Play Book Tag discussion
June, 2016: Fantasy
>
The Golem and the Jinni/Wecker - 3 stars
date
newest »
newest »
I'm still plodding along with this one. I started it on June 23 and 11 days later I'm still reading. I've got about 150 pages to go still, and I feel like I'll be reading forever. Parts of it really draw me in and then ... I'm yanked out of that story to a different thread and lose interest. S I G H
Wish my library had this in audio ... I think I'd be done by now.
Maybe one of us should have read this first and informed the other! Or I should have just listened to Linda who warned me.
Anita wrote: "No you didn't Susie! There was probably a gut feeling I had about it that kept me from reading it for a really long time, even though I purchased it ages ago. We will blame the fantasy tag!"I did warn you when I read it, I knew in my gut you would not like it. Knowing you for going on 9 years does that.
Ha ha, way back when??? That's probably why I never read it . . .I need to write these warnings down for goodness sake.



On the good side, the book builds steadily, and I found the final fifth pretty gripping and the struggles of the Golem and the Jinni (especially the Jinni) escalate to the point where the reader is most certainly cheering them on and hoping for a good outcome for both. So the author is successful in humanizing both.
On the negative side, the book seemed to really drag on and on in the middle section. There's a lot of walking around New York and while the setting is described well and creates a great atmosphere . . .it's just too much and slowed the book down for me. In addition, there's an antagonist and while the Golem and the Jinni became believable to me, despite their fantastical origins, the antagonist remained a caricature, his motivations driven by an imaginative backstory that the reader must be able to suspend disbelief to truly enjoy. That's why I just don't read fantasy much, because I'm pretty cynical and find it hard not to look at these kind of plot constructs through a very critical lens.
All in all, I think this book is one that I came out feeling neutral about . . .didn't dislike it, didn't love it, and if I had it to do over again, I probably wouldn't read it, but on the flip side, it is technically well done, and I can see why some readers loved it so much.