Genres

Leftist

Lists

Foundations of Economics by Yanis Varoufakis

Heterodox Economics Book Club

130 books — 50 voters

Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley

Naomi Klein’s Book Recommendations

4 books — 1 voter

Books Filmed by Joseph Losey

19 books — 5 voters

The Hundred Years' War on Palestine by Rashid Khalidi

Bobby Gillespie’s Book Recommendations

2 books — 1 voter

The Christian Left by Anthony A.J. Williams

The Heart Of The World by Charles Monroe Sheldon

Culture and Political Crisis in Vienna by John W. Boyer

Christian Socialism

15 books — 1 voter

Long Macchiatos and Monsters by Alison Evans

Punk's Not Read: punk rock related fiction

46 books — 11 voters

Featured News & Interviews

Books to Celebrate Black History Month (and Read All Year-Round)

Read »

“ Not surprisingly, historically speaking, dictators have always despised the use of humor, precisely because they recognize that their hold over people is ultimately fragile, based on force and lies, and humor undermines their rule. ”
― Gad Saad, The Saad Truth about Happiness: 8 Secrets for Leading the Good Life

1 likes

“ It is easier to attain Marx's goal, however, if you do not have to rely on everyone being morally magnificent all the time. Socialism is not a society which requires resplendent virtue of its citizens. It does not mean that we have to be wrapped around each other all the time in some great orgy of togetherness. This is because the mechanisms which would allow Marx's goal to be approached would actually be built into social institutions. They would not rely in the first place on the goodwill of t It is easier to attain Marx's goal, however, if you do not have to rely on everyone being morally magnificent all the time. Socialism is not a society which requires resplendent virtue of its citizens. It does not mean that we have to be wrapped around each other all the time in some great orgy of togetherness. This is because the mechanisms which would allow Marx's goal to be approached would actually be built into social institutions. They would not rely in the first place on the goodwill of the individual.... One would expect any socialist institution to have its fair share of chancers, toadies, bullies, cheats, loafers, scroungers, freeloaders, free riders and occasional psychopaths...Communism would not spell the end of human strife. Only the literal end of history would do that. Envy, aggression, domination, possessiveness and competition would still exist. It is just that they could not take the forms they assume under capitalism - not because of some superior human virtue, but because of a change of institutions. These vices would no longer be bound up with the exploitation of child labour, colonial violence, grotesque social inequalities and cutthroat economic competition. Instead, they would have to assume some other form. Tribal societies have their fair share of violence, rivalry and hunger for power, but these things cannot take the form of imperial warfare, free-market competition or mass unemployment, because such institutions do not exist among the Nuer or the Dinka. There are villains everywhere you look, but only some of these moral ruffians are so placed as to be able to steal pension funds or pump the media full of lying political propaganda. Most gangsters are not in a position to do so. Instead, they have to content themselves with hanging people from meat hooks. In a socialist society, nobody would be in a position to do so. This is not because they would be too saintly, but because there would be no private pension funds or privately owned media. Shakespeare's villains had to find outlets for their wickedness other than firing missiles at Palestinian refugees. You cannot be a bullying industrial magnate if there isn't any industry around. ...more ”
― Terry Eagleton, Why Marx Was Right

1 likes

More quotes...