
Your TOP FIVE READS in 2013. No matter the genre, no matter the publication date, all that matters is that you read these books in 2013 and consider them your personal favourites.
Please don't vote for more than 5 books. You may change your votes until 31 December, but 5 books is the max. number of votes for you at any time ;)
Your Top 5 Reads by Year:
2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019
2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025
Bettie
15673 books
19 friends
19 friends
Carey
3201 books
51 friends
51 friends
Ellinor
6683 books
626 friends
626 friends
Clare
932 books
73 friends
73 friends
Neil
2549 books
442 friends
442 friends
Pixelina
3928 books
200 friends
200 friends
Gerry
4179 books
71 friends
71 friends
Susanna - Censored by GoodReads
3386 books
852 friends
852 friends
More voters…
Comments Showing 1-46 of 46 (46 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Jan 14, 2013 05:05AM
Great idea dear Bettie.
reply
|
flag
The corresponding 2012 list brought out quite a few 'authors behaving badly' - it was lassoed by list fixers.
Great idea. And, I do hope the badly behaving authors and their minion will stay away. It is disheartening when the authors resort to underhanded cheating. Bad!Bad!Bad!
The question is - to vote for great books as I read em, or wait and see...Well, nothing is written in stone!
I wanted to use my full five right away so I added the best so far and the most looking forward to. I'm sure things will change. Great way to form a list for the year Bettie!
I chose five unknown books, to me. The road of discovery is ahead in 2013. Thanks! Do we start anytime?
I'm afraid I'm not even close to being ready to vote for the top five books of 2013 when we're only two weeks into the year. I've only read five books so far and none of them were knock-it-out-of-the-park superstars.....
Perusing the list to find some new good reads to take on holidays - so many temptations. I'm wondering what criteria others are using to define their top reads? What makes a "good" book stand out??I'm pretty demanding when I rate books. For five stars I want a book that is a compelling story with a unique plot. I like a lot of atmosphere so I can lose myself in the experience. I am also pretty critical of how well the book is written - whether there are a lot of cliches or if the language is appropriate to the period (I hate to hear popular sayings appear in historic contexts for example) I get distracted and the story loses its "believability" for me.
I like characters that are really well fleshed out so that I can believe the choices they make - for instance why oh why would the vampire in Twilight who has hundreds of years of experience and culture fall for a shallow teenage girl - there just isn't enough depth to her to or to him to take the story beyond a fairy tale. (Hmm maybe fairy tales have more depth than Twilight .... have to think on that a bit ...)
Re: Isn't It Pretty To Think So?: Can sock puppets have favorite reads if all their drawers contain is a single book? (Bettie: License to chop, or are you feeling generous?)
Get that hideosity off my list. Please.@ Ian - scummy sock puppet voting across listopia. School is out and where some students will want to read, some pretend they have read - just the one book mind, and not a review or friend amongst 'em.
Themis-Athena wrote: "Hideosity purged."Thankee.
I am quite pished off with these lists for the moment. What is tiresome, is that even bad publicity is good publicity.
I'll be along to play again once school holidays are over.
Thanks again for all your help.
:O)
Its strange that people take the time to bother with doing this. Is it the authors or just people who are big fans of the book?
Usually it's a combination of both -- and as Bettie says, at least in part they're gambling on the fact that even bad publicity is good publicity (in the sense that notoriety is better than not being talked about at all).Spam and fake reviews are a big (and bad) thing these days ... people, especially self-published authors, are willing to pay considerable amounts of money for this type of "service":
http://www.forbes.com/sites/suwcharma...
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/26/bus...
http://aclweb.org/anthology/P/P11/P11...
This list wins for most educational comment section. And it makes me chuckle: someone is 'pished' and nods vigorously. Thanks for both the information and giggles.
Renee wrote: "This list wins for most educational comment section. And it makes me chuckle: someone is 'pished' and nods vigorously. Thanks for both the information and giggles."Thanks Renee, have a great weekend!
:O)
I see that the top three books on the list currently have been put there by a circle of authors voting for each other's books. How cute. Not.
There are more in the circle, a bit further down the list, as well.Do they really think it fools anyone?
I take it that's a rethorical question ...Or perhaps more to the point, they simply don't care, because even bad publicity (being found out to be cheating/misbehaving) is good publicity!
It's gotten to the point where you automatically distrust almost anyone with the (Goodreads author) after their name.
Jeanette (jema) wrote: "It's gotten to the point where you automatically distrust almost anyone with the (Goodreads author) after their name."Yes, almost -- except if they're a well-established author who just happens to be a GR author also!
List is looking pretty legit now.It's a weird thing to read over one of these and see books I love, but can't vote for because I didn't read them this year. Where was all that love for Sunshine last year when I did vote for it? :P
always some strange ducks in there...Somewhere upriver: 18 ratings in total (most 5 stars obviously) and 14 votes here, all ranking it 1 out of 1.
Sigh.













