The best historical romance books I've read.
Suvi
2295 books
7 friends
7 friends
Barbara
3809 books
28 friends
28 friends
Kathrynn
1626 books
46 friends
46 friends
Cindy
10720 books
159 friends
159 friends
Jessica
114 books
306 friends
306 friends
new_user
1555 books
193 friends
193 friends
Susanna - Censored by GoodReads
3386 books
851 friends
851 friends
Sandra
889 books
69 friends
69 friends
More voters…
Comments Showing 1-30 of 30 (30 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Anna
(new)
Jul 02, 2009 11:42AM
I think that For the Roses by Julie Garwood needs to be added to this list. As do all the Cynsters by Stephanie Laurens, all the Sherbrooke Bride books by Catherine Coulter, and all the Julia Quinn books about the Bridgertons. And lots of others. I think I'll have to do my own list.
reply
|
flag
From one Anna to another . . . I agree with you! I love the Sherbrooke series; so funny and adventurous. And every one of the Bridgerton siblings was lovable and had a great story. Especially Eloise and Colin--their stories are my top 2, but I love them all.
Do the voters ever read the list titles or categories? How could 13 people vote for Eclipse by Stephenie Myers? Historical--really? What century or decade was the setting? I liked the Twilight series, but can someone please remove it from this list.
Henryetta wrote: "Do the voters ever read the list titles or categories? How could 13 people vote for Eclipse by Stephenie Myers? Historical--really? What century or decade was the setting? I liked the Twilight s..."I was reading the list and I saw it too. Historical romance? I mean, REALLY? Seriously, people.
Have no idea why books from Bronte and Austen are on this list either -- they aren't historical romance. Good books, but utterly contemporary when they were written. They belong on a classics shelf.
That is strange that people would call Eclipse historical fiction. The Twilight books were published not that long ago...
Historical fiction tells a story that is SET IN THE PAST--not necessarly published in the past. Since all of the "Twilight" books are set in present day--as noted by the cars the characters drive--they can NOT be historical fiction. What is or is not considered "historical" is discussed in the comments of "Best Historical Fiction".
Wow, I think you got some great books in here, personally, I have a complete reading list for holidays-time, thank you! According to the voting of some people ("users") I know online, I learn that the books you included on this list are incredible, and I would like to thank you for this, so Thanks A Lot!I gonna vote now, for the book that I do know. Gone with the Wind, which is amazing, and the Jane Austin, the first book on the list, for now, anyway.
Cryselle wrote: "Have no idea why books from Bronte and Austen are on this list either -- they aren't historical romance. Good books, but utterly contemporary when they were written. They belong on a classics shelf."Austen? Come on, she is The author of historical romance :)
Siasiam wrote: "can anyone tell me abuout this site?? am new here..can we read online here????"
Not really, this is more to give you an idea about what you might want to read.
Not really, this is more to give you an idea about what you might want to read.
I've removed the Twilight books from the list - the people who added it or voted for it clearly hadn't read the list description.
"The Odyssey" is gone from the list, as well as the books that were added twice or were listed under a wrong title.
Hanae wrote: ""The Odyssey" is gone from the list, as well as the books that were added twice or were listed under a wrong title."
Thanks, I appreciate it when a librarian cleans up these lists.
Thanks, I appreciate it when a librarian cleans up these lists.
Technically, historical fiction means a fictional story that is set in the past (any time in the past..not necessarily "long, long ago") and is usually centered around a historical event. Austen and Bronte aren't technically historical fiction because they aren't centered around historical events. Not in the same, clear way that "Gone With the Wind" and Gabaldon's "Outlander" are. Quite a few books on this list don't belong.
I've seen quite a number of books on this list I personally wouldn't consider a 'historical romance' but that might be a matter of opinion :-) Anne Frank's diary, however, is definitely not a historical romance and will be removed.
Pride and Prejudice and Jane Eyre are not historical fiction. They were written about the time periods they were written during. If that's all it takes for something to be historical, I'm sure we'll eventually have to have Eclipse re-added to this list. ;)
Anna wrote: "I think that For the Roses by Julie Garwood needs to be added to this list. As do all the Cynsters by Stephanie Laurens, all the Sherbrooke Bride books by Catherine Coulter, and all the Julia Quinn..."yes,I totally agree
Henryetta wrote: "Historical fiction tells a story that is SET IN THE PAST--..."In my opinion, historical fiction means it is not set when it was first publishsed. For instance, Pride and Prejudice is not historical fiction, as it was set in the time it was written. It needs to be set in the past (50 years or more, or such).
Elizabeth wrote: "Pride and Prejudice and Jane Eyre are not historical fiction. They were written about the time periods they were written during...."I agree...
Cryselle wrote: "Have no idea why books from Bronte and Austen are on this list either -- they aren't historical romance. Good books, but utterly contemporary when they were written. They belong on a classics shelf."I totally agree...
Related News
One of the great pleasures of an adventurous reading life is discovering new authors. If you’re the kind of book lover who likes to head...
Anyone can add books to this list.

















