The Book Vipers discussion

271 views
Off Topic > In The News

Comments Showing 1-50 of 309 (309 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7

message 1: by Chantal (last edited May 28, 2013 02:27AM) (new)

Chantal (chantal77) | 151 comments Mod
This is a thread for any general discussion of current events/news.

It's probably an idea to share opinions as respectfully as possible and not get too personal :)


message 2: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (merelyreading) My thoughts today are with Nelson Mandela, critically ill now.


message 3: by Chantal (new)

Chantal (chantal77) | 151 comments Mod
Any predictions for the sex of the new royal baby? I haven't a clue but secretly hope for a girl I think, mainly because that ancient law of male primogeniture has been scrapped, would be such a novelty to have a first-born girl next in line :)


message 4: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (merelyreading) Some of our best monarchs have been women, so hoping for a girl here too :)


message 5: by Chantal (new)

Chantal (chantal77) | 151 comments Mod
If it was I wonder if they'd call her Elizabeth or Victoria? :)


message 6: by Susan (new)

Susan (suze0501) | 190 comments Not much given to interest in the royals, but I do feel for her a bit. I mean who wants to have the fact that you're in labour broadcast across the world!


message 7: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (merelyreading) Chantal wrote: "If it was I wonder if they'd call her Elizabeth or Victoria? :)"

Well I know what I'd vote for!!


message 8: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (merelyreading) Lynne wrote: "The only news I want to hear is that it's getting cooler. I have a pile of ironing to do!"

Big storm coming, so I've heard. Don't get caught ironing then, otherwise we might have one less person to talk to about books :D


message 9: by Chantal (new)

Chantal (chantal77) | 151 comments Mod
:D


message 10: by Chantal (new)

Chantal (chantal77) | 151 comments Mod
Ironing...whats that?


message 11: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (merelyreading) Susan wrote: "Not much given to interest in the royals, but I do feel for her a bit. I mean who wants to have the fact that you're in labour broadcast across the world!"

No, quite! It was bad enough that the family knew.


message 12: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (merelyreading) Chantal wrote: "Ironing...whats that?"

That's my reaction too! My MIL commented last week that, with the washing drying so quickly in this heat, I would be able to get the ironing done the same day! What ironing would that be then?!!! My iron rarely gets used these days!


message 13: by Chantal (new)

Chantal (chantal77) | 151 comments Mod
I'm pretty sure my MIL gave up on me years ago ;)


message 14: by Chantal (new)

Chantal (chantal77) | 151 comments Mod
And after all that speculation, a boy :)


message 15: by Susan (new)

Susan (suze0501) | 190 comments My money's on George ... ?


message 16: by Jo (new)

Jo Weston (joster) | 1697 comments Mod
My son, George, joked this morning that maybe the prince would be named after him. We then read that it is the bookies favourite! We will see....


message 17: by Jen (new)

Jen (jefnerf) | 369 comments Mod
I think we should aim for king henry 9th hehe


message 18: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (merelyreading) My husband thought it might be James.

I like Henry, it being my son's name!


message 19: by Lisa (new)

Lisa (mrswhams) | 730 comments Mod
It would be nice to have something less traditional. I always though Beatrice and Eugenie were quite unusual choices.

I agree George or James seems likely.


message 20: by Lisa (new)

Lisa (mrswhams) | 730 comments Mod
Just seen it's been announced as George as I was typing!


message 21: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (merelyreading) I like the name choice!


message 22: by Bionic Jean (new)

Bionic Jean (bionicjean) I wish I'd bet on it now:(


message 23: by Paul (new)

Paul (halfmanhalfbook) | 5463 comments Mod
Elizabeth wrote: "My thoughts today are with Nelson Mandela, critically ill now."


RIP Nelson Mandela. A true inspiration for humanity


message 24: by Cheryl (new)

Cheryl Hall | 22 comments RIP Nelson Mandela.


message 25: by Jo (new)

Jo Weston (joster) | 1697 comments Mod
I am thinking of the people on the Norfolk/Suffolk/Essex coasts tonight.

Sad to hear about Mandela.


message 26: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth (merelyreading) RIP Nelson Mandela. A truly great man.

These coastal surges are very worrying. The worst for 60 years so I've heard. Hope everyone stays safe.


message 27: by Gail (new)

Gail | 127 comments Thoughts today with those in the flood areas whether already affected or waiting for high tides.

