Children's Books discussion
Themes, Topics & Categories
>
Low Fantasy Books - What Are Your Favorites?
date
newest »
newest »
"Low fantasy" is a new term for me. I wonder if Across the Great Barrier would qualify? For some reason, this story really appealed to me.
Never heard of 'low fantasy' either. Low or high, it's just fantasy to me!!! And I'll read either one.
Tricia wrote: "Never heard of 'low fantasy' either. Low or high, it's just fantasy to me!!! And I'll read either one."I thought I thought the same as you, but when I started looking at the book titles I realized that most of what I like falls into the "low fantasy" sub-genre. Who knew?
I wonder if the same rules apply to science fiction? Is Slaughterhouse-Five low sci-fi?
I have heard of that distinction, but I don't really like the term "low" fantasy because there is such an automatic negative connotation attached to it (or at least there can be).
I was taught the distinction in children's lit classes in college. I am not sure how important the distinction feels to me...fantasy isn't my go to genre, but there are certainly many fantasy books that I love...both high fantasy and low fantasy. I hadn't really thought of the negative connotation, Gundula, but I can certainly see that now that I think about it.As for titles, I'll have to think for a bit and reply later.
I'm the author of A Guide to Fantasy Literature (see http://www.fantasylit.com/ for more) and am reasonably well-read on fantasy literature . . . and I've never run into the term (although "high" fantasy is used for a certain classic type). I agree with the comment above that "low" unfortunately has a negative connotation and doesn't fit in any real sense except as something different from "high" fantasy. I do warm in my book to beware labels (quoting an admonition from Tolkien) . . . but then I go on to identify some main categories of fantasy (which aren't fully exclusive, though). I use the terms high fantasy, adventure fantasy, fairy-tale fantasy, magical realism, and dark fantasy. To me, the key aspect isn't where they happen but more significant fictional techniques, literary influences, and especially what they are trying to say about the large issues of good and evil, right and wrong, etc. -- the thing that fantasy is mostly about.
Gundula wrote: "I have heard of that distinction, but I don't really like the term "low" fantasy because there is such an automatic negative connotation attached to it (or at least there can be)."Oh, it doesn't bother me. People who are truly interested will use the word in proper context, and those who don't - well, there's not much I can do for them.
I don't know that I'd ever heard the term "low" fantasy, though it does rather make sense. I've lately heard the term "gateway fantasy," which fits with ALICE'S ADVENTURES IN WONDERLAND, OZ, and Narnia. I love those, and other "low" fantasy books. One of my favorites that I rarely hear mentioned is Betty Brock's No Flying in the House. The Narnia Chronicles are my favorite, though.
Chandra wrote: "I also definitely love it when high and low are mixed - another recent favorite of that genre is Gregor the Overlander. So great!"I have GREGOR on my TBR list, which just keeps getting longer and longer ...
Just finished reading Bedknob And Broomstick by Mary Norton - thoroughly enjoyed them - they're perfect examples of low fantasy.
Yes. Two short books actually, written several years apart and then offered as one volume. Both published prior to The Borrowers.
I'm thinking the terms "high" and "low" are a bit too vague or too variable from person to person to be really useful, in addition to the fact that so many speculative fiction books are hard to categorize anyway...But I'll go with the flow and add Dial-a-Ghost to the list. Eva Ibbotson has a number of books in this category, but we liked DIal-a-Ghost best.
Books mentioned in this topic
Dial-a-Ghost (other topics)The Borrowers (other topics)
Bedknob and Broomstick (other topics)
No Flying in the House (other topics)
Slaughterhouse-Five (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Mary Norton (other topics)Pauline Clarke (other topics)
Penelope Farmer (other topics)



Perhaps the most famous low fantasy novels are:
“The Barrowers” by Mary Norton, “The Dark is Rising” by Susan Cooper, “Five Children and It” by E. Nesbit, “Mary Poppins” by P. L. Travers, “The Indian in the Cupboard” by Lynne Reid Banks, “The Children of Green Knowe” by L. M. Boston and “Tuck Everlasting” by Natalie Babbit and many by Roald Dahl.
Two of my favorites are:
The twelve and the Genii by Pauline Clarke - Beautifully conceived and written, and the author has done a splendid job of bringing the twelve wooden soldiers to life in a way that never once panders or condescends to its targeted child audience. The English countryside - a small village - toy that come to life - the Bronte's - there is something for everyone. This story is endearing, suspenseful and humorous. I didn't want it to end. I thought the young protagonist "Max" was a perfectly realized boy. The relationships with his family were spot on. This is a fantasy and an adventure and simply can't believe that it isn't held up and universally celebrated as a classic.
and
Charlotte Sometimes by Penelope Farmer - The story is simply told in a clear prose style. It is about a girl in a boarding school in the late 1950s who goes to sleep only to wake up as someone else in 1918 - the girls change places from day to day until the girl from the 50s gets stuck in 1918 when the other girl is removed from the school. The rest of the narrative deals with her adjustment to living in 1918 and her attempts to get back. It's really a lovely tale, well told. I was immediately taken with Charlotte and the other characters. I believed them as characters and felt that the dynamics of their relationships rang true. There is a séance and the armistice and suspense and fantasy.
What are some of your favorites?