Ancient & Medieval Historical Fiction discussion

This topic is about
Dawn of Empire
Monthly Group Reads
>
JUNE 2015 (Group Read 1) Dawn of Empire by Sam Barone
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Darcy
(new)
May 21, 2015 04:13AM

reply
|
flag


Looking forward to contributing when the discussion gets going :)

I have just finished the Prologue and thus far I am enjoying it.


I'm not entirely sure that's an accident, Silver. The settled folk in this world aren't the idealistic, enlightened equality-minded people we find in other "farmer vs. horsemen" books by authors like Mary Mackey, Judith Tarr and Brenda Gates Smith.
Barone's take on village life was that it was great for those who held the power, and the means to keep it. For everyone else...not so great. The biggest difference between the government of Orak and 20th century NYC is that in New York, the ruling families had the law in their pocket. In Orak, the ruling families WERE the law.
Oligarchies were common in early civilization, and I can't think of a better reason for the ruling families to all a meeting than being faced with annihilation :)



I'm not entirel..."
That is interesting
(view spoiler)


Silver--I agree with most of what you said in your spoiler section. I'd like to address one aspect of what you said, since it doesn't give anything away, and is made clear in the first few chapters.
I can't understand anyone who sees the book as good guys = farmers, bad guys = horse tribes.
There were moments when I didn't like anyone in this book :) Other times, I thought the author might like the horse tribes better than the farmers, even though the farmers were the people I thought we were supposed to sympathize with.
Both cultures accepted slavery, something I can never accept among "good guys". As a historical note, in every culture in which slavery was practiced, there have been individuals who opposed it.
We see a little of this in Trella (my favorite character). She retains believable amounts of compassion and empathy, while at the same time focusing on what's best for her. She at least demonstrates it's possible to be both realistic and nice.

Silver--I agree with most of what you said in your spoiler section. I'd like to address one aspect of what you said, since it doesn't give anything away, and..."
I agree that Trella is a well balanced character. While it is true that in every culture and period of time there were people who were more progressive thinkers I feel that many HF writers try too hard to make their characters appeal to modern sensibilities.
But Trella's sympathies and her behavior and actions are believable and they are understandable considering her own experiences and background.

(view spoiler)

"
I know where you're coming from. I think Trella is a clever character, but almost too clever. She's quite young IIRC (19 or so?) and surely she would still be making a fair few mistakes and errors of judgement at that age (ha - as if we ever stop doing that!). Maybe it would have helped if she had a few more flaws to her makeup.
Still, I love the symbiotic nature of Trella and Eskarr's relationship. I guess the fact that they need each other shows that both are flawed/imperfect.

"
I know where you're coming from. I thin..."
Yeah that is the other thing that bothered me is her rather young age. Even if women were expected to marry young back then I cannot quite believe she really learned everything there was to know about running a noble household in so short a time.

Eskarr is more believable to me, simply because he is clearly flawed, and has to do a lot of growing and changing before he starts winning.

(view spoiler)

I'd like to comment on the ending, but I have to go find out how to hide a spoiler first!