RIP Nelson Mandela. The world is a poorer place today.


message 28: by Paul (new)

Paul (halfmanhalfbook) | 5463 comments Mod
RIP Gabriel García Márquez


message 29: by Debbie (new)

Debbie (debbiegregory) | 585 comments I just read that news. Very sad. RIP Gabriel and thank you for such wonderful stories. x


message 30: by Jo (new)

Jo Weston (joster) | 1697 comments Mod
RIP indeed, he wrote some incredible literature. After travelling to South America over twenty years ago, I so enjoyed reading some of his work and I am long overdue reading another.


message 31: by Jason (new)

Jason (jasondenness) | 1877 comments Just on the news here in the UK, to kill a mockingbird and of mice and men are both banned from be taught to kids in schools, The kids need to be taught about British authors....J K Rowling?

Its a crazy world.


message 32: by Sandy (new)

Sandy | 458 comments UK has so many excellent authors but so does the US. That is really sad. I hate it when books are banned for whatever reason. :(


message 33: by Pat (new)

Pat Morris-jones | 1373 comments Why Jason?


message 34: by Jason (new)

Jason (jasondenness) | 1877 comments Pat wrote: "Why Jason?"

They say kids need to read British books.


message 35: by Susan (new)

Susan (suze0501) | 190 comments I'm not sure the reason's important. These are not only classic pieces of literature, they teach us about fundamental human rights; about humanity; dignity - however this decision was made it is, quite simply, wrong.


message 36: by Pat (new)

Pat Morris-jones | 1373 comments Children need to read books. End of.


message 37: by Shirley (new)

Shirley | 82 comments It's actually worse than that. It's English books only.


message 38: by Pat (new)

Pat Morris-jones | 1373 comments No Greek or Latin for the kids then? Does that apply to the public schools? Or just state schools?


message 39: by Jason (new)

Jason (jasondenness) | 1877 comments Pat wrote: "No Greek or Latin for the kids then? Does that apply to the public schools? Or just state schools?"

I think it must be all as it is for the GCSE exams.


message 40: by Sam (new)

Sam Arnold (samharnold) I have just heard that in his continual assault of the British education system Michael Gove is calling for some of the classics such as To Kill a Mockingbird and Mice of Men to be taken of the GCSE reading curriculum. In my opinion a step too far.


message 41: by Paul (new)

Paul (halfmanhalfbook) | 5463 comments Mod
Gove will go down as one of the worst education secretaries ever.

Here is the link on the BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-2...


message 42: by Shirley (new)

Shirley | 82 comments Sam wrote: "I have just heard that in his continual assault of the British education system Michael Gove is calling for some of the classics such as To Kill a Mockingbird and Mice of Men to be taken of the GCS..."

Yes, from now on kids will only get to study English texts for GCSE English, due to Michael Gove's interference.


message 43: by Jason (new)

Jason (jasondenness) | 1877 comments Hopefully he will also take out all those big words from the dictionary he doesn't like.


message 44: by Sam (new)

Sam Arnold (samharnold) I just hope whoever takes over from him has something worth repairing.


message 45: by Liz (new)

Liz (lizzique) This all seems a bit ott to me to be honest. They're changing the syllabus, not banning books. So long as the kids are reading good quality literature (we hope), what does it matter whether that syllabus includes particular classics or not? The argument of what should and should not be included is neverending and no doubt would change from generation to generation.

Books/works of literature can be dragged down and become "love to hate" by generations of those forced to read them. Far better to keep it fresh. Better for the teachers too.

Is the new syllabus out yet? V interesting that the GCSE syllabus is such a focus of interest! I don't think it would receive the same coverage here (Ireland).


message 46: by Shirley (new)

Shirley | 82 comments I would have to disagree with you there. It's a far bigger issue than banning those two books, and it is a disgrace that he should have that kind of power.


message 47: by Jason (new)

Jason (jasondenness) | 1877 comments I haven't read anywhere the logic behind the decision, just seems to be English books only.


message 48: by Shirley (new)

Shirley | 82 comments Jason wrote: "I haven't read anywhere the logic behind the decision, just seems to be English books only."

I think it's just Gove's personal taste. He seems to be against anything other than English Literature, and thinks our literature is far superior than that of other countries and cultures. I don't have a problem with changing books on the curriculum, what I don't like is the way the teaching of English is being restricted on this way.


message 49: by Sam (new)

Sam Arnold (samharnold) I have to agree with Shirley the issue is so much bigger than what books are on the curriculum or not. I understand books can change. The issue for me is the restriction on teachers over the teaching methods. This is just another example of Michael Gove making instant decisions without taking the time to look at the wider picture. It is no surprise that our education is so far behind other countries with this idiot making the decisions.


message 50: by Liz (new)

Liz (lizzique) So what is the issue if it is not about what books are on the syllabus?

Teaching at second level is surely always restricted. That is the nature of having a syllabus. Not to mention preparing children for set exams?


« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7
back to top