth as a go-between. This is the third of his letters, and Elizabeth has gotten fairly accustomed to her role as note-passer and confidante.

We start with the Colonel’s letter from France, then we pick up Emily and Elizabeth in Emily’s drawing-room, where she shares her feelings with Elizabeth (we pass over a letter of explanation to Darcy and Elizabeth from Colonel Fitzwilliam, and their discussion thereof; this happens with each letter, giving our D&E addicts a little fix). In it he mentions Esparza, his companion on his mission in France; Esparza is named after our dear friend Meredith, of Austenesque Reviews, lest there be any doubt.


Rochefort, France
Sunday, May 9th, —

My dearest Emily,

A month gone, and this, only my third time of writing you; yet it seems that whole ages of the world have passed by since I last saw you. We have been through Bordeaux, where the wine merchants were so thick and English so often heard on the streets, that I almost thought myself in Piccadilly; now we are at Rochefort, a port city on the Bay of Biscay. As it is Sunday, the only thing moving in the area is the River Charente, winding sluggishly to the sea, and the time drags unendurably. It has been a day of torture to me, as, with nothing going forward, I have no deeds to occupy my mind, and no hope of moving my task forward that I may return to you. And so it is that I find my resolve once again overset, and I sit down to commune with you, the keeper of my heart.

Since writing to you last, I have sought to do as I said I would, devoting each day wholly to the completion of my affairs, thereby hastening my return. All in all, I have not been entirely unsuccessful, but the days begin to run together; I awake, and I yearn for you; I work and strive through the day, and I yearn for you; I retire, and I yearn for you. Mightily do I wish I had not been required to leave your side betimes, that we might have been sure of each other before my leaving. Such frankness cannot surprise you, surely, my dearest, and I trust will not distress you.

This afternoon I find myself enervated and indolent; were I at home, I should like nothing better than to sit with you on the landing, holding hands in silence and contentment, as we watched the world pass by outside the window. This vision has become one version of Paradise to me: peace, home, quietude, and you. There are others, but they all share the common thread of your presence: anywhere you are, is Heaven to me.

Esparza has taken himself off, I know not where; he is an odd fellow—amusing, affable, and sometimes unaccountable. But I like him, and he has been an excellent companion during my travels; I hope I shall be able to introduce you on our return.

Forgive me: I am rambling, I know; but there is nothing for me to do, save writing these paragraphs to you, that I might feel closer to you. I see you instantly here before me, your smile warming my heart, and your sweet voice calming my soul. I must hold firmly to this image, for without it I fear the beasts within me would be loosed, and I would rage all the way to Paris to be done with my commission. But I conjure you up and all is quiet, and moves sweetly within me; your unalloyed purity, virtue, and composure infuses my mind, reforms my unease and frustration, and makes me still again. And so here I sit, whiling away my solitary afternoon, in company with the vision of light and love that is my beloved.

Goodness, how maudlin I am become! You must think me in liquor, but I am not, on my honour; it is only missing you that disorders my thinking and makes me sound the fool. I would gladly play the fool for you, my dearest, if it would amuse you, or ease your day; I only pray that you are well, and do not ache for me as I do for you. Your pain is ever more painful to me than my own, and to be its author is ever my dread.

Well, this has taken a turn I do not wish to follow, and I shall therefore leave off; I shall take myself out into the sun for a stroll, and imagine you on my arm, as when we visited Whitehall; or perhaps I shall sit by the square and watch the couples as they promenade, or ride the lanes in their carriages, and imagine we are amongst them.

Be well and strong for my sake, as I shall be for yours. I am, as always,

Your adoring,

Edmund


And now for Emily and Elizabeth:


On entering the drawing-room Miss Chelwood saw that Elizabeth had another letter for her, and lost no time in reading it. As she read, her soft exclamations of tenderness, seemingly almost designed to elicit enquiry, soon produced their effect. “Emily, for Heaven’s sake! Whatever are you mooning over?”

“Oh, Elizabeth,” said she, “my poor boy! He sounds so lorn and alone!”

“‘Lorn and alone’!” Elizabeth demanded, surprised. “Gracious! Is that Shakespeare?”

“I think not,” Emily replied, colouring. “Donne, perhaps—or neither; I can no longer be sure. I have been reading both, I confess, but it may in fact have come from my own disordered sensibilities.”

