138 books
—
10 voters
Cybernetics Books
Showing 1-50 of 999

by (shelved 54 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.99 — 750 ratings — published 1948

by (shelved 49 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.02 — 903 ratings — published 1949

by (shelved 30 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.14 — 132 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 26 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.07 — 895 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 25 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.08 — 127 ratings — published 1956

by (shelved 23 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.31 — 124 ratings — published 1972

by (shelved 22 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.21 — 177 ratings — published 1974

by (shelved 20 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.26 — 1,468 ratings — published 1972

by (shelved 17 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.27 — 804 ratings — published

by (shelved 16 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.25 — 48 ratings — published 1952

by (shelved 15 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.25 — 311 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 14 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.01 — 275 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 14 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.23 — 1,706 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 14 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.21 — 24 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 13 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.28 — 330 ratings — published 1973

by (shelved 11 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.38 — 681 ratings — published 1949

by (shelved 10 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.34 — 61 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 10 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.57 — 269 ratings — published 1964

by (shelved 10 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.90 — 818 ratings — published 1958

by (shelved 9 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.25 — 27,990 ratings — published 1960

by (shelved 9 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.15 — 1,868 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 9 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.29 — 24 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 9 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.16 — 51 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 9 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.07 — 114 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 9 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.27 — 145 ratings — published 1969

by (shelved 8 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.87 — 454 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 8 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.15 — 135 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 8 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.00 — 3 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 8 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.29 — 52,022 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 8 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.21 — 47 ratings — published 1975

by (shelved 7 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.97 — 668 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 7 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.88 — 3,210 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 7 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.14 — 1,265 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 6 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.13 — 46 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 6 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.78 — 9 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 6 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.19 — 21,405 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 6 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.90 — 798 ratings — published 1961

by (shelved 6 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.44 — 9 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 6 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 5.00 — 7 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 6 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.32 — 47 ratings — published 1966

by (shelved 6 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.20 — 1,311 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 5 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.89 — 358,576 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 5 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.25 — 12 ratings — published

by (shelved 5 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.04 — 16,966 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 5 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.94 — 172 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 5 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.92 — 60 ratings — published

by (shelved 5 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 3.73 — 33 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 5 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.12 — 300 ratings — published

by (shelved 5 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.15 — 239 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 5 times as cybernetics)
avg rating 4.21 — 33 ratings — published 2002

“Pick up a pinecone and count the spiral rows of scales. You may find eight spirals winding up to the left and 13 spirals winding up to the right, or 13 left and 21 right spirals, or other pairs of numbers. The striking fact is that these pairs of numbers are adjacent numbers in the famous Fibonacci series: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21... Here, each term is the sum of the previous two terms. The phenomenon is well known and called phyllotaxis. Many are the efforts of biologists to understand why pinecones, sunflowers, and many other plants exhibit this remarkable pattern. Organisms do the strangest things, but all these odd things need not reflect selection or historical accident. Some of the best efforts to understand phyllotaxis appeal to a form of self-organization. Paul Green, at Stanford, has argued persuasively that the Fibonacci series is just what one would expects as the simplest self-repeating pattern that can be generated by the particular growth processes in the growing tips of the tissues that form sunflowers, pinecones, and so forth. Like a snowflake and its sixfold symmetry, the pinecone and its phyllotaxis may be part of order for free”
― At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity
― At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity

“What I have said about the newspapers and the movies applies equally to the radio, to television, and even to bookselling. Thus we are in an age where the enormous per capita bulk of communication is met by an ever-thinning stream of total bulk of communication. More and more we must accept a standardized inoffensive and insignificant product which, like the white bread of the bakeries, is made rather for its keeping and selling properties than for its food value.
This is fundamentally an external handicap of modern communication, but it is paralleled by another which gnaws from within. This is the cancer of creative narrowness and feebleness.
In the old days, the young man who wished to enter the creative arts might either have plunged in directly or prepared himself by a general schooling, perhaps irrelevant to the specific tasks he finally undertook, but which was at least a searching discipline of his abilities and taste. Now the channels of apprenticeship are largely silted up. Our elementary and secondary schools are more interested in formal classroom discipline than in the intellectual discipline of learning something thoroughly, and a great deal of the serious preparation for a scientific or a literary course is relegated to some sort of graduate school or other.”
― The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society
This is fundamentally an external handicap of modern communication, but it is paralleled by another which gnaws from within. This is the cancer of creative narrowness and feebleness.
In the old days, the young man who wished to enter the creative arts might either have plunged in directly or prepared himself by a general schooling, perhaps irrelevant to the specific tasks he finally undertook, but which was at least a searching discipline of his abilities and taste. Now the channels of apprenticeship are largely silted up. Our elementary and secondary schools are more interested in formal classroom discipline than in the intellectual discipline of learning something thoroughly, and a great deal of the serious preparation for a scientific or a literary course is relegated to some sort of graduate school or other.”
― The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society