Becoming an author changed my approach to writing reviews for the books I read. It shocks me to see how many reviewers seem eager to attack an author using spoilers, harsh criticism, and negative personal opinions that are often irrelevent. Being the recipient of some of this has made me realize even more how unnecessary those things often are, even for a negative review.

I came across these great suggestions!

"-Review the book in front of you, not the book you wish the author had written. You can and should point out shortcomings or failures, but don’t criticize the book for not being something it was never intended to be.

-With any luck, the author of the book worked hard to find the right words to express her ideas. You should attempt to do the same. Precise language allows you to control the tone of your review.

-Never hesitate to challenge an assumption, approach, or argument. Be sure, however, to cite specific examples to back up your assertions carefully.

-Try to present a balanced argument about the value of the book for its audience. You’re entitled—and sometimes obligated—to voice strong agreement or disagreement. But keep in mind that a bad book takes as long to write as a good one, and every author deserves fair treatment. Harsh judgments are difficult to prove and can give readers the sense that you were unfair in your assessment."

(source: http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts...)

Keep in mind, there is a person (their heart, time, and effort) behind every book you are reviewing. Even if you have nothing pleasant to say, it can always be said with a bit of grace!

Happy reading (and reviewing)!!