“Perhaps you had better limit your reading to prose, dear,” Elizabeth said practically, “as being less likely to discompose the emotions; at this rate we shall soon have to dress you in one of those high, peaked head-dresses, with a scarf flying from its top, and a pendant belt, that you might suffer and swoon the better for your roving knight.”

Emily blushed again, saying, “I only meant he did not sound as if he were in spirits.”

“Yes, in his letter to us Darcy thought he detected that he was not quite himself. Is aught amiss, or does he merely pine?” This last she said with mischievous relish.

“Elizabeth! How can you be so heartless?”

“As he is one of my favourite connexions, and as we have always enjoyed a bit of raillery, if I do enjoy it rather more than I ought, I am sure he will forgive me and understand. But in all honesty I am only too delighted to see him succumb at last to his heart; and I would have you know how truly delightful it is to me that the two of you are together. I am sure I know no other couple so well-suited to one another.”

“There is you, and Mr. Darcy,” Emily said.

Elizabeth did not speak immediately, lost in a reflection on her own early days as a lover and wife. “Perhaps so,” she mused. “And I dare say we were just as bad, at first. But then, maybe that is it: misery loves company.”

“Misery!”

“No, no, my dear; it is only just an expression. I mean, having been so one’s self, it is reassuring to see another, for whom one holds a strong regard, act the same. One does not feel quite such a mooncalf, then.”

“Am I a mooncalf?” asked Emily in a small voice.

“Completely,” Elizabeth assured her affectionately. “Palpably, undeniably, indescribably so; it is terribly sweet, you know. And he is every bit as bad as you. Is not that delicious?”

Emily looked a little alarmed and ashamed, but then she brightened, saying with conspiratorial glee, “Yes—it is.” The two young women laughed, and Elizabeth proceeded to question her minutely on the Colonel’s letter, to Emily’s complete satisfaction.
1 like ·   •  7 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 26, 2015 04:28
Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Shannon (new)

Shannon K This was a sweet, fun read! Emily is fortunate to have a friend like Elizabeth to confide in and to be teasingly indulged in her lovesickness. The Colonel needs a calming voice too (perhaps Esparza is?). And, um, Colonel dear, you *do* realize that writing a letter like that to a lady of Emily's disposition is counterproductive to your prayers that "you do not ache for me as I do for you"?


message 2: by Stanley (new)

Stanley Hurd Hey Shannon!

Thanks for the comment; I think the Colonel is stretched a little thin, too, and he hasn’t even hit the real rough patch, yet. But, no, he does *not* get that he is acting contrary to his own wishes: he thinks he’s confessing a weakness, opening his heart to his girlfriend the way you’re supposed to be able to, and maybe hoping for a little sympathy. He would be surprised, and probably shocked, if someone were to tell him that she would love him all the more as a result—who would love such an emotional goop (according to his view of things, that is)? He would feel he was burning emotional currency with such an outpouring, not increasing it. Men are odd, no? ;-)

Best,

Stan


message 3: by Shannon (new)

Shannon K His thoughts as you describe them are certainly unsurprising for a man of his era. I still think he must not know her very well (you do say in your intro that he is sent to France soon after meeting her), if he would be "shocked" by her response.


message 4: by Stanley (new)

Stanley Hurd Hey Shannon,

That’s an interesting observation—and a little embarrassing, too, since I wrote the letter by putting myself in his shoes; I guess my feelings are about 200 years out of date! :-) But you know, on those occasions in which I have written down my feelings for someone, I always did so with a sort of apologetic air; like I was trying to explain why I acted in a certain way, or why I was hoping for what I was hoping for. It wasn’t to try to change how they feel, because, a) I don’t understand love at all: I don’t know how or why it happens, and I certainly don’t know how to go about trying to influence it in someone else; and, b) I would never try to change someone else’s feelings for me in any way. I want them to feel what they feel. I wouldn’t like it at all if I thought they had to be “sold” on me—that term’s a little harsh, maybe, but suffice it to say I would never want to think I had manipulated someone’s feelings for me. Maybe I’m just too arrogant to accept anything but “a perfectly spontaneous, untaught feeling.”

Also, most men I know have no other emotional outlet, no other focus for tender feelings, than the lady in their lives. This makes them perhaps a little clumsy, and surely inexperienced, in how such communications work, and how powerful they might be; that’s why I think it would surprise and even shock him to know their effect.

So, with this letter, I think the Colonel had to have started out apologetically, for once again writing when he had no right to, and then tried to explain the feelings that had forced him into it, hoping she would understand and forgive him. Beyond that, he was just indulging himself in an imaginary afternoon in her company, thinking how wonderful that would be, and sharing those thoughts with her. Simple—like most things male.

Thanks for making me think a little harder. :-)

Best,

Stan


message 5: by Shannon (new)

Shannon K On rereading, I see my comment yesterday was vague. What was clear in my head but not in my words is that “his thoughts” referred to your explanation of them (“he thinks he’s confessing a weakness,” etc.). My impression is that men today are more encouraged to show their emotions, that expressing feelings is seen less as a sign of weakness, compared with Austen’s time. If I’m wrong, chalk it up to my not having been a man in either era :). While the language of the Colonel’s letter is naturally outdated at times, his longing for the presence of the woman he loves obviously isn’t!

I don’t mean to suggest that the Colonel crafted (or should craft) his letter to make Emily love and miss him more. I do find it funny and charming that he mistakes how she will respond to the letter…but only because he has not known her long and still feels the natural diffidence and clumsiness of a new relationship. If, say, he writes her a similarly heartfelt letter after they have been married a couple years, he might still see himself “an emotional goop” for doing so, but it would be very sad if he still knew her so little that he expected her to be amused at his feelings or, worse, think less of him (that he had burned emotional currency). Even Elizabeth, with her practicality and sharp sense of the ridiculous, does not think less of him, and while I have just “met” Emily, she seems a more gentle and tender-hearted lady than Elizabeth.


message 6: by Stanley (new)

Stanley Hurd Dear Shannon,

First, may I say what a great pleasure this is, discussing such points as these with a thoughtful reader? I am very grateful for your interest, your time, and your thoughts.

I agree very much with your points above, and let me hasten to say I didn't take your comments to mean you thought the Col was being artful, trying to manipulate Emily. I think our one point of divergence, his general awareness of his ability to influence her, stems from how I perceive men and women.

It strikes me I must be pretty old-fashioned, when you consider it, even to be able to write what I write. Since I wrote the letter from my own perspective, as a test I just tried something different: I had Emily and Edmund change places as author and receiver of the letter, and re-read it. It was quite hard to make it fit with a feminine voice, at least in my mind. I have two daughters, both very dear to me, and of whom I am very proud; they have rather disparate personalities, though, and I tried to hear the letter in each of their voices: I failed. The problem was that the characters of the two principals in the letter are cast very much along the old lines of masculinity and femininity (it brought Anne Elliot’s discussion with Captain Harville to mind: “Neither time, nor health, nor life, to be called your own. It would be too hard, indeed” (with a faltering voice), “if woman's feelings were to be added to all this.”). So I think your point about the difference in era must be the explanation: such a letter as this simply would not strike the same note from today’s more emotionally aware man. In defense of my antiquated notions, I personally have not seen such a great difference in the young men who have come through my studio in the last decade and those Austen described, and I have taken that as an indication that, while it is not strictly politically correct to say so, the fundamental instincts driving gender roles have not drifted too very far over the last 200 years. And, certainly, the guys in the studio have been just as stupidly clueless and out of touch with their female counterparts as the men in Austen’s works. Then again, guys who study fencing and the martial arts might be considered to be anachronistic by nature, so perhaps my population sample is skewed.

In any event, I conclude that your interpretation is…not more correct, perhaps…more valid, in that it is more current. But I will comfort myself with the thought that, as Austen’s works still resonate today with readers of both genders, my kind of man, while undoubtedly a dinosaur, is not yet completely extinct, and a fading whisper of his glory days still echoes down through the collective memory. Like Pan playing the flute seductively to the nymphs in a forest bower, he had some repellant aspects, but was not wholly without charm.

All the best,

Stan


P.S. There is a taste of the beginnings of their relationship in an earlier blog: https://www.goodreads.com/author_blog...


message 7: by Shannon (new)

Shannon K Personally, when my views or language are called old-fashioned, I take it as a compliment... :).

It doesn't seem to me that our theories regarding why he does not understand his influence with her are mutually exclusive--perhaps they are both valid?

Thanks for reminding me of that earlier excerpt. I look forward to reading the Colonel and Emily's full story!


back to top

Scrawls and Screed

Stanley Michael Hurd
This blog will mostly serve the needs of my fans (and therefore is likely to be very malnourished). But, having only recently been introduced to bloggery, and being already somewhat addicted, I hope i ...more
Follow Stanley Michael Hurd's blog with rss.