Jeff Keehr
asked
Dave Cullen:
This is off-topic but I wonder if you have any insight into the motive behind Stephen Paddock's mass murder? Having read your Columbine book, I am thinking this guy was a psychopath who kept himself out of trouble for most of his life but his disdain for human beings finally surfaced in this rampage. His father was nuts; I believe he was too.
Dave Cullen
Hi Jeff. It's far too early to say, because while the cops have probably discovered a lot about him, and perhaps found some writing, only scraps have reached the public. Psychopathy is a definite possibility to keep an eye on, but not nearly enough info to make a call. (And just scanning down the checklist, most of the items, I respond with "Not nearly enough info to know.)
BTW, for what it's worth, psychopaths are not nuts, and very aware of what they're doing--though maybe you're using "nuts" a different way than crazy or insane.
I do think it's interesting that his father was diagnosed a psychopath by someone (not clear who--last I read), since it seems to be inborn. However, this was long before Dr. Hare created the Psychopathy Checklist, or anyone had come up with anything close to an agreed-upon criteria for what a psychopath was. (Hervey Cleckley's book was still the basis.) So any diagnosis at that time is a bit dubious. They may have applied the same word to a different understanding of what it meant. So I would not throw this info out by any means, but treat it with a grain of salt.
BTW, for what it's worth, psychopaths are not nuts, and very aware of what they're doing--though maybe you're using "nuts" a different way than crazy or insane.
I do think it's interesting that his father was diagnosed a psychopath by someone (not clear who--last I read), since it seems to be inborn. However, this was long before Dr. Hare created the Psychopathy Checklist, or anyone had come up with anything close to an agreed-upon criteria for what a psychopath was. (Hervey Cleckley's book was still the basis.) So any diagnosis at that time is a bit dubious. They may have applied the same word to a different understanding of what it meant. So I would not throw this info out by any means, but treat it with a grain of salt.
More Answered Questions
Ty Miller
asked
Dave Cullen:
Dave - as a huge fan of your writing, and as a writer myself, I have to ask: how do you maintain a tether to a project for such long periods of time without questioning (maybe you do lol) whether the work is headed in the right direction or not? Do you lose motivation or interest in the project and return? Or is it a steadfast operation of sorts?
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